Literature DB >> 25125453

Sample size determinations for group-based randomized clinical trials with different levels of data hierarchy between experimental and control arms.

Moonseong Heo1, Alain H Litwin2,3, Oni Blackstock2, Namhee Kim4, Julia H Arnsten1,2,3.   

Abstract

We derived sample size formulae for detecting main effects in group-based randomized clinical trials with different levels of data hierarchy between experimental and control arms. Such designs are necessary when experimental interventions need to be administered to groups of subjects whereas control conditions need to be administered to individual subjects. This type of trial, often referred to as a partially nested or partially clustered design, has been implemented for management of chronic diseases such as diabetes and is beginning to emerge more commonly in wider clinical settings. Depending on the research setting, the level of hierarchy of data structure for the experimental arm can be three or two, whereas that for the control arm is two or one. Such different levels of data hierarchy assume correlation structures of outcomes that are different between arms, regardless of whether research settings require two or three level data structure for the experimental arm. Therefore, the different correlations should be taken into account for statistical modeling and for sample size determinations. To this end, we considered mixed-effects linear models with different correlation structures between experimental and control arms to theoretically derive and empirically validate the sample size formulae with simulation studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  group-based intervention; mixed-effects model; multi-level data; sample size; varying sizes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25125453      PMCID: PMC4329103          DOI: 10.1177/0962280214547381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating models for partially clustered designs.

Authors:  Scott A Baldwin; Daniel J Bauer; Eric Stice; Paul Rohde
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-06

2.  Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment.

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 3.  Group visits: a qualitative review of current research.

Authors:  Raja Jaber; Amy Braksmajer; Jeffrey S Trilling
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Sample size formulae for trials comparing group and individual treatments in a multilevel model.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Statistical power and sample size requirements for three level hierarchical cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; Andrew C Leon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Chronic care clinics for diabetes in primary care: a system-wide randomized trial.

Authors:  E H Wagner; L C Grothaus; N Sandhu; M S Galvin; M McGregor; K Artz; E A Coleman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Efficacy of care management using cluster visits.

Authors:  C N Sadur; N Moline; M Costa; D Michalik; D Mendlowitz; S Roller; R Watson; B E Swain; J V Selby; W C Javorski
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Group-based parent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health.

Authors:  Jane Barlow; Nadja Smailagic; Nick Huband; Verena Roloff; Cathy Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 9.  How the Affordable Care Act will strengthen the nation's primary care foundation.

Authors:  Karen Davis; Melinda Abrams; Kristof Stremikis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Effectiveness of a group outpatient visit model for chronically ill older health maintenance organization members: a 2-year randomized trial of the cooperative health care clinic.

Authors:  John C Scott; Douglas A Conner; Ingrid Venohr; Glenn Gade; Marlene McKenzie; Andrew M Kramer; Lucinda Bryant; Arne Beck
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 1-Design.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Fan Li; John A Gallis; Melanie Prague; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Multilevel Interventions Targeting Obesity: Research Recommendations for Vulnerable Populations.

Authors:  June Stevens; Charlotte Pratt; Josephine Boyington; Cheryl Nelson; Kimberly P Truesdale; Dianne S Ward; Leslie Lytle; Nancy E Sherwood; Thomas N Robinson; Shirley Moore; Shari Barkin; Ying Kuen Cheung; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  Improving the Youth HIV Prevention and Care Cascades: Innovative Designs in the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions.

Authors:  Sylvie Naar; Michael G Hudgens; Ron Brookmeyer; April Idalski Carcone; Jason Chapman; Shrabanti Chowdhury; Andrea Ciaranello; W Scott Comulada; Samiran Ghosh; Keith J Horvath; LaDrea Ingram; Sara LeGrand; Cathy J Reback; Kit Simpson; Bonita Stanton; Tyrel Starks; Dallas Swendeman
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 4.  Recommendations for the analysis of individually randomised controlled trials with clustering in one arm - a case of continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Laura Flight; Annabel Allison; Munyaradzi Dimairo; Ellen Lee; Laura Mandefield; Stephen J Walters
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Cost-efficient designs for three-arm trials with treatment delivered by health professionals: Sample sizes for a combination of nested and crossed designs.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Optimal allocation to treatments in a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

Authors:  Andrea Morciano; Mirjam Moerbeek
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.