Alyssa Pozniak1, Lois Olinger2, Victoria Shier3. 1. Associate at Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA. 2. Senior Study Director at Westat, Rockville, MD. 3. Graduate student at Pardee RAND Graduate School.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the incidence of diabetes increases, there is growing concern about the adequacy of reimbursement levels for delivering comprehensive diabetes care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate physicians' perceptions of the adequacy of reimbursement, as well as resources (eg, staff, facilities, materials), for their treatment of diabetic patients. METHODS: A qualitative exploration using a Web-based survey of 300 physicians (200 primary care providers and 100 endocrinologists) and an online discussion group of 12 physicians, focusing on 10 services recommended by the American Diabetes Association that may be prone to underreimbursement. The 10 services were matched with 4 general diabetes care categories to assess the adequacy of care delivery. RESULTS: The majority of physician study participants perceived that most of the 10 identified services are inadequately reimbursed-83% to 95% of physicians said Medicaid reimbursement was inadequate, 75% to 89% for Medicare reimbursement, and 67% to 86% for private insurance reimbursement-leading them to spend less time with each patient. This reduction in time was a limiting factor to providing comprehensive diabetes care. The survey also revealed differences between endocrinologists and primary care physicians; for example, medical nutrition therapy was offered by 50% of endocrinology practices compared with only 29.5% of primary care practices. CONCLUSION: This study confirms previous findings that physicians perceive current reimbursement for diabetes care as too low, which limits their ability to perform all the tasks necessary to deliver comprehensive diabetes care.
BACKGROUND: As the incidence of diabetes increases, there is growing concern about the adequacy of reimbursement levels for delivering comprehensive diabetes care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate physicians' perceptions of the adequacy of reimbursement, as well as resources (eg, staff, facilities, materials), for their treatment of diabeticpatients. METHODS: A qualitative exploration using a Web-based survey of 300 physicians (200 primary care providers and 100 endocrinologists) and an online discussion group of 12 physicians, focusing on 10 services recommended by the American Diabetes Association that may be prone to underreimbursement. The 10 services were matched with 4 general diabetes care categories to assess the adequacy of care delivery. RESULTS: The majority of physician study participants perceived that most of the 10 identified services are inadequately reimbursed-83% to 95% of physicians said Medicaid reimbursement was inadequate, 75% to 89% for Medicare reimbursement, and 67% to 86% for private insurance reimbursement-leading them to spend less time with each patient. This reduction in time was a limiting factor to providing comprehensive diabetes care. The survey also revealed differences between endocrinologists and primary care physicians; for example, medical nutrition therapy was offered by 50% of endocrinology practices compared with only 29.5% of primary care practices. CONCLUSION: This study confirms previous findings that physicians perceive current reimbursement for diabetes care as too low, which limits their ability to perform all the tasks necessary to deliver comprehensive diabetes care.
Authors: Arthur R Williams; John C McDougall; Sandra K Bruggeman; Patricia J Erwin; Margo E Kroshus; James M Naessens Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Mary K Rhee; Wrenn Slocum; David C Ziemer; Steven D Culler; Curtiss B Cook; Imad M El-Kebbi; Daniel L Gallina; Catherine Barnes; Lawrence S Phillips Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2005 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Michele Heisler; Reynard R Bouknight; Rodney A Hayward; Dylan M Smith; Eve A Kerr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sara Abdulrhim; Sowndramalingam Sankaralingam; Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim; Mohammed Issam Diab; Mohamed Abdelazim Mohamed Hussain; Hend Al Raey; Mohammed Thahir Ismail; Ahmed Awaisu Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Guntram Schernthaner; Naim Shehadeh; Alexander S Ametov; Anna V Bazarova; Fahim Ebrahimi; Peter Fasching; Andrej Janež; Péter Kempler; Ilze Konrāde; Nebojša M Lalić; Boris Mankovsky; Emil Martinka; Dario Rahelić; Cristian Serafinceanu; Jan Škrha; Tsvetalina Tankova; Žydrūnė Visockienė Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 9.951