R Carroll1, C Metcalfe2, D Gunnell2. 1. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK. Electronic address: Robert.Carroll@Bristol.ac.uk. 2. School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-harm is a common reason for hospital presentation; however, evidence to guide clinical management of these patients to reduce their risk of repeat self-harm and suicide is lacking. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review to investigate whether between study differences in reported clinical management of self-harm patients were associated with the risk of repeat self-harm and suicide. RESULTS: Altogether 64 prospective studies were identified that described the clinical care of self-harm patients and the incidence of repeat self-harm and suicide. The proportion of a cohort psychosocially assessed was not associated with the recorded incidence of repeat self-harm or suicide; the incidence of repeat self-harm was 16.7% (95% CI 13.8-20.1) in studies in the lowest tertile of assessment levels and 19.0% (95% CI 15.7-23.0) in the highest tertile. There was no association of repeat self-harm with differing levels of hospital admission (n=47 studies) or receiving specialist follow-up (n=12 studies). In studies reporting on levels of hospital admission and suicide (n=5), cohorts where a higher proportion of patients were admitted to a hospital bed reported a lower incidence of subsequent suicide (0.6%, 95% CI 0.5-0.8) compared to cohorts with lower levels of admission (1.9%, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). LIMITATIONS: In some analyses power was limited due to the small number of studies reporting the exposures of interest. Case mix and aspects of care are likely to vary between studies. DISCUSSION: There is little clear evidence to suggest routine aspects of self-harm patient care, including psychosocial assessment, reduce the risk of subsequent suicide and repeat self-harm.
BACKGROUND: Self-harm is a common reason for hospital presentation; however, evidence to guide clinical management of these patients to reduce their risk of repeat self-harm and suicide is lacking. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review to investigate whether between study differences in reported clinical management of self-harm patients were associated with the risk of repeat self-harm and suicide. RESULTS: Altogether 64 prospective studies were identified that described the clinical care of self-harm patients and the incidence of repeat self-harm and suicide. The proportion of a cohort psychosocially assessed was not associated with the recorded incidence of repeat self-harm or suicide; the incidence of repeat self-harm was 16.7% (95% CI 13.8-20.1) in studies in the lowest tertile of assessment levels and 19.0% (95% CI 15.7-23.0) in the highest tertile. There was no association of repeat self-harm with differing levels of hospital admission (n=47 studies) or receiving specialist follow-up (n=12 studies). In studies reporting on levels of hospital admission and suicide (n=5), cohorts where a higher proportion of patients were admitted to a hospital bed reported a lower incidence of subsequent suicide (0.6%, 95% CI 0.5-0.8) compared to cohorts with lower levels of admission (1.9%, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). LIMITATIONS: In some analyses power was limited due to the small number of studies reporting the exposures of interest. Case mix and aspects of care are likely to vary between studies. DISCUSSION: There is little clear evidence to suggest routine aspects of self-harm patient care, including psychosocial assessment, reduce the risk of subsequent suicide and repeat self-harm.
Authors: Mark Olfson; Carlos Blanco; Melanie Wall; Shang-Min Liu; Tulshi D Saha; Roger P Pickering; Bridget F Grant Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Ella Arensman; Eve Griffin; Caroline Daly; Paul Corcoran; Eugene Cassidy; Ivan J Perry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Caroline Clements; Pauline Turnbull; Keith Hawton; Galit Geulayov; Keith Waters; Jennifer Ness; Ellen Townsend; Kazem Khundakar; Nav Kapur Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah Steeg; Leah Quinlivan; Rebecca Nowland; Robert Carroll; Deborah Casey; Caroline Clements; Jayne Cooper; Linda Davies; Duleeka Knipe; Jennifer Ness; Rory C O'Connor; Keith Hawton; David Gunnell; Nav Kapur Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Joni Jackson; Manjula D Nugawela; Frank De Vocht; Paul Moran; William Hollingworth; Duleeka Knipe; Nik Munien; David Gunnell; Maria Theresa Redaniel Journal: BJPsych Open Date: 2020-04-02