| Literature DB >> 25121602 |
Stephanie L Greene1, Theodore J Kisha2, Long-Xi Yu2, Mauricio Parra-Quijano3.
Abstract
A standard conservation strategy for plant genetic resources integrates in situ (on-farm or wild) and ex situ (gene or field bank) approaches. Gene bank managers collect ex situ accessions that represent a comprehensive snap shot of the genetic diversity of in situ populations at a given time and place. Although simple in theory, achieving complementary in situ and ex situ holdings is challenging. Using Trifolium thompsonii as a model insect-pollinated herbaceous perennial species, we used AFLP markers to compare genetic diversity and structure of ex situ accessions collected at two time periods (1995, 2004) from four locations, with their corresponding in situ populations sampled in 2009. Our goal was to assess the complementarity of the two approaches. We examined how gene flow, selection and genetic drift contributed to population change. Across locations, we found no difference in diversity between ex situ and in situ samples. One population showed a decline in genetic diversity over the 15 years studied. Population genetic differentiation among the four locations was significant, but weak. Association tests suggested infrequent, long distance gene flow. Selection and drift occurred, but differences due to spatial effects were three times as strong as differences attributed to temporal effects, and suggested recollection efforts could occur at intervals greater than fifteen years. An effective collecting strategy for insect pollinated herbaceous perennial species was to sample >150 plants, equalize maternal contribution, and sample along random transects with sufficient space between plants to minimize intrafamilial sampling. Quantifying genetic change between ex situ and in situ accessions allows genetic resource managers to validate ex situ collecting and maintenance protocols, develop appropriate recollection intervals, and provide an early detection mechanism for identifying problematic conditions that can be addressed to prevent further decline in vulnerable in situ populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25121602 PMCID: PMC4133347 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location of studied populations of Trifolium thompsonii in Washington State, USA.
Inset map shows Douglas and Chelan county, where Thompson clover is endemic. Four populations were studied: KEYSTONE (red), TENAS (green), RNA (blue) and BADGER (yellow, located east of the Columbia river, and south of RNA).
Size and habitat of study locations, population census estimate based on mean plant density, and number of plants analyzed using AFLP markers.
| Location | Area (km2) | Habitat | Population census | No. plants analyzed | |||
| <1998 | 2008 | 1995 | 2004 | 2009 | |||
| BADGER | 0.04 |
| 193,368 | 166,666 | 18 | 64 | 60 |
| RNA | 1.01 |
| 6,075828 | 1,630,785 | 19 | 63 | 56 |
| TENAS | 0.36 |
| 7,174,060 | 5,564,140 | 0 | 64 | 60 |
| KEYSTONE | 0.82 |
| 1,481,738 | 1,545,595 | 35 | 64 | 48 |
Habitat description based on classification of vegetation [27].
[27].
[30].
Washington Natural Heritage Program Report Trifolium thompsonii EO 2342-SF 1856.
Washington Natural Heritage Program Report Trifolium thompsonii EO 6503.
Washington Natural Heritage Program Report Trifolium thompsonii EO 3235.
Washington Natural Heritage Program Report Trifolium thompsonii EO 2342.
AFLP band patterns and % polymorphic loci for four populations and for the combined populations (POP), sampled for three time periods.
| BAND | BADGER | RNA | TENAS | KEYSTONE | POP |
|
| |||||
| NB | 110 | 109 | – | 109 | 121 |
| CB | 110 | 109 | – | 102 | 109 |
| RB | 0 | 0 | 7 | 12 | |
| NWS | 2 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
| PB | 1 | 0 | – | 0 | 1 |
| %P | 75.2 | 76.7 | – | 69.0 | 73.6 |
|
| |||||
| NB | 111 | 118 | 112 | 114 | 126 |
| CB | 105 | 109 | 99 | 100 | 109 |
| RB | 6 | 9 | 13 | 14 | 17 |
| NWS | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| PB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| %P | 79.8 | 77.5 | 72.9 | 69.0 | 74.8 |
|
| |||||
| NB | 109 | 118 | 113 | 109 | 127 |
| CB | 107 | 112 | 102 | 97 | 109 |
| RB | 2 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 18 |
| NWS | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| PB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| %P | 76.0 | 77.5 | 72.1 | 67.4 | 73.2 |
NB = total number of bands; CB = Common bands (number of different bands with a frequency >0.05); RB = Rare bands (number of different bands with a frequency <0.05); NWS = Not widely shared bands, (common bands found in 25% or fewer populations); PB = number of private bands; %P = percent polymorphic loci at the 5% level, expressed as a percentage.
Expected heterozygosity (He) under Hardy-Weinberg genotypic proportions for ex situ samples collected in 1995, recollected in 2004, and in situ populations sampled in 2009.
| Location | 1995 | 2004 | 2009 |
| BADGER | 0.292 aa | 0.276 ab | 0.275 ab |
| RNA | 0.278 aa | 0.271 aa | 0.274 aa |
| TENAS | – | 0.247 ba | 0.250 ba |
| KEYSTONE | 0.250 ba | 0.250 ba | 0.242 ba |
Differences in first letter correspond to significant differences in He among the four locations within the same year. Differences in second letter correspond to significant differences in He within location across the three years sampled (Bonferroni correction for testing seven hypotheses based on overall critical p-value of 5% is ≤0.007).
Geographic distance (km) between each location (above diagonal) and population pairwise PhiPT values (below diagonal) based on samples collected in 2004 and 2009 (Values significant at P<0.001).
| Population | BADGER | RNA | TENAS | KEYSTONE |
| BADGER | – | 10.07 | 9.09 | 13.21 |
| RNA | 0.068 | – | 2.47 | 8.21 |
| TENAS | 0.081 | 0.046 | – | 6.31 |
| KEYSTONE | 0.099 | 0.087 | 0.085 | – |
Nested analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on 129 polymorphic loci based on populations sampled at three locations (BADGER, RNA, and KEYSTONE), for three different years (1995, 2004, 2009).
| AMOVA | df | MS | Variation | % variation | Phi | P-value |
| Location | 2 | 225.538 | 1.229 | 7 | 0.069 | 0.01 |
| Year/location | 6 | 40.166 | 0.529 | 3 | 0.032 | 0.01 |
| Subpopulation | 431 | 16.085 | 16.085 | 90 | 0.099 | 0.01 |
| Total | 439 | 17.844 | 100 |
Figure 2Neighbor-joining tree showing genetic relationship among Thompson clover.
Relatedness of four populations of Thompson clover sampled in 1995, 2004, and 2009, based on Nei’s genetic distance estimated using AFLPs.
Figure 3Q-plots based on AFLP analyses.
Bayesian analysis using the software STRUCTURE suggested most likely groups of K = 2 and K = 4.
Assignment of 551 individuals from seven subpopulations (columns) to source populations (rows) to detect gene flow between four locations over 15 years.
| Allocated to | BAD95 | BAD04 | BAD09 | RNA95 | RNA04 | RNA09 | TENAS04 | TENAS09 | KEY95 | KEY04 | KEY09 | Total |
| BAD 1995 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| BAD 2004 | 0 | 40 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 |
| BAD 2009 | 0 | 8 | 33 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
| RNA 1995 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| RNA 2004 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 |
| RNA 2009 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| TEN 2004 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55 |
| TEN 2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 |
| KEY 1995 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 25 |
| KEY 2004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 3 | 29 |
| KEY 2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 35 | 50 |
| CNM | 5 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 25 | 22 | 155 |
| # IND | 18 | 64 | 60 | 19 | 63 | 56 | 63 | 48 | 35 | 64 | 60 | 551 |
Criteria not met (CNM) to meet minimal log-likelihood difference of 0.5 for the allocation of an individual to a population.
Estimated population sizes () of the four locations over the three sampling years.
| Years | BADGER | RNA | TENAS | KEYSTONE |
| Loci | 66 | 77 | 83 | 77 |
| 1995–2004 | 30 | 163 | – | 105 |
| 2004–2009 | 44 | 113 | 57 | 156 |