Iris M Markusse1, Linda Dirven2, Marianne van den Broek2, Casper Bijkerk2, K Huub Han2, H Karel Ronday2, Rebecca Bolce2, Eric H Sasso2, Pit J S M Kerstens2, Willem F Lems2, Tom W J Huizinga2, Cornelia F Allaart2. 1. From the Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam; Haga Hospital, the Hague; Reade organization; VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Crescendo Bioscience, South San Francisco, California, USA.I.M. Markusse, MD; L. Dirven, PhD; M. van den Broek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; C. Bijkerk, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital; K.H. Han, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital; H.K. Ronday, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Haga Hospital; R. Bolce, MSN; E.H. Sasso, MD, Crescendo Bioscience; P.J.S.M. Kerstens, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Reade; W.F. Lems, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Reade, and VU Medical Center; T.W.J. Huizinga, MD, PhD; C.F. Allaart, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center. i.m.markusse@lumc.nl. 2. From the Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft; Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam; Haga Hospital, the Hague; Reade organization; VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Crescendo Bioscience, South San Francisco, California, USA.I.M. Markusse, MD; L. Dirven, PhD; M. van den Broek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; C. Bijkerk, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital; K.H. Han, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital; H.K. Ronday, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Haga Hospital; R. Bolce, MSN; E.H. Sasso, MD, Crescendo Bioscience; P.J.S.M. Kerstens, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Reade; W.F. Lems, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Reade, and VU Medical Center; T.W.J. Huizinga, MD, PhD; C.F. Allaart, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score predicts radiographic damage progression in the subsequent year in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: There were 180 serum samples available in the BeSt study (trial numbers NTR262, NTR 265): 91 at baseline (84 with radiographs available) and 89 at 1-year followup (81 with radiographs available). Radiographs were assessed using the Sharp/van der Heijde Score (SvdH). Twelve serum biomarkers were measured to determine MBDA scores using a validated algorithm. Receiver-operating curves and Poisson regression analyses were performed, with Disease Activity Score (DAS) and MBDA score as independent variables, and radiographic progression as dependent variable. RESULTS: At baseline, MBDA scores discriminated more between patients who developed radiographic progression (increase in SvdH≥5 points) and patients who did not [area under the curve (AUC) 0.767, 95% CI 0.639-0.896] than did DAS (AUC 0.521, 95% CI 0.358-0.684). At 1 year, MBDA score had an AUC of 0.691 (95% CI 0.453-0.929) and DAS had an AUC of 0.649 (95% CI 0.417-0.880). Adjusted for anticitrullinated protein antibody status and DAS, higher MBDA scores were associated with an increased risk for SvdH progression [relative risk (RR) 1.039, 95% CI 1.018-1.059 for baseline MBDA score; 1.037, 95% CI 1.009-1.065 for Year 1 MBDA score]. Categorized high MBDA scores were also correlated with SvdH progression (RR for high MBDA score at baseline 3.7; low or moderate MBDA score as reference). At 1 year, high MBDA score gave a RR of 4.6 compared to low MBDA score. CONCLUSION:MBDA scores predict radiographic damage progression at baseline and during disease course.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score predicts radiographic damage progression in the subsequent year in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: There were 180 serum samples available in the BeSt study (trial numbers NTR262, NTR 265): 91 at baseline (84 with radiographs available) and 89 at 1-year followup (81 with radiographs available). Radiographs were assessed using the Sharp/van der Heijde Score (SvdH). Twelve serum biomarkers were measured to determine MBDA scores using a validated algorithm. Receiver-operating curves and Poisson regression analyses were performed, with Disease Activity Score (DAS) and MBDA score as independent variables, and radiographic progression as dependent variable. RESULTS: At baseline, MBDA scores discriminated more between patients who developed radiographic progression (increase in SvdH≥5 points) and patients who did not [area under the curve (AUC) 0.767, 95% CI 0.639-0.896] than did DAS (AUC 0.521, 95% CI 0.358-0.684). At 1 year, MBDA score had an AUC of 0.691 (95% CI 0.453-0.929) and DAS had an AUC of 0.649 (95% CI 0.417-0.880). Adjusted for anticitrullinated protein antibody status and DAS, higher MBDA scores were associated with an increased risk for SvdH progression [relative risk (RR) 1.039, 95% CI 1.018-1.059 for baseline MBDA score; 1.037, 95% CI 1.009-1.065 for Year 1 MBDA score]. Categorized high MBDA scores were also correlated with SvdH progression (RR for high MBDA score at baseline 3.7; low or moderate MBDA score as reference). At 1 year, high MBDA score gave a RR of 4.6 compared to low MBDA score. CONCLUSION: MBDA scores predict radiographic damage progression at baseline and during disease course.
Entities:
Keywords:
BIOMARKERS; MULTIBIOMARKER DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC JOINT DAMAGE PROGRESSION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
Authors: Tate M Johnson; Kyle A Register; Cynthia M Schmidt; James R O'Dell; Ted R Mikuls; Kaleb Michaud; Bryant R England Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Leslie B Gordon; Susan E Campbell; Joseph M Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino; Monica E Kleinman; Mark W Kieran; Marsha A Moses Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Debbie M Boeters; Leonie E Burgers; Eric H Sasso; Tom W J Huizinga; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Christopher J Edwards; Patrick Kiely; Subhashini Arthanari; Sandeep Kiri; Julie Mount; Jane Barry; Catherine R Mitchell; Polly Field; Philip G Conaghan Journal: Rheumatol Adv Pract Date: 2019-02-15
Authors: Wanying Li; Eric H Sasso; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil; Tom W J Huizinga Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Yvonne C Lee; James Hackett; Michelle Frits; Christine K Iannaccone; Nancy A Shadick; Michael E Weinblatt; Oscar G Segurado; Eric H Sasso Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Nadia M T Roodenrijs; Maria J H de Hair; Gill Wheater; Mohsen Elshahaly; Janneke Tekstra; Y K Onno Teng; Floris P J G Lafeber; Ching Chang Hwang; Xinyu Liu; Eric H Sasso; Jacob M van Laar Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 5.156