Literature DB >> 25124236

The net clinical benefit of personalized antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Jolanta M Siller-Matula1, Carina Gruber2, Marcel Francesconi2, Cornelia Dechant2, Bernd Jilma3, Georg Delle-Karth1, Katharina Grohs4, Andrea Podczeck-Schweighofer2, Günter Christ2.   

Abstract

This was a prospective study comparing two groups: personalized and non-personalized treatment with P2Y12 receptor blockers during a 12-month follow-up. We aimed to investigate whether personalized antiplatelet treatment in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) improves clinical outcome. Platelet reactivity was assessed by adenosine diphosphate induced aggregation using a multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) in 798 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with HTPR received up to four repeated loading doses of clopidogrel or prasugrel in the personalized treatment group (n=403), whereas no change in the treatment strategy was undertaken in patients with HTPR in the non-personalized treatment group (n=395). There were fewer major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the personalized treatment group than in the non-personalized treatment group (7.4% compared with 15.3% respectively; P<0.001). The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the relative risk to develop MACE was 51% lower in the personalized treatment group as compared with the non-personalized treatment group [hazard ratio (HR)=0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31-0.77; P<0.001]. Similarly, there was a clear net benefit of the personalized antiplatelet treatment over the non-personalized treatment (ischemic and bleedings events: 8.2% versus 18.7% respectively; HR=0.46; 95%CI: 0.29-0.70; P<0.001). Further analysis indicated that patients with aggregation values within the therapeutic window (21-49 units) experienced the lowest event rates (stent thrombosis and major bleeding: 2.5%) as compared with poor responders (≥50 units: 5.4%) or ultra-responders (0-20 units: 5.2%). In conclusion, personalized antiplatelet treatment might improve patients' outcome without increasing bleeding complications compared with the non-personalized treatment during a 12-month follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25124236     DOI: 10.1042/CS20140310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  7 in total

1.  Immature platelet fraction and high-on treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Monica Verdoia; Chiara Sartori; Patrizia Pergolini; Matteo Nardin; Roberta Rolla; Lucia Barbieri; Alon Schaffer; Paolo Marino; Giorgio Bellomo; Harry Suryapranata; Giuseppe De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Impact of aging on platelet reactivity in diabetic patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Monica Verdoia; Patrizia Pergolini; Matteo Nardin; Roberta Rolla; Francesco Tonon; Elvin Kedhi; Harry Suryapranata; Alessandro Carriero; Giuseppe De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Impact of diabetes on immature platelets fraction and its relationship with platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Monica Verdoia; Patrizia Pergolini; Matteo Nardin; Roberta Rolla; Lucia Barbieri; Alon Schaffer; Paolo Marino; Giorgio Bellomo; Harry Suryapranata; Giuseppe De Luca
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Abciximab as a bridging strategy to overcome morphine-prasugrel interaction in STEMI patients.

Authors:  Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Simon Specht; Jacek Kubica; Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Raffaele De Caterina; Eva-Luise Hobl; Bernd Jilma; Günter Christ; Irene M Lang
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Incidence, predictors, and prognosis of premature discontinuation or switch of prasugrel or ticagrelor: the ATLANTIS - SWITCH study.

Authors:  Max-Paul Winter; Dirk von Lewinski; Markus Wallner; Florian Prüller; Ewald Kolesnik; Christian Hengstenberg; Jolanta M Siller-Matula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Authors:  Mateusz P Jeżewski; Michał J Kubisa; Ceren Eyileten; Salvatore De Rosa; Günter Christ; Maciej Lesiak; Ciro Indolfi; Aurel Toma; Jolanta M Siller-Matula; Marek Postuła
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Personalized antiplatelet therapy with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: benefits and pitfalls.

Authors:  Max-Paul Winter; Marek Koziński; Jacek Kubica; Daniel Aradi; Jolanta M Siller-Matula
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 1.426

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.