Snehal Dabir1, Shahab Babakoohi, Amy Kluge, James J Morrow, Adam Kresak, Michael Yang, David MacPherson, Gary Wildey, Afshin Dowlati. 1. *Division of Hematology and Oncology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; †Department of Medicine, MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; ‡Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; §Division of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; and ‖Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in defining the somatic mutations associated with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Unfortunately, a serious blockade to genomic analyses of this disease is a limited access to tumors because surgery is rarely performed. We used our clinical/pathologic database of SCLC patients to determine the availability of biopsy specimens that could be used for genomic studies and to identify tumors for initial oncogene analysis. METHODS: DNA was extracted from six tumors, three primary and three metastatic, and analyzed by SEQUENOM platform technology. RESULTS: Primary-resected tumor tissue represents less than 3% of all diagnostic specimens in this disease, highlighting the limited access to tissue sufficient for comprehensive genomic analyses. We identified an activating M918T RET somatic mutation in a metastatic SCLC tumor specimen. Bioinformatic search identified RET mutations in other SCLC studies. Stable overexpression of both mutant M918T and wild-type RET in two SCLC cell lines, H1048 and SW1271, activated ERK signaling, MYC expression, and increased cell proliferation, particularly by mutant RET. Stable cells became sensitized to the RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors, vandetanib and ponatinib. Further analysis of RET mRNA expression in SCLC revealed wide variability in both cells and tumors, and SCLC cells demonstrated significantly higher RET expression compared with adenocarcinoma lung cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a subpopulation of SCLC patients may derive benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting RET. Coupled with the presence of RET fusion proteins in non-small-cell lung cancer, our data indicate an emerging role for RET in SCLC.
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in defining the somatic mutations associated with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Unfortunately, a serious blockade to genomic analyses of this disease is a limited access to tumors because surgery is rarely performed. We used our clinical/pathologic database of SCLCpatients to determine the availability of biopsy specimens that could be used for genomic studies and to identify tumors for initial oncogene analysis. METHODS: DNA was extracted from six tumors, three primary and three metastatic, and analyzed by SEQUENOM platform technology. RESULTS: Primary-resected tumor tissue represents less than 3% of all diagnostic specimens in this disease, highlighting the limited access to tissue sufficient for comprehensive genomic analyses. We identified an activating M918TRET somatic mutation in a metastatic SCLC tumor specimen. Bioinformatic search identified RET mutations in other SCLC studies. Stable overexpression of both mutant M918T and wild-type RET in two SCLC cell lines, H1048 and SW1271, activated ERK signaling, MYC expression, and increased cell proliferation, particularly by mutant RET. Stable cells became sensitized to the RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors, vandetanib and ponatinib. Further analysis of RET mRNA expression in SCLC revealed wide variability in both cells and tumors, and SCLC cells demonstrated significantly higher RET expression compared with adenocarcinoma lung cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a subpopulation of SCLCpatients may derive benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting RET. Coupled with the presence of RET fusion proteins in non-small-cell lung cancer, our data indicate an emerging role for RET in SCLC.
Authors: Paul A Bunn; John D Minna; Alexander Augustyn; Adi F Gazdar; Youcef Ouadah; Mark A Krasnow; Anton Berns; Elisabeth Brambilla; Natasha Rekhtman; Pierre P Massion; Matthew Niederst; Martin Peifer; Jun Yokota; Ramaswamy Govindan; John T Poirier; Lauren A Byers; Murry W Wynes; David G McFadden; David MacPherson; Christine L Hann; Anna F Farago; Caroline Dive; Beverly A Teicher; Craig D Peacock; Jane E Johnson; Melanie H Cobb; Hans-Guido Wendel; David Spigel; Julien Sage; Ping Yang; M Catherine Pietanza; Lee M Krug; John Heymach; Peter Ujhazy; Caicun Zhou; Koichi Goto; Afshin Dowlati; Camilla Laulund Christensen; Keunchil Park; Lawrence H Einhorn; Martin J Edelman; Giuseppe Giaccone; David E Gerber; Ravi Salgia; Taofeek Owonikoko; Shakun Malik; Niki Karachaliou; David R Gandara; Ben J Slotman; Fiona Blackhall; Glenwood Goss; Roman Thomas; Charles M Rudin; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Halena R VanDeusen; Johnny R Ramroop; Katherine L Morel; Song Yi Bae; Anjali V Sheahan; Zoi Sychev; Nathan A Lau; Larry C Cheng; Victor M Tan; Zhen Li; Ashley Petersen; John K Lee; Jung Wook Park; Rendong Yang; Justin H Hwang; Ilsa Coleman; Owen N Witte; Colm Morrissey; Eva Corey; Peter S Nelson; Leigh Ellis; Justin M Drake Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Mark D Borromeo; Trisha K Savage; Rahul K Kollipara; Min He; Alexander Augustyn; Jihan K Osborne; Luc Girard; John D Minna; Adi F Gazdar; Melanie H Cobb; Jane E Johnson Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: A Dowlati; M B Lipka; K McColl; S Dabir; M Behtaj; A Kresak; A Miron; M Yang; N Sharma; P Fu; G Wildey Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 32.976