Literature DB >> 25123822

A randomized comparative trial of two decision tools for pregnant women with prior cesareans.

Karen B Eden, Nancy A Perrin, Kimberly K Vesco, Jeanne-Marie Guise.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate tools to help pregnant women with prior cesareans make informed decisions about having trials of labor.
DESIGN: Randomized comparative trial.
SETTING: A research assistant with a laptop met the women in quiet locations at clinics and at health fairs. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (N = 131) who had one prior cesarean and were eligible for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) participated one time between 2005 and 2007.
METHODS: Women were randomized to receive either an evidence-based, interactive decision aid or two evidence-based educational brochures about cesarean delivery and VBAC. Effect on the decision-making process was assessed before and after the interventions.
RESULTS: Compared to baseline, women in both groups felt more informed (F = 23.8, p < .001), were more clear about their birth priorities (F = 9.7, p = .002), felt more supported (F = 9.8, p = .002, and overall reported less conflict (F = 18.1, p < 0.001) after receiving either intervention. Women in their third trimesters reported greater clarity around birth priorities after using the interactive decision aid than women given brochures (F = 9.8, p = .003).
CONCLUSION: Although both decision tools significantly reduced conflict around the birth decision compared to baseline, more work is needed to understand which format, the interactive decision aid or paper brochures, are more effective early and late in pregnancy.
© 2014 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VBAC; decision aid; decision support techniques; pregnancy; women's preferences

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123822     DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs        ISSN: 0090-0311


  9 in total

1.  Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; William A Grobman; Allison S Bryant; Laura Norrell; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna Altshuler; Mari-Paule Thiet; Juan Gonzalez; Peter Bacchetti; Michelle Moghadassi; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Effect of a Patient-Centered Decision Support Tool on Rates of Trial of Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery: The PROCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Anjali J Kaimal; Cinthia Blat; Juan Gonzalez; Mari-Paule Thiet; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna L Altshuler; Allison S Bryant; Peter Bacchetti; William A Grobman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.

Authors:  Innie Chen; Newton Opiyo; Emma Tavender; Sameh Mortazhejri; Tamara Rader; Jennifer Petkovic; Sharlini Yogasingam; Monica Taljaard; Sugandha Agarwal; Malinee Laopaiboon; Jason Wasiak; Suthit Khunpradit; Pisake Lumbiganon; Russell L Gruen; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

4.  Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.

Authors:  Aireen Wingert; Cydney Johnson; Robin Featherstone; Meghan Sebastianski; Lisa Hartling; R Douglas Wilson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Implementation and evaluation of nonclinical interventions for appropriate use of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a multisite hybrid effectiveness-implementation type III trial.

Authors:  Alexandre Dumont; Ana Pilar Betrán; Charles Kaboré; Myriam de Loenzien; Pisake Lumbiganon; Meghan A Bohren; Quoc Nhu Hung Mac; Newton Opiyo; Guillermo Carroli; Kristi Sidney Annerstedt; Valéry Ridde; Ramón Escuriet; Michael Robson; Claudia Hanson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  The effectiveness of decision aids for pregnancy related decision-making in women with pre-pregnancy morbidity; systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Whybrow; Louise M Webster; Paul T Seed; Jane Sandall; Lucy C Chappell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Patient decision aid for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) versus planned repeat cesarean delivery: a quasi-experimental pre-post study.

Authors:  Kartik K Venkatesh; Suzanne Brodney; Michael J Barry; Jamie Jackson; Kiira M Lyons; Asha N Talati; Thomas S Ivester; Maria C Munoz; John M Thorp; Wanda K Nicholson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Changes in perceived knowledge about childbirth among pregnant women participating in the Senses of Birth intervention in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Luísa M M Fernandes; Sônia Lansky; Bernardo J Oliveira; Amélia A L Friche; Christine T Bozlak; Benjamin A Shaw
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Public target interventions to reduce the inappropriate use of medicines or medical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leesa Lin; Prima Alam; Elizabeth Fearon; James R Hargreaves
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 7.327

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.