Literature DB >> 25125775

Lower-limb kinematics of single-leg squat performance in young adults.

Sean A Horan1, Steven L Watson1, Christopher P Carty2, Massimo Sartori3, Benjamin K Weeks1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the kinematic parameters that characterize good and poor single-leg squat (SLS) performance.
METHODS: A total of 22 healthy young adults free from musculoskeletal impairment were recruited for testing. For each SLS, both two-dimensional video and three-dimensional motion analysis data were collected. Pelvis, hip, and knee angles were calculated using a reliable and validated lower-limb (LL) biomechanical model. Two-dimensional video clips of SLSs were blindly assessed in random order by eight musculoskeletal physiotherapists using a 10-point ordinal scale. To facilitate between-group comparisons, SLS performances were stratified by tertiles corresponding to poor, intermediate, and good SLS performance.
RESULTS: Mean ratings of SLS performance assessed by physiotherapists were 8.3 (SD 0.5), 6.8 (SD 0.7), and 4.0 (SD 0.8) for good, intermediate, and poor squats, respectively. Three-dimensional analysis revealed that people whose SLS performance was assessed as poor exhibited increased hip adduction, reduced knee flexion, and increased medio-lateral displacement of the knee joint centre compared to those whose SLS performance was assessed as good (p≤0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, poor SLS performance is characterized by inadequate knee flexion and excessive frontal plane motion of the knee and hip. Future investigations of SLS performance should consider standardizing knee flexion angle to illuminate other influential kinematic parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kinematics; knee joint; leg injuries; musculoskeletal physiological phonomena

Year:  2014        PMID: 25125775      PMCID: PMC4130400          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2013-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  21 in total

1.  Determination of the optimal elbow axis for evaluation of placement of prostheses.

Authors:  M Stokdijk; C G Meskers; H E Veeger; Y A de Boer; P M Rozing
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Robert S Heidt; Angelo J Colosimo; Scott G McLean; Antonie J van den Bogert; Mark V Paterno; Paul Succop
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Investigation of clinician agreement in evaluating movement quality during unilateral lower extremity functional tasks: a comparison of 2 rating methods.

Authors:  Terese L Chmielewski; Michael J Hodges; Marybeth Horodyski; Mark D Bishop; Bryan P Conrad; Susan M Tillman
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 4.  Sex differences in proximal control of the knee joint.

Authors:  Jurdan Mendiguchia; Kevin R Ford; Carmen E Quatman; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The mechanistic connection between the trunk, hip, knee, and anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.230

6.  Performance on the single-leg squat task indicates hip abductor muscle function.

Authors:  Kay M Crossley; Wan-Jing Zhang; Anthony G Schache; Adam Bryant; Sallie M Cowan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Patellofemoral pain syndrome alters neuromuscular control and kinetics during stair ambulation.

Authors:  Naoko Aminaka; Brian G Pietrosimone; Charles W Armstrong; Andrew Meszaros; Phillip A Gribble
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Utility of the frontal plane projection angle in females with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  John D Willson; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Differences in kinematics of single leg squatting between anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  J Yamazaki; T Muneta; Y J Ju; I Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat.

Authors:  Brian L Zeller; Jean L McCrory; W Ben Kibler; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sex-dependent differences in single-leg squat kinematics and their relationship to squat depth in physically active individuals.

Authors:  Magdalena Zawadka; Jakub Smolka; Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska; Edyta Lukasik; Aleksandra Bys; Grzegorz Zielinski; Piotr Gawda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Effect of sex and fatigue on single leg squat kinematics in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Benjamin K Weeks; Christopher P Carty; Sean A Horan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Single leg squat performance in physically and non-physically active individuals: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Silvia Gianola; Greta Castellini; Elena Stucovitz; Alice Nardo; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring a single leg squat.

Authors:  John Ressman; Eva Rasmussen-Barr; Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-11

5.  Influence of Different Load Conditions on Lower Extremity Biomechanics during the Lunge Squat in Novice Men.

Authors:  Lidong Gao; Zhenghui Lu; Minjun Liang; Julien S Baker; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.