Literature DB >> 25123922

Surface chemistry dependent immunostimulative potential of porous silicon nanoplatforms.

Mohammad-Ali Shahbazi1, Tahia D Fernández2, Ermei M Mäkilä3, Xavier Le Guével4, Cristobalina Mayorga2, Martti H Kaasalainen2, Jarno J Salonen2, Jouni T Hirvonen5, Hélder A Santos6.   

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) have been suggested for immunotherapy applications in order to optimize the delivery of immuno-stimulative or -suppressive molecules. However, low attention towards the impact of the NPs' physicochemical properties has presented a major hurdle for developing efficient immunotherapeutic agents. Here, the effects of porous silicon (PSi) NPs with different surface chemistries were evaluated on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) and lymphocytes in order to highlight the importance of the NPs selection in immuno-stimulative or -suppressive treatment. Although all the PSi NPs showed high biocompatibility, only thermally oxidized PSi (TOPSi) and thermally hydrocarbonized PSi (THCPSi) NPs were able to induce very high rate of immunoactivation by enhancing the expression of surface co-stimulatory markers of the MDDCs (CD80, CD83, CD86, and HLA-DR), inducing T-cell proliferation, and also the secretion of interleukins (IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α). These results indicated a balanced increase in the secretion of Th1, Th2, and Treg cytokines. Moreover, undecylenic acid functionalized THCPSi, as well as poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic acid) conjugated to (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane functionalized thermally carbonized PSi and polyethyleneimine conjugated undecylenic acid functionalized THCPSi NPs showed moderate immunoactivation due to the mild increase in the above-mentioned markers. By contrast, thermally carbonized PSi (TCPSi) and (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane functionalized TCPSi NPs did not induce any immunological responses, suggesting that their application could be in the delivery of immunosuppressive molecules. Overall, our findings suggest all the NPs containing more nitrogen or oxygen on the outermost backbone layer have lower immunostimulatory effect than NPs with higher C-H structures on the surface.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-stimulatory signal; Immune response; Interleukins; Monocyte-derived dendritic cells; Porous silicon nanoparticles; T-cell proliferation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123922     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  12 in total

Review 1.  Nanoplatforms for Targeted Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery: A Review of Platform Materials and Stimuli-Responsive Release and Targeting Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yuzhe Sun; Edward Davis
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  The next-generation nicotine vaccine: a novel and potent hybrid nanoparticle-based nicotine vaccine.

Authors:  Yun Hu; Daniel Smith; Evan Frazier; Reece Hoerle; Marion Ehrich; Chenming Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Modulation of Immune Response Using Engineered Nanoparticle Surfaces.

Authors:  Daniel F Moyano; Yuanchang Liu; Dan Peer; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 4.  Improving Vaccine and Immunotherapy Design Using Biomaterials.

Authors:  Michelle L Bookstaver; Shannon J Tsai; Jonathan S Bromberg; Christopher M Jewell
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 5.  Engineering nanoparticles to overcome barriers to immunotherapy.

Authors:  Randall Toy; Krishnendu Roy
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 6.  Interactions Between Nanoparticles and Dendritic Cells: From the Perspective of Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jianbo Jia; Yi Zhang; Yan Xin; Cuijuan Jiang; Bing Yan; Shumei Zhai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Biohybrid Vaccines for Improved Treatment of Aggressive Melanoma with Checkpoint Inhibitor.

Authors:  Flavia Fontana; Manlio Fusciello; Christianne Groeneveldt; Cristian Capasso; Jacopo Chiaro; Sara Feola; Zehua Liu; Ermei M Mäkilä; Jarno J Salonen; Jouni T Hirvonen; Vincenzo Cerullo; Hélder A Santos
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 8.  Bioengineering Strategies for Developing Vaccines against Respiratory Viral Diseases.

Authors:  Shalini Iyer; Rajesh Yadav; Smriti Agarwal; Shashank Tripathi; Rachit Agarwal
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 9.  Methods for improving the immunogenicity and efficacy of cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Lorenzo Pilla; Soldano Ferrone; Cristina Maccalli
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 10.  Nanosystems for Improved Targeted Therapies in Melanoma.

Authors:  Cristina Beiu; Calin Giurcaneanu; Alexandru Mihai Grumezescu; Alina Maria Holban; Liliana Gabriela Popa; Mara Mădălina Mihai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.