Literature DB >> 25128908

MRI criteria for the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma: a validation study.

Soroush Zaghi1, Leenoy Hendizadeh2, Tony Hung2, Salar Farahvar2, Elliot Abemayor2, Ali R Sepahdari3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate an MRI algorithm characteristic of pleomorphic adenoma (PA). STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis.
SETTING: Academic tertiary-care medical center.
METHODS: A radiologic algorithm for the MRI diagnosis of PA was developed on the basis of five "high probability" criteria that all must be fulfilled for the MRI to qualify as a positive test result: bright T2-signal, sharp margins, heterogeneous nodular enhancement, lobulated contours, T2-dark rim. We then identified MRI images from our institutional database to test the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed algorithm.
RESULTS: A total of 103 parotidectomy cases with adequate MRI studies were identified (pleomorphic adenoma n=41, mucoepidermoid carcinoma n=11, Warthin's tumor n=8, adenoid cystic carcinoma n=6, oncocytoma n=6, acinic cell carcinoma n=5, salivary duct carcinoma n=5, and other n=21). Eighteen of 21 cases that met all five "high probability" MRI criteria were consistent with PA on final histopathology; 3 were consistent with carcinoma. MRI had a specificity of 95.1% [95% confidence interval: 85.6-98.7%] and sensitivity of 43.9% [95% C.I.: 28.8-60.1%] for PA. The positive predictive value was 85.7% [95% C.I.: 70.4-100%] and the negative predictive value was 71.9% [95% C. I.: 62.0-81.9%]. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 74.8% [95% C.I.: 66.2-83.3%].
CONCLUSION: A "high probability" MRI is about 95% specific for pleomorphic adenoma. A subset of patients with MRI imaging that is highly suggestive of PA may reliably avoid further workup. The value of MRI in this setting is especially useful if preoperative fine needle aspiration is not readily available. A significant proportion of PAs, however, have indeterminate imaging features that overlap considerably with other benign and malignant lesions. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128908     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  5 in total

1.  Correlation between preoperative predictions and surgical findings in the parotid surgery for tumors.

Authors:  Michael Vaiman; Judith Luckman; Tal Sigal; Inessa Bekerman
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 2.  Review of the Major and Minor Salivary Glands, Part 2: Neoplasms and Tumor-like Lesions.

Authors:  Alexander T Kessler; Alok A Bhatt
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2018-11-15

3.  Surgical Treatment of a Giant Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Submandibular Gland: A Case Report.

Authors:  Zehui Wu; Defeng Liu; Shihao Peng; Yuejun Wang; Xiaolin Zhan; Laibin Li; Hong Wan; Yangyang Li; Tao Guo; Aman Xu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 4.  Advanced magnetic resonance imaging findings in salivary gland tumors.

Authors:  Erkan Gökçe; Murat Beyhan
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2022-08-28

5.  Preoperative Diagnostic Strategy for Parotid Gland Tumors Using Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Technetium-99m Pertechnetate Scintigraphy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Masahiro Kikuchi; Sho Koyasu; Shogo Shinohara; Yukihiro Imai; Megumu Hino; Yasushi Naito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.