| Literature DB >> 25123355 |
Satoshi Miyazaki, Miho Yoshimura, Ryota Saiki, Yoshinobu Hayashi, Osamu Kitade, Kazuki Tsuji, Kiyoto Maekawa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In insect societies, intracolonial genetic variation is predicted to affect both colony efficiency and reproductive skew. However, because the effects of genetic variation on these two colony characteristics have been tested independently, it remains unclear whether they are affected by genetic variation independently or in a related manner. Here we test the effect of genetic variation on colony efficiency and reproductive skew in a rhinotermitid termite, Reticulitermes speratus, a species in which female-female pairs can facultatively found colonies. We established colonies using two types of female-female pairs: colonies founded by sisters (i.e., sister-pair colonies) and those founded by females from different colonies (i.e., unrelated-pair colonies). Colony growth and reproductive skew were then compared between the two types of incipient colonies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25123355 PMCID: PMC4236541 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-014-0177-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Caste developmental pathway of(a), and the thorax of N1 (b) and W1 (c). L, N and W indicate larva, nymph and worker, respectively. Note that N1 has wing buds on meso- and metanotum. Scale bars indicate 0.2 mm.
Effects of social characters on colony efficiency (the number of termites)
| Founders’ survival rate | colony type (CT) | 1.835 | 0.067 |
| Colony size | colony type (CT) | −2.017 | 0.044* |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | −1.048 | 0.295 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | 1.094 | 0.274 |
| Nymph/worker ratio | colony type (CT) | −0.790 | 0.430 |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | −0.533 | 0.594 |
| | colony size (CS) | 0.306 | 0.759 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | 1.149 | 0.251 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | 1.265 | 0.206 |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | 0.280 | 0.779 |
| | interaction between CT, FSR & CS | −1.433 | 0.152 |
| Number of soldiers | colony type (CT) | 0.405 | 0.685 |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | 0.421 | 0.674 |
| | colony size (CS) | −0.060 | 0.952 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | −0.181 | 0.856 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | −0.872 | 0.383 |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | 0.010 | 0.992 |
| | interaction between CT, FSR & CS | 0.374 | 0.708 |
| Number of nymphoids | colony type (CT) | 0.165 | 0.869 |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | −0.725 | 0.469 |
| | colony size (CS) | −0.623 | 0.533 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | −0.216 | 0.829 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | 0.119 | 0.905 |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | −0.029 | 0.977 |
| interaction between CT, FSR & CS | −0.084 | 0.933 |
Social characters include colony types (i.e., sister-pair and unrelated-pair colonies), founders’ survival rate, colony size and their interactions. “*” indicates P < 0.05 in generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analyses.
Figure 2Effects of relatedness between founding females on the colony growth and caste ratio. (a) The colony size (means ± S.D. values) at 15 months after colony establishment. The sizes were significantly different between colony types (generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis, p = 0.044, Table 1). (b) Caste ratio between colony types in each colony at 15 months after colony establishment. The nymph/worker ratio did not significantly differ between colony types (GLMM analysis, p = 0.430, Table 1). Numerical values in the bar indicate numbers of colonies examined. SP and URP indicate sister-pair and unrelated-pair colonies, respectively.
Effects of social characters on reproductive skew
| Skew of offspring production | colony type (CT) | 1.952 | 0.051 |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | 1.558 | 0.119 |
| | colony size (CS) | 1.141 | 0.254 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | −1.738 | 0.082 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | −1.585 | 0.113 |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | −1.534 | 0.125 |
| | interaction between CT, FSR & CS | 1.493 | 0.136 |
| Skew of juvenile production | colony type (CT) | 1.482 | 0.138 |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | 0.422 | 0.673 |
| | colony size (CS) | 0.301 | 0.763 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | −1.336 | 0.182 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | −1.365 | 0.172 |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | −0.342 | 0.733 |
| | interaction between CT, FSR & CS | 1.283 | 0.199 |
| Skew of worker production | colony type (CT) | 1.232 | 0.218 |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | 1.131 | 0.258 |
| | colony size (CS) | 1.232 | 0.218 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | −1.434 | 0.152 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | −1.315 | 0.189 |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | −1.581 | 0.114 |
| | interaction between CT, FSR & CS | 1.502 | 0.133 |
| Skew of nymph production | colony type (CT) | 1.997 | 0.046* |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | −0.230 | 0.818 |
| | colony size (CS) | 0.175 | 0.861 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | −1.197 | 0.231 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | −2.664 | 0.008** |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | 0.049 | 0.961 |
| | interaction between CT, FSR & CS | 2.152 | 0.031* |
| Skew of soldier production | colony type (CT) | −0.001 | 0.999 |
| | founders’ survival rate (FSR) | 0.452 | 0.651 |
| | colony size (CS) | 0.287 | 0.774 |
| | interaction between CT & FSR | 0.001 | 0.999 |
| | interaction between CT & CS | 0 | 1.000 |
| | interaction between FSR & CS | −0.211 | 0.833 |
| interaction between CT, FSR & CS | 0 | 1.000 |
For the explanatory values, see Table 1. “*” and “**” indicates P < 0.05 and 0.01 in GLMM analyses, respectively. Skew of nymphoids could not be analyzed because of small numbers of colonies producing nymphoids (3 of 13 sister-pair colonies and 3 of 14 unrelated-pair ones, see Additional files 1, 2 and 3).
Figure 3Proportions of offspring (including all individuals except for queens), workers, and nymphs produced by one of paired founding females. The proportions (means ± S.D. values) were compared between sister-pair (SP, black) and unrelated-pair (URP, white) colonies using GLMM analyses. Numerical values in the bar indicate numbers of colonies examined.