Literature DB >> 25123526

Volume assured versus pressure preset non-invasive ventilation for compensated ventilatory failure in COPD.

Nicholas S Oscroft1, Rebecca Chadwick2, Michael G Davies2, Timothy G Quinnell2, Ian E Smith2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The addition of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to standard therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with compensated ventilatory failure (CVF) is reported to have beneficial effects. Compliance with NIV is an important factor. Volume assured NIV (va-NIV) may improve compliance and ventilation during sleep by automatically titrating ventilatory pressures.
METHODS: A prospective single centre, randomised, parallel group trial comparing va-NIV and pressure preset NIV (pp-NIV) in COPD patients with CVF naïve to domiciliary NIV was performed (ISCRTN91892415). The primary outcomes were arterial blood gases, mean overnight oximetry (mSpO2) and compliance after three months. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary function, exercise capacity and health-related quality of life assessment.
RESULTS: Forty patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The va-NIV median target minute ventilation was 8.4 L/min and pp-NIV median inspiratory pressure was 28 cmH2O. There were no significant differences between groups in primary or secondary outcomes after three months. Mean (SD) PaO2 8.7 (1.7) versus 7.9 (1.7) kPa (p = 0.19), PaCO2 6.7 (0.5) versus 7.3 (1.1) kPa (p = 0.1), mSpO2 89.7 (4.2) versus 89.8 (3.9) % (p = 0.95), compliance 5.0 (3.1) versus 4.7 (3.2) hours (p = 0.8) in va-NIV versus pp-NIV respectively. Patients allocated va-NIV spent fewer days in hospital initiating therapy 3.3 (1.6) versus 5.2 (2.8) (p = 0.02). Both groups showed significant improvements in PaCO2 and mSpO2 after three months treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Domiciliary va-NIV and pp-NIV have similar effects on physiological outcomes in COPD patients with CVF and both are well tolerated.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Chronic ventilatory failure; Non-invasive ventilation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123526     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  5 in total

1.  Automatic EPAP intelligent volume-assured pressure support is effective in patients with chronic respiratory failure: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Jeremy E Orr; John Coleman; Gerard J Criner; Krishna M Sundar; Sheila C Tsai; Adam V Benjafield; Maureen E Crocker; Leslee Willes; Atul Malhotra; Robert L Owens; Lisa F Wolfe
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 6.424

Review 2.  Home noninvasive ventilatory support for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patient selection and perspectives.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Storre; Jens Callegari; Friederike Sophie Magnet; Sarah Bettina Schwarz; Marieke Leontine Duiverman; Peter Jan Wijkstra; Wolfram Windisch
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-02-28

3.  Assistive technologies for home NIV in patients with COPD: feasibility and positive experience with remote-monitoring and volume-assured auto-EPAP NIV mode.

Authors:  Grace McDowell; Maksymilian Sumowski; Hannah Toellner; Sophia Karok; Ciara O'Dwyer; James Hornsby; David J Lowe; Christopher M Carlin
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-11

4.  Effect of average volume-assured pressure support treatment on health-related quality of life in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Doaa M Magdy; Ahmed Metwally
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 5.  Novel modes of non-invasive ventilation in chronic respiratory failure: a narrative review.

Authors:  Neeraj Mukesh Shah; Rebecca F D'Cruz; Patrick B Murphy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.