OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the cardiovascular responses of a novel orthostatic stress test, the passive seated orthostatic stress test (PSOST), with those during passive head-up tilt testing (HUTT). We hypothesized that cardiovascular responses during PSOST would be similar to those during HUTT (the 'gold standard'). METHODS: We tested 15 healthy volunteers, who underwent both PSOST and HUTT during one session in a random order. We measured beat-to-beat blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral resistance, stroke volume, cardiac output, and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity during each test. RESULTS: Blood pressure responses were not significantly different between PSOST and HUTT, except for a significantly lower delayed nadir and 15-min recovery value in systolic arterial pressure during HUTT. HUTT elicited a significantly larger increase in heart rate during all test intervals in comparison with PSOST, as well as a larger decline in stroke volume during almost all test intervals. Responses for the other hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between the tests at any test interval. Repeated HUTT has large inherent variability, which was also evident from the variability in the mean differences on comparing PSOST and HUTT. There was a significant bias for larger heart rate increases (P<0.01) and a greater delayed systolic arterial pressure decline during HUTT. CONCLUSION: We have shown that PSOST and HUTT elicit similar blood pressure and cerebrovascular responses in the early stages of the upright phase. We believe that PSOST is a reasonable surrogate for HUTT in assessing orthostatic hypotension in population groups that are unable to stand for prolonged periods of time.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the cardiovascular responses of a novel orthostatic stress test, the passive seated orthostatic stress test (PSOST), with those during passive head-up tilt testing (HUTT). We hypothesized that cardiovascular responses during PSOST would be similar to those during HUTT (the 'gold standard'). METHODS: We tested 15 healthy volunteers, who underwent both PSOST and HUTT during one session in a random order. We measured beat-to-beat blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral resistance, stroke volume, cardiac output, and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity during each test. RESULTS: Blood pressure responses were not significantly different between PSOST and HUTT, except for a significantly lower delayed nadir and 15-min recovery value in systolic arterial pressure during HUTT. HUTT elicited a significantly larger increase in heart rate during all test intervals in comparison with PSOST, as well as a larger decline in stroke volume during almost all test intervals. Responses for the other hemodynamic variables were not significantly different between the tests at any test interval. Repeated HUTT has large inherent variability, which was also evident from the variability in the mean differences on comparing PSOST and HUTT. There was a significant bias for larger heart rate increases (P<0.01) and a greater delayed systolic arterial pressure decline during HUTT. CONCLUSION: We have shown that PSOST and HUTT elicit similar blood pressure and cerebrovascular responses in the early stages of the upright phase. We believe that PSOST is a reasonable surrogate for HUTT in assessing orthostatic hypotension in population groups that are unable to stand for prolonged periods of time.
Authors: Brett H Shaw; Dave Borrel; Kimiya Sabbaghan; Colton Kum; Yijian Yang; Stephen N Robinovitch; Victoria E Claydon Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Siqi Wang; Jill M Wecht; Bonnie Legg Ditterline; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Matthew T Maher; Alexander T Lombard; Sevda C Aslan; Alexander V Ovechkin; Brielle Bethke; Jordan T H Gunter; Susan J Harkema Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2020-10