Literature DB >> 25125008

Relationship between fractional flow reserve and residual plaque volume and clinical outcomes after optimal drug-eluting stent implantation: insight from intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis.

Tsuyoshi Ito1, Tomomitsu Tani2, Hiroshi Fujita2, Nobuyuki Ohte2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The underlying cause of FFR reduction and prognostic impact of FFR after optimal DES implantation remain unknown. The study aims were to use intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to investigate the mechanism responsible for reduced fractional flow reserve (FFR) after optimal drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation and to evaluate FFR effect on clinical outcomes after optimal percutaneous coronary intervention with DES.
METHODS: Ninety-seven patients treated with optimal DES implantation under IVUS and pullback FFR guidance were followed clinically (median 17.8 months). Post-stenting IVUS examination and pullback FFR recording were performed, and angiographic and IVUS parameters associated with reduced FFR were evaluated. The composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization, was analyzed.
RESULTS: Regression analysis showed inverse correlations between post-stent FFR and residual plaque volume index (r=-0.40, p<0.01) and residual percent plaque volume (r=-0.68, p<0.01) in IVUS but no correlation of minimal lesion diameter with quantitative coronary angiography (r=0.07, p=0.50) or IVUS-derived minimal stent area (r=0.02, p=0.84). MACE was observed in 10 patients (10.3%), and FFR after optimal stenting was significantly lower in this group (0.86 ± 0.04 vs 0.91 ± 0.04, p<0.01). The optimal FFR threshold for predicting MACE was 0.90, identified by the receiver operating characteristic curve.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced FFR after optimal DES implantation was associated with residual plaque volume identified by IVUS and future adverse cardiac events.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; Fractional flow reserve; Residual plaque volume

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25125008     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Clinical Significance of Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Chandra P Ojha; Ahmed Ibrahim; Timir K Paul; Venkatachalam Mulukutla; Harsha S Nagarajarao
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mathias Wolfrum; Gregor Fahrni; Giovanni Luigi de Maria; Guido Knapp; Nick Curzen; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Georg M Fröhlich; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Lower Level of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol is Associated with a Higher Increase in the Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Fixed-dose Rosuvastatin.

Authors:  Takehiro Hashikata; Taiki Tojo; Yusuke Muramatsu; Toshimitsu Sato; Ryota Kakizaki; Teruyoshi Nemoto; Kazuhiro Fujiyoshi; Sayaka Namba; Lisa Kitasato; Takuya Hashimoto; Ryo Kameda; Takao Shimohama; Minako Yamaoka-Tojo; Junya Ako
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.928

4.  A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

Authors:  Damien Collison; John D McClure; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Comparison of Computed Tomography derived Fractional Flow Reserve to invasive Fractional Flow Reserve in Diagnosis of Functional Coronary Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pradyumna Agasthi; Arun Kanmanthareddy; Charl Khalil; Obiora Egbuche; Vivek Yarlagadda; Rajesh Sachdeva; Reza Arsanjani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Utility of angiography-physiology coregistration maps during percutaneous coronary intervention in clinical practice.

Authors:  Akiko Matsuo; Takeru Kasahara; Makoto Ariyoshi; Daisuke Irie; Koji Isodono; Yoshinori Tsubakimoto; Tomohiko Sakatani; Keiji Inoue; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2020-06-07

Review 7.  Physiologic Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Seokhun Yang; Jinlong Zhang; Bon Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Achievement on Vascular Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Long Chen; Qin Chen; Jiaxin Zhong; Zhen Ye; Mingfang Ye; Yuanming Yan; Lianglong Chen; Yukun Luo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-18

9.  Analysis of the clinical value of fractional flow reserve for prognosis evaluation of patients of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Qingxia Zhao; Zheng Ji; Xia Li; Yali Di; Haojun An; Bin Wei; Liming Yang; Wensheng Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR).

Authors:  Damien Collison; Matthaios Didagelos; Muhammad Aetesam-Ur-Rahman; Samuel Copt; Robert McDade; Peter McCartney; Thomas J Ford; John McClure; Mitchell Lindsay; Aadil Shaukat; Paul Rocchiccioli; Richard Brogan; Stuart Watkins; Margaret McEntegart; Richard Good; Keith Robertson; Patrick O'Boyle; Andrew Davie; Adnan Khan; Stuart Hood; Hany Eteiba; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.