Literature DB >> 25121070

Expressly fabricated molar tube bases: enhanced adhesion.

Tarun Sharma1, Tarun Singh Phull2, Tarun Rana3, Varun Kumar4.   

Abstract

Clinicians, Orthodontists and their patients' parents often expect the best results in the shortest time span possible. Orthodontic bonding of molar tubes has been an acceptable risk in a modern era of refined biomaterials and instrumentation. Although many orthodontists still prefer banding to bonding, it is the failure rate of the tubes on molars which accounts to an impedance in molar bonding. One of the reasons for molar attachment failures is attributed to improper adaptation of the buccal tube base with or without increased thickness of composite. Merits of banding the second molars especially when these are the terminal teeth for anchorage have been overemphasized in the literature. The present article presents a simple and relatively less time consuming technique of preparing molar tubes to be bonded on tooth surfaces which may be quite difficult to isolate especially for bonding, for example, mandibular second molars. The increased surface area of the composite scaffold helps not only in enhanced bond strength but also serves to reduce the incidence of plaque accumulation given the dexterity of invitro preparation. The removal of the occlusal part of the molar tube scaffold helps in prevention of open / raised bite tendencies. The present innovation, therefore, is not merely serendipity but a structured technique to overcome a common dilemma for the clinical orthodontist. The present dictum of banding being superior to molar tube bonding may prove to be futile with trendsetting molar attachments. It is also an established fact that bonding proves to be a lesser expensive modality when compared to banding procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Banding; Bond strength; Failure rate; Orthodontic biomaterials; Scaffold

Year:  2014        PMID: 25121070      PMCID: PMC4129279          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9599.4496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  8 in total

1.  2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends.

Authors:  Robert G Keim; Eugene L Gottlieb; Allen H Nelson; David S Vogels
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2002-10

2.  Bond failure patterns in vivo.

Authors:  Rognvald A Linklater; Peter H Gordon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Bonded molar tubes: a survey of their use by specialist orthodontists.

Authors:  Paula G Murray; Declan T Millett; Michael Cronin
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2012-06

4.  Long-term clinical failure rate of molar tubes bonded with a self-etching primer.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Lars Christensen; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Areas requiring further research in testing of orthodontic shear bond strengths.

Authors:  Jose C de Castro
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2007-03

6.  Banding versus bonding of first permanent molars: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariyah Nazir; Tanya Walsh; Nicky A Mandall; Susie Matthew; Dee Fox
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2011-06

7.  The twenty-minute full strapup.

Authors:  E Silverman; M Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1976-10

8.  In-vivo prospective comparison of bond failure rates of 2 self-etching primer/adhesive systems.

Authors:  Anthony Pasquale; Martin Weinstein; Alan J Borislow; Leonard E Braitman
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.650

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.