Literature DB >> 25122422

Canadian anaplastic lymphoma kinase study: a model for multicenter standardization and optimization of ALK testing in lung cancer.

Jean-Claude Cutz1, Kenneth J Craddock, Emina Torlakovic, Guilherme Brandao, Ronald F Carter, Gilbert Bigras, Jean Deschenes, Iyare Izevbaye, Zhaolin Xu, Wenda Greer, Yasushi Yatabe, Diana Ionescu, Aly Karsan, Sungmi Jung, Richard S Fraser, Miriam Blumenkrantz, Josee Lavoie, Flechere Fortin, Anna Bojarski, Gilbert B Côté, Janette A van den Berghe, Fariborz Rashid-Kolvear, Martin Trotter, Harmanjatinder S Sekhon, Roula Albadine, Danh Tran-Thanh, Isabelle Gorska, Joan H M Knoll, Jie Xu, Ben Blencowe, A John Iafrate, David M Hwang, Melania Pintilie, Rania Gaspo, Christian Couture, Ming-Sound Tsao.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the standard for diagnosing anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancers for ALK inhibitor therapies. ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) may serve as a screening and alternative diagnostic method. The Canadian ALK (CALK) study was initiated to implement a multicenter optimization and standardization of laboratory developed ALK IHC and FISH tests across 14 hospitals.
METHODS: Twenty-eight lung adenocarcinomas with known ALK status were used as blinded study samples. Thirteen laboratories performed IHC using locally developed staining protocols for 5A4, ALK1, or D5F3 antibodies; results were assessed by H-score. Twelve centers conducted FISH using protocols based on Vysis' ALK break-apart FISH kit. Initial IHC results were used to optimize local IHC protocols, followed by a repeat IHC study to assess the results of standardization. Three laboratories conducted a prospective parallel IHC and FISH analysis on 411 consecutive clinical samples using post-validation optimized assays.
RESULTS: Among study samples, FISH demonstrated 22 consensus ALK+ and six ALK wild type tumors. Preoptimization IHC scores from 12 centers with 5A4 and the percent abnormal cells by FISH from 12 centers showed intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.83 and 0.68, respectively. IHC optimization improved the intraclass correlation coefficients to 0.94. Factors affecting FISH scoring and outliers were identified. Post-optimization concurrent IHC/FISH testing in 373 informative cases revealed 100% sensitivity and specificity for IHC versus FISH.
CONCLUSIONS: Multicenter standardization study may accelerate the implementation of ALK testing protocols across a country/region. Our data support the use of an appropriately validated IHC assay to screen for ALK+ lung cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25122422     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  22 in total

1.  Improving molecular testing and personalized medicine in non-small-cell lung cancer in Ontario.

Authors:  C Lim; H S Sekhon; J C Cutz; D M Hwang; S Kamel-Reid; R F Carter; G da Cunha Santos; T Waddell; M Binnie; M Patel; N Paul; T Chung; A Brade; R El-Maraghi; C Sit; M S Tsao; N B Leighl
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Testing: IHC vs. FISH vs. NGS.

Authors:  Xiaomin Niu; Jody C Chuang; Gerald J Berry; Heather A Wakelee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-11-16

3.  [Statement of the German Society for Pathology and the working group thoracic oncology of the working group oncology/German Cancer Society on ALK testing in NSCLC: Immunohistochemistry and/or FISH?].

Authors:  M von Laffert; P Schirmacher; A Warth; W Weichert; R Büttner; R M Huber; J Wolf; F Griesinger; M Dietel; C Grohé
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  ALK+ lung adenocarcinoma in never smokers and long-term ex-smokers: prevalence and detection by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Andrew S Williams; Wenda Greer; Drew Bethune; Kenneth J Craddock; Gordon Flowerdew; Zhaolin Xu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  Fit-for-Purpose Immunohistochemical Biomarkers.

Authors:  Emina Emilia Torlakovic
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 6.  Diagnosis and Treatment of ALK Aberrations in Metastatic NSCLC.

Authors:  Alex Friedlaender; Giuseppe Banna; Sandip Patel; Alfredo Addeo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 7.  Canadian perspectives: update on inhibition of ALK-positive tumours in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  B Melosky; P Cheema; J Agulnik; R Albadine; D G Bebb; N Blais; R Burkes; C Butts; P B Card; A M Y Chan; V Hirsh; D N Ionescu; R Juergens; W Morzycki; Z Poonja; R Sangha; M Tehfe; M S Tsao; M Vincent; Z Xu; G Liu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  ALK inhibitors, resistance development, clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Rothenstein; N Chooback
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10

10.  An Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Immunohistochemistry-Negative but Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Is Resistant to Crizotinib.

Authors:  Ruoshi Shi; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Ming Li; Olga Ludkovski; Arnavaz Danesh; Christine Ng; Nhu-An Pham; Trevor Pugh; Frances A Shepherd; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.