Literature DB >> 25130272

Cochlear implantation in children with bacterial meningitic deafness: The influence of the degree of ossification and obliteration on impedance and charge of the implant.

Martin Durisin, Andreas Büchner, Anke Lesinski-Schiedat, Sönke Bartling, Athanasia Warnecke, Thomas Lenarz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine impedance values and charge consumption following cochlear implantation post-meningitic deaf children depending on the grade of cochlear ossification and obliteration.
METHODS: Post-meningitic deaf (n=49) and control (n=43) children treated with cochlear implants were included in the study. Impedance and charge values were calculated for each group. The degree of ossification of the cochlea was evaluated from a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan whereas the degree of obliteration was determined intraoperatively by the surgeon.
RESULTS: Pneumococci were the principal pathogen responsible for bacterial meningitis, followed by meningococci. In HRCT scans, the degree of ossification was 1 and 2 in 29% of patients. The results of the intraoperative assessment of the cochlea showed obliteration grade 1 in 38% and grade 2 in 23% of cases. Children in the meningitis group showed significant higher impedances comparing to the control group. A significantly increased charge consumption was observed in patients with a grade 2 ossification when compared to those without ossification (P=0.02). Discussion Cochlea implanted children with meningitis-related deafness exhibit higher impedances, especially in the region of the basal and middle turn, however, not depending on the degree of cochlear ossification. High impedances and charge in the meningitis group may be explained by alterations in the central auditory pathway or on the electrode surface.
CONCLUSION: To optimize the outcome in post-meningitic deaf children, surgery is advisable at an early stage prior to the onset of cochlear ossification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial meningitis; Charge; Cochlea implantation; Cochlear obliteration; Cochlear ossification; Impedances

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130272     DOI: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  6 in total

1.  Auditory Detection Thresholds and Cochlear Resistivity Differ Between Pediatric Cochlear Implant Listeners With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct and Those With Connexin-26 Mutations.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Molly D Bergan; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Incomplete and false tract insertions in cochlear implantation: retrospective review of surgical and auditory outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish Vashishth; Andrea Fulcheri; Maurizio Guida; Antonio Caruso; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Programming characteristics of cochlear implants in children: effects of aetiology and age at implantation.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Sanna Hou; Patricia Van Buynder; Christopher Flynn; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Surgical Methods and Auditory Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Cochlear Ossification.

Authors:  Taskin Tokat; Tolgahan Catli; Ergul Basaran Bozkurt; Levent Olgun
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Histopathological changes to the peripheral vestibular system following meningitic labyrinthitis.

Authors:  Henrique F Pauna; Renata M Knoll; Rory J Lubner; Jacob R Brodsky; Sharon L Cushing; Miguel A Hyppolito; Joseph B Nadol; Aaron K Remenschneider; Elliott D Kozin
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.