OBJECTIVE: The recently validated Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) is a new rapid bedside nursing screen for delirium in hospitalized children of all ages. The present manuscript provides a "developmental anchor points" reference chart, which helps ground clinicians' assessment of CAPD symptom domains in a developmental understanding of the presentation of delirium. METHOD: During the development of this CAPD screening tool, it became clear that clinicians need specific guidance and training to help them draw on their expertise in child development and pediatrics to improve the interpretative reliability of the tool and its accuracy in diagnosing delirium. The developmental anchor points chart was formulated and reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts to evaluate content validity and include consideration of sick behaviors within a hospital setting. RESULTS: The CAPD developmental anchor points for the key ages of newborn, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years served as the basis for training bedside nurses in scoring the CAPD for the validation trial and as a multifaceted bedside reference chart to be implemented within a clinical setting. In the current paper, we discuss the lessons learned during implementation, with particular emphasis on the importance of collaboration with the bedside nurse, the challenges of establishing a developmental baseline, and further questions about delirium diagnosis in children. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The CAPD with developmental anchor points provides a validated, structured, and developmentally informed approach to screening and assessment of delirium in children. With minimal training on the use of the tool, bedside nurses and other pediatric practitioners can reliably identify children at risk for delirium.
OBJECTIVE: The recently validated Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) is a new rapid bedside nursing screen for delirium in hospitalized children of all ages. The present manuscript provides a "developmental anchor points" reference chart, which helps ground clinicians' assessment of CAPD symptom domains in a developmental understanding of the presentation of delirium. METHOD: During the development of this CAPD screening tool, it became clear that clinicians need specific guidance and training to help them draw on their expertise in child development and pediatrics to improve the interpretative reliability of the tool and its accuracy in diagnosing delirium. The developmental anchor points chart was formulated and reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts to evaluate content validity and include consideration of sick behaviors within a hospital setting. RESULTS: The CAPD developmental anchor points for the key ages of newborn, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years served as the basis for training bedside nurses in scoring the CAPD for the validation trial and as a multifaceted bedside reference chart to be implemented within a clinical setting. In the current paper, we discuss the lessons learned during implementation, with particular emphasis on the importance of collaboration with the bedside nurse, the challenges of establishing a developmental baseline, and further questions about delirium diagnosis in children. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The CAPD with developmental anchor points provides a validated, structured, and developmentally informed approach to screening and assessment of delirium in children. With minimal training on the use of the tool, bedside nurses and other pediatric practitioners can reliably identify children at risk for delirium.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child psychiatry; Delirium; Developmental anchor points; Pediatric critical care
Authors: Albert F G Leentjens; Jan N M Schieveld; Maeve Leonard; Richel Lousberg; Frans R J Verhey; David J Meagher Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Chani Traube; Gabrielle Silver; Julia Kearney; Anita Patel; Thomas M Atkinson; Margaret J Yoon; Sari Halpert; Julie Augenstein; Laura E Sickles; Chunshan Li; Bruce Greenwald Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Nathalie J J F Janssen; Eva Y L Tan; Marian Staal; Eveline P C J Janssen; Piet L J M Leroy; Richel Lousberg; Jim van Os; Jan N M Schieveld Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-05-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jan N M Schieveld; Piet L J M Leroy; Jim van Os; Joost Nicolai; Gijs D Vos; Albert F G Leentjens Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Gabrielle Silver; Chani Traube; Linda M Gerber; Xuming Sun; Julia Kearney; Anita Patel; Bruce Greenwald Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Chani Traube; Gabrielle Silver; Ron W Reeder; Hannah Doyle; Emily Hegel; Heather A Wolfe; Christopher Schneller; Melissa G Chung; Leslie A Dervan; Jane L DiGennaro; Sandra D W Buttram; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Kate Madden; Mary E Hartman; Mary L deAlmeida; Karen Walson; Erwin Ista; Manuel A Baarslag; Rosanne Salonia; John Beca; Debbie Long; Yu Kawai; Ira M Cheifetz; Javier Gelvez; Edward J Truemper; Rebecca L Smith; Megan E Peters; A M Iqbal O'Meara; Sarah Murphy; Abdulmohsen Bokhary; Bruce M Greenwald; Michael J Bell Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Anita K Patel; Katherine V Biagas; Eunice C Clarke; Linda M Gerber; Elizabeth Mauer; Gabrielle Silver; Paul Chai; Rozelle Corda; Chani Traube Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Chani Traube; Linda M Gerber; Elizabeth A Mauer; Keshia Small; Larisa Broglie; Yogi Raj Chopra; Christine N Duncan; Christen L Ebens; Julie C Fitzgerald; Jason L Freedman; Michelle P Hudspeth; Caitlin Hurley; Kris M Mahadeo; Jennifer McArthur; Miriam C Shapiro; Matthew P Sharron; Donna A Wall; Matt S Zinter; Bruce M Greenwald; Gabrielle Silver; Farid Boulad Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 6.244