AIM: To evaluate the impact on glucose variability (GLUCV) of an nurse-implemented insulin infusion protocol when compared with a conventional insulin treatment during the day-to-day clinical activity. METHODS: We enrolled 44 type 2 diabetic patients (n = 32 males; n = 12 females) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and randomy assigned to standard asubcutaneous insulin treatment (n = 23) or a nurse-implemented continuous intravenous insulin infusion protocol (n = 21). We utilized some parameters of GLUCV representing well-known surrogate markers of prognosis, i.e., glucose standard deviation (SD), the mean daily δ glucose (mean of daily difference between maximum and minimum glucose), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose, expressed as percent glucose (SD)/glucose (mean). RESULTS: At the admission, first fasting blood glucose, pharmacological treatments (insulin and/or anti-diabetic drugs) prior to entering the study and basal glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were observed in the two groups treated with subcutaneous or intravenous insulin infusion, respectively. When compared with patients submitted to standard therapy, insulin-infused patients showed both increased first 24-h (median 6.9 mmol/L vs 5.7 mmol/L P < 0.045) and overall hospitalizationδ glucose (median 10.9 mmol/L vs 9.3 mmol/L, P < 0.028), with a tendency to a significant increase in first 24-h glycaemic CV (23.1% vs 19.6%, P < 0.053). Severe hypoglycaemia was rare (14.3%), and it was observed only in 3 patients receiving insulin infusion therapy. HbA1c values measured during hospitalization and 3 mo after discharge did not differ in the two groups of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our pilot data suggest that no real benefit in terms of GLUCV is observed when routinely managing blood glucose by insulin infusion therapy in type 2 diabetic ACS hospitalized patients in respect to conventional insulin treatment.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To evaluate the impact on glucose variability (GLUCV) of an nurse-implemented insulin infusion protocol when compared with a conventional insulin treatment during the day-to-day clinical activity. METHODS: We enrolled 44 type 2 diabeticpatients (n = 32 males; n = 12 females) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and randomy assigned to standard a subcutaneous insulin treatment (n = 23) or a nurse-implemented continuous intravenous insulin infusion protocol (n = 21). We utilized some parameters of GLUCV representing well-known surrogate markers of prognosis, i.e., glucose standard deviation (SD), the mean daily δ glucose (mean of daily difference between maximum and minimum glucose), and the coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose, expressed as percent glucose (SD)/glucose (mean). RESULTS: At the admission, first fasting blood glucose, pharmacological treatments (insulin and/or anti-diabetic drugs) prior to entering the study and basal glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were observed in the two groups treated with subcutaneous or intravenous insulin infusion, respectively. When compared with patients submitted to standard therapy, insulin-infused patients showed both increased first 24-h (median 6.9 mmol/L vs 5.7 mmol/L P < 0.045) and overall hospitalization δ glucose (median 10.9 mmol/L vs 9.3 mmol/L, P < 0.028), with a tendency to a significant increase in first 24-h glycaemic CV (23.1% vs 19.6%, P < 0.053). Severe hypoglycaemia was rare (14.3%), and it was observed only in 3 patients receiving insulin infusion therapy. HbA1c values measured during hospitalization and 3 mo after discharge did not differ in the two groups of treatment. CONCLUSION: Our pilot data suggest that no real benefit in terms of GLUCV is observed when routinely managing blood glucose by insulin infusion therapy in type 2 diabetic ACS hospitalized patients in respect to conventional insulin treatment.
Authors: Shilpa Shetty; Silvio E Inzucchi; Philip A Goldberg; Dawn Cooper; Mark D Siegel; Shyoko Honiden Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: P Petursson; J Herlitz; K Caidahl; S Gudbjörnsdottir; T Karlsson; E Perers; H Sjöland; M Hartford Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Philip A Goldberg; Mark D Siegel; Robert S Sherwin; Joshua I Halickman; Michelle Lee; Valerie A Bailey; Sandy L Lee; James D Dziura; Silvio E Inzucchi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Fausto Avanzini; Giuseppe Marelli; Walter Donzelli; Loredana Sorbara; Enzo Palazzo; Laura Bellato; Elena Lucia Colombo; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Emma Riva; Mario De Martini Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 3.908