Pushpendra Shukla1, Shyam Lal2, G P Shrivastava3, Lal Mani Singh1. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Shyam Shah Medical College , Rewa (M.P.),India . 2. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, ESI-PGIMSR Hospital , Basaidarapur, New Delhi,India . 3. Professor, Department of Surgery, Shyam Shah Medical College , Rewa (M.P.),India .
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to study the various treatment options according to the grading scale for penile incarceration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review, of all the case files of patients presented with penile incarceration with encircling metallic object was performed. The patients were analyzed for age, marital status, motive, object used, who applied it, trauma grade, duration of incarceration, removal technique, removal time, anesthesia used and recovery time. RESULT: A total of seven patients were identified. The average age was 46.71 years. Self-sexual gratification was the most common motive (five patients). Six patients presented within 24 hours. Grade II of injury was commonest type of injury seen in five patients.The technique of removal chosen was according to grade of penile injury, duration of incarceration and type of object used. Spinal anesthesia was used in most of the cases (five patients). CONCLUSION: Penile incarceration with encircling metallic objects is a rare presentation and requires urgent intervention according to trauma grade to prevent complications.
OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to study the various treatment options according to the grading scale for penile incarceration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review, of all the case files of patients presented with penile incarceration with encircling metallic object was performed. The patients were analyzed for age, marital status, motive, object used, who applied it, trauma grade, duration of incarceration, removal technique, removal time, anesthesia used and recovery time. RESULT: A total of seven patients were identified. The average age was 46.71 years. Self-sexual gratification was the most common motive (five patients). Six patients presented within 24 hours. Grade II of injury was commonest type of injury seen in five patients.The technique of removal chosen was according to grade of penile injury, duration of incarceration and type of object used. Spinal anesthesia was used in most of the cases (five patients). CONCLUSION: Penile incarceration with encircling metallic objects is a rare presentation and requires urgent intervention according to trauma grade to prevent complications.
Authors: H Pastor Navarro; M J Donáte Moreno; P Carrión López; P Segura Martín; J Lorenzo Romero; J M Pastor Guzmán; J Payá Berbegal; S Lujan Marco; J Virseda Rodríguez Journal: Arch Esp Urol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 0.436
Authors: Tuan Thanh Nguyen; Xuan Thai Ngo; Quy Thuan Chau; Khac Chuan Hoang; Le Quy Van Dinh; Hoai Tam Ly; Tien Dat Hoang; Ryan W Dobbs; Minh Sam Thai Journal: J Med Case Rep Date: 2022-04-19