| Literature DB >> 25125392 |
Polly E Boon1, Gerda van Donkersgoed2, Despo Christodoulou3, Amélie Crépet4, Laura D'Addezio5, Virginie Desvignes6, Bengt-Göran Ericsson7, Francesco Galimberti8, Eleni Ioannou-Kakouri9, Bodil Hamborg Jensen10, Irena Rehurkova11, Josselin Rety12, Jiri Ruprich13, Salomon Sand14, Claire Stephenson15, Anita Strömberg16, Aida Turrini17, Hilko van der Voet18, Popi Ziegler19, Paul Hamey20, Jacob D van Klaveren21.
Abstract
The practicality was examined of performing a cumulative dietary exposure assessment according to the requirements of the EFSA guidance on probabilistic modelling. For this the acute and chronic cumulative exposure to triazole pesticides was estimated using national food consumption and monitoring data of eight European countries. Both the acute and chronic cumulative dietary exposures were calculated according to two model runs (optimistic and pessimistic) as recommended in the EFSA guidance. The exposures obtained with these model runs differed substantially for all countries, with the highest exposures obtained with the pessimistic model run. In this model run, animal commodities including cattle milk and different meat types, entered in the exposure calculations at the level of the maximum residue limit (MRL), contributed most to the exposure. We conclude that application of the optimistic model run on a routine basis for cumulative assessments is feasible. The pessimistic model run is laborious and the exposure results could be too far from reality. More experience with this approach is needed to stimulate the discussion of the feasibility of all the requirements, especially the inclusion of MRLs of animal commodities which seem to result in unrealistic conclusions regarding their contribution to the dietary exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Acute exposure; Chronic exposure; Cumulative Assessment Group; Cumulative dietary exposure; EFSA; Probabilistic modelling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25125392 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.08.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem Toxicol ISSN: 0278-6915 Impact factor: 6.023