P Y Yeung1, L L Wong2, C C Chan3, Jess L M Leung2, C Y Yung3. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Kowloon Hospital, 147A Argyle Street, Hong Kong. 2. Department of Psychiatry, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Hong Kong version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in identification of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Chinese older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Cognition clinic and memory clinic of a public hospital in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 272 participants (dementia, n=130; mild cognitive impairment, n=93; normal controls, n=49) aged 60 years or above were assessed using HK-MoCA. The HK-MoCA scores were validated against expert diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed) criteria for dementia and Petersen's criteria for mild cognitive impairment. Statistical analysis was performed using receiver operating characteristic curve and regression analyses. Additionally, comparison was made with the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Examination and Global Deterioration Scale. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff score for the HK-MoCA to differentiate cognitive impaired persons (mild cognitive impairment and dementia) from normal controls was 21/22 after adjustment of education level, giving a sensitivity of 0.928, specificity of 0.735, and area under the curve of 0.920. Moreover, the cutoff to detect mild cognitive impairment was 21/22 with a sensitivity of 0.828, specificity of 0.735, and area under the curve of 0.847. Score of the Cantonese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination to detect mild cognitive impairment was 26/27 with a sensitivity of 0.785, specificity of 0.816, and area under the curve of 0.857. At the optimal cutoff of 18/19, HK-MoCA identified dementia from controls with a sensitivity of 0.923, specificity of 0.918, and area under the curve of 0.971. CONCLUSION: The HK-MoCA is a useful cognitive screening instrument for use in Chinese older adults in Hong Kong. A score of less than 22 should prompt further diagnostic assessment. It has comparable sensitivity with the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Examination for detection of mild cognitive impairment. It is brief and feasible to conduct in the clinical setting, and can be completed in less than 15 minutes. Thus, HK-MoCA provides an attractive alternative screening instrument to Mini-Mental State Examination which has ceiling effect (ie may fail to detect mild/moderate cognitive impairment in people with high education level or premorbid intelligence) and needs to be purchased due to copyright issues.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Hong Kong version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) in identification of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Chinese older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Cognition clinic and memory clinic of a public hospital in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 272 participants (dementia, n=130; mild cognitive impairment, n=93; normal controls, n=49) aged 60 years or above were assessed using HK-MoCA. The HK-MoCA scores were validated against expert diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed) criteria for dementia and Petersen's criteria for mild cognitive impairment. Statistical analysis was performed using receiver operating characteristic curve and regression analyses. Additionally, comparison was made with the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Examination and Global Deterioration Scale. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff score for the HK-MoCA to differentiate cognitive impairedpersons (mild cognitive impairment and dementia) from normal controls was 21/22 after adjustment of education level, giving a sensitivity of 0.928, specificity of 0.735, and area under the curve of 0.920. Moreover, the cutoff to detect mild cognitive impairment was 21/22 with a sensitivity of 0.828, specificity of 0.735, and area under the curve of 0.847. Score of the Cantonese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination to detect mild cognitive impairment was 26/27 with a sensitivity of 0.785, specificity of 0.816, and area under the curve of 0.857. At the optimal cutoff of 18/19, HK-MoCA identified dementia from controls with a sensitivity of 0.923, specificity of 0.918, and area under the curve of 0.971. CONCLUSION: The HK-MoCA is a useful cognitive screening instrument for use in Chinese older adults in Hong Kong. A score of less than 22 should prompt further diagnostic assessment. It has comparable sensitivity with the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Examination for detection of mild cognitive impairment. It is brief and feasible to conduct in the clinical setting, and can be completed in less than 15 minutes. Thus, HK-MoCA provides an attractive alternative screening instrument to Mini-Mental State Examination which has ceiling effect (ie may fail to detect mild/moderate cognitive impairment in people with high education level or premorbid intelligence) and needs to be purchased due to copyright issues.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognition disorders; Hong Kong; Sensitivity and specificity
Authors: R M Y Wong; R W K Ng; W W Chau; W H Liu; S K H Chow; C Y Tso; N Tang; W-H Cheung Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Angus P Yu; Edwin C Chin; Danny J Yu; Daniel Y Fong; Calvin P Cheng; Xiaoqing Hu; Gao X Wei; Parco M Siu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Pui Hing Chau; Yan Yan Jojo Kwok; Mee Kie Maggie Chan; Ka Yu Daniel Kwan; Kam Lun Wong; Ying Ho Tang; Kan Lung Peter Chau; Sheung Wa Matthew Lau; Yan Yan Yannex Yiu; Mei Yan Fanny Kwong; Wai Ting Thomas Lai; Mun Kit Leung Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Paul Kwok Ming Poon; King Wa Tam; Dexing Zhang; Benjamin Hon Kei Yip; Jean Woo; Samuel Yeung Shan Wong Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Xiaoping Pan; Haobo Chen; Wai-Ling Bickerton; Johnny King Lam Lau; Anthony Pak Hin Kong; Pia Rotshtein; Aihua Guo; Jianxi Hu; Glyn W Humphreys Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.570