Literature DB >> 25128755

A framework for monitoring social process and outcomes in environmental programs.

Sarah Chapman1.   

Abstract

When environmental programs frame their activities as being in the service of human wellbeing, social variables need to be integrated into monitoring and evaluation (M&E) frameworks. This article draws upon ecosystem services theory to develop a framework to guide the M&E of collaborative environmental programs with anticipated social benefits. The framework has six components: program need, program activities, pathway process variables, moderating process variables, outcomes, and program value. Needs are defined in terms of ecosystem services, as well as other human needs that must be addressed to achieve outcomes. The pathway variable relates to the development of natural resource governance capacity in the target community. Moderating processes can be externalities such as the inherent capacity of the natural system to service ecosystem needs, local demand for natural resources, policy or socio-economic drivers. Internal program-specific processes relate to program service delivery, targeting and participant responsiveness. Ecological outcomes are expressed in terms of changes in landscape structure and function, which in turn influence ecosystem service provision. Social benefits derived from the program are expressed in terms of the value of the eco-social service to user-specified goals. The article provides suggestions from the literature for identifying indicators and measures for components and component variables, and concludes with an example of how the framework was used to inform the M&E of an adaptive co-management program in western Kenya.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive co-management; Collaborative adaptive management; Community based natural resource management; Conceptual framework; Conservation; Ecosystems services theory; Environmental programs; Indicators; Monitoring and evaluation; Theory-based evaluation approaches

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128755     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  1 in total

1.  Assessment of urban sustainability efficiency based on general data envelopment analysis: a case study of two cities in western and eastern China.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Peng Shan; Chenxing Wang; Yuan Quan; Di Wu; Chunli Zhao; Gang Wu; Hongbing Deng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.