Literature DB >> 25129406

A Trimodality Comparison of Volumetric Bone Imaging Technologies. Part II: 1-Yr Change, Long-Term Precision, and Least Significant Change.

Andy K O Wong1, Karen A Beattie2, Kevin K H Min3, Zamir Merali4, Colin E Webber5, Christopher L Gordon6, Alexandra Papaioannou7, Angela M W Cheung8, Jonathan D Adachi2.   

Abstract

The previous article in this 3-part series demonstrated short-term precision and validity for volumetric bone outcome quantification using in vivo peripheral (p) quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities at resolutions 200 μm or higher. However, 1-yr precision error and clinically significant references are yet to be reported for these modalities. This study examined 59 women with mean age of 75 ± 9 yr and body mass index of 26.84 ± 4.77 kg/m², demonstrating the lowest 1-yr precision error, standard errors of the estimate, and least significant change values for high-resolution (hr) pQCT followed by pQCT, and 1.0-T pMRI for all volumetric bone outcomes except trabecular number. Like short-term precision, 1-yr statistics for trabecular separation were similar across modalities. Excluding individuals with a previous history of fragility fractures, or who were current users of antiresorptives reduced 1-yr change for bone outcomes derived from pQCT and pMR images, but not hr-pQCT images. In Part II of this 3-part series focused on trimodality comparisons of 1-yr changes, hr-pQCT was recommended to be the prime candidate for quantifying change where smaller effect sizes are expected, but pQCT was identified as a feasible alternative for studies expecting larger changes.
Copyright © 2015 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; least significant change; long-term precision; pQCT; segmentation; standard error of the estimate

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25129406      PMCID: PMC5092156          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  33 in total

Review 1.  A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians.

Authors:  Harold M Frost
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Optimization of follow-up measurements of bone mass.

Authors:  L F Verheij; J A Blokland; S E Papapoulos; A H Zwinderman; E K Pauwels
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius from high-resolution computed tomography images.

Authors:  C L Gordon; C E Webber; J D Adachi; N Christoforou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the calcaneus: age-related changes in trabecular structure and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  X Ouyang; K Selby; P Lang; K Engelke; C Klifa; B Fan; F Zucconi; G Hottya; M Chen; S Majumdar; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Longitudinal evaluation of the effects of alendronate on MRI bone microarchitecture in postmenopausal osteopenic women.

Authors:  Jenny Folkesson; Janet Goldenstein; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Galateia Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Ana Rodriguez; Roland Krug; Anne E de Papp; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Maturity- and sex-related changes in tibial bone geometry, strength and bone-muscle strength indices during growth: a 20-month pQCT study.

Authors:  Heather M Macdonald; Saija A Kontulainen; Kerry J Mackelvie-O'Brien; Moira A Petit; Patricia Janssen; Karim M Khan; Heather A McKay
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone mass and density response to a 12-month trial of calcium and vitamin D supplement in preadolescent girls.

Authors:  L J Moyer-Mileur; B Xie; S D Ball; T Pratt
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.041

8.  Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; K Brown; C Cann; K Zhu; S Henzell; V Low; S Gustafsson; R I Price; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; David A Hanley; K Shawn Davison; Robert Josse; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Bisphosphonate mechanism of action.

Authors:  Alfred A Reszka; Gideon A Rodan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.686

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of a 20-week high-intensity strength and sprint training program on tibial bone structure and strength in middle-aged and older male sprint athletes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T H Suominen; M T Korhonen; M Alén; A Heinonen; A Mero; T Törmäkangas; H Suominen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  A Comparison of Peripheral Imaging Technologies for Bone and Muscle Quantification: a Mixed Methods Clinical Review.

Authors:  Andy Kin On Wong
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Least significant changes and monitoring time intervals for high-resolution pQCT-derived bone outcomes in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  C E Kawalilak; J D Johnston; W P Olszynski; S A Kontulainen
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.041

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.