Literature DB >> 25120700

Mutation analysis of key genes in RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways in Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Wenmin Hou1, Jibin Liu2, Peizhan Chen3, Hui Wang3, Bang-Ce Ye4, Fulin Qiang5.   

Abstract

The RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN signaling pathways play central roles in hepatocarcinogenesis. KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN are key cancer-related genes in the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN signaling pathways. Genetic alterations in these genes often lead to the dysregulation of the two cascades. Little is known regarding the frequency of hotspot mutations in these critical components among Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the current study, 57 somatic hotspot mutations in 36 HCCs samples collected from Chinese patients using direct DNA sequencing method were examined. Two cases of KRAS somatic mutations (KRAS codon 61; Gln to His) were identified among 36 HCCs (5.6%). However, no mutations were found in the NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN genes. These findings indicated that point mutations in the KRAS gene, but not mutations in NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN genes, at a somatic level contribute to the abnormal activation of the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways in HCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KRAS; cancer-related genes; hepatocellular carcinoma; mutation analysis

Year:  2014        PMID: 25120700      PMCID: PMC4114707          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2014.2253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, accounting for >740,000 new cases and 690,000 mortalities per year (1). Half of these new cases and mortalities were estimated to occur in China. The high rates of HCC in China are largely due to the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (2). The RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN signaling pathways play central roles in hepatocarcinogenesis (3). The aberrant activation of the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN signaling pathways is associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients (4,5). HBV also utilizes the pathways for the control of hepatocyte survival and viral replication (6,7). Mutations of key components (such as RAS, RAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN) in the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways lead to the dysregulation of the two cascades (8). The RAS family comprises three members: KRAS, NRAS and HRAS. Somatic mutations in the RAS family are common in numerous human cancer types, including pancreatic, thyroid, colorectal, liver, kidney and lung (9). BRAF is the most frequently mutated gene in the RAF family, and the BRAF mutation has been reported in 61% of melanoma, 53% of papillary thyroid cancer and 11.5% of colorectal cancer patients (10–12). The PI3K gene comprises PIK3CA, which encodes the catalytically active p110α subunit, and PIK3R1, encoding the p85α regulatory subunit (13). PIK3CA is mutated in numerous tumor types, with the frequency ranging from 4 to 32% in breast, colorectal, endometrial, brain, gastric and lung cancer (14–17). PIK3R1 mutations were identified in 43% of endometrial cancer, 4% of ovarian cancer and 2% of colon cancer (18–19). PTEN acts as a negative regulator of the PI3K pathway and PTEN mutations lead to a reduction of its phosphatase activity (20). Mutations of the PTEN gene are associated with a wide variety of human tumors (21). Inhibitors targeting the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways have been developed and the clinical responses of patients were observed to differ according to the genetic alterations of the critical components of the two cascades (22). However, few data are available regarding the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN mutations in Chinese patients with HCC. In the present study, we conducted mutational analysis of 57 somatic hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN in 36 Chinese patients with HCC.

Materials and methods

Patients and tissue samples

Thirty-six patients with HCC undergoing surgery at Nantong Tumor Hospital (Nantong, China) between 2009 and 2011 were enrolled in this study. Tumor samples and adjacent normal liver tissues from the corresponding patients were fixed with 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Tumor staging was performed according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification (23). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nantong Tumor Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to sample collection.

Genomic DNA extraction

Tumor areas and non-tumorous tissue areas were identified on H&E-stained slides. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of HCC with the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, samples were placed into Eppendorf tubes and the paraffin was removed. Next, the tubes were incubated with proteinase K (Qiagen GmbH) at 56°C for 1 h. Following proteinase K digestion, the samples were incubated at 90°C for 1 h and DNA was extracted using QIAamp MinElute columns (Qiagen GmbH).

Mutation analysis

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to amplify the gene fragments including the hotspot mutations shown in Table I. The selection of the hotspots was based on the prevalence of mutations in cancers identified in the COSMIC database (24). A 50 μl volume of PCR was prepared using the Taq PCR Master Mix kit (Qiagen GmbH), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The thermocycling was performed at 94°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 60 sec; followed by a final 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were run on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ultraviolet light to confirm sizes. DNA purification was performed with the QIAprep Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen GmbH) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the DNA fragments were excised from the agarose gel with a scalpel and placed in a colorless tube. DNA cleanup was conducted using QIAquick spin columns (Qiagen GmbH). Direct DNA sequencing was performed using a Big Dye Terminator (v3.1) kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequencing products were run on an Applied Biosystems 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequencing results were analyzed using Chromas software (Technelysium, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia). The primers used for the PCR are listed in Table I.
Table I

Primers used for polymerase chain reaction in this study.

GeneMutationForward primer sequence (5′ to 3′)Reverse primer sequence (5′ to 3′)
KRASG12C, G12D, G13S, G13D, L19F, Q22KCTTAAGCGTCGATGGAGGAGCCCTGACATACTCCCAAGGA
A59T, Q61E, Q61R, Q61HGGTGCTTAGTGGCCATTTGTCCTAGGTTTCAATCCCAGCA
A146TTTGTGGACAGGTTTTGAAAGAAGAAACCAAAGCCAAAAGCA
NRASG12S, G12V, G13R, G13V, A18TGCCCAAGGACTGTTGAAAAACCGACAAGTGAGAGACAGGA
Q61K, Q61R, Q61HGGCAGAAATGGGCTTGAATAAGGTTAATATCCGCAAATGAC
HRASG12S, G12V, G13R, G13DGTGGGTTTGCCCTTCAGATTGGTGGATGTCCTCAAAAGA
Q61K, Q61R, Q61HTGGCTGTGTGAACTCCCCGTCAGTGAGTGCTGCTCCC
BRAFG464V, G466V, G469A, V471FCACTTGGTAGACGGGACTCGAGTTTATTGATGCGAACAGTGA
D594G, L597V, V600EAACTCTTCATAATGCTTGCTCTGAAGCCTCAATTCTTACCATCCA
PIK3CAR38G, Q75E, R108HGCCTAATCAAGTCAAACTATGGAAAAGCTTTATGGTTATTTGCATTTT
G118DATGTTTGCTGCCTTTGCTCTATAAGCAGTCCCTGCCTTCA
C378RTAAGGGGATTGTGGGCCTATAATGGGGTCTTGCTTTGTTG
C420RCTCATGCTTGCTTTGGTTCATTGGCATGCTCTTCAATCAC
P539R, E542K, E545K, E545G, Q546KGATTGGTTCTTTCCTGTCTCTGCCACAAATATCAATTTACAACCATTG
T1025A, M1043T, M1043I, H1047Y, H1047R, H1047LCATTTGCTCCAAACTGACCACACCCCAAGCATTTTTCTTC
PIK3R1G376RCAGACGGGACCTTTTTGGTAAACAAAATAGCTGACATGGAAACA
K459E, D464HGGCTTCTCTGACCCATTAACCCCCCACCTCATTCGTAAAAA
L570PGGAAGAGAAGCCACGCTTTACCCAACCACTCGTTCAACTT
PTENR130G, R130QCCGTATAGCGTAAATTCCCAGATCTCAGATCCAGGAAGAGGAA
R233XTGCTTGAGATCAAGATTGCAGGCCATAAGGCCTTTTCCTTC

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

Of 36 patients with HCC, the median age was 54 years (range, 40–77 years), including 33 males and three females. The majority of the cases had HCC associated with HBV infection (34/36; 94.4%). All patients were negative in hepatitis C virus infection. The concentrations of serum AFP of 16 patients (16/36; 44.4%) were higher than 400 ng/ml. The BCLC staging classification was used to classify the cancer staging (23). There were 2, 25, 8, 1 and 0 cases of stages 0 to D, respectively (Table II).
Table II

Clinical characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

CharacteristicValue
Age, years
 Median (range)54 (40–77)
Gender, n (%)
 Male33 (91.7)
 Female3 (8.3)
Etiology, n (%)
 HBV(+)34 (94.4)
 HBV(−)2 (5.6)
AFP, n (%)
 >400 ng/ml16 (44.4)
 ≤400 ng/ml20 (55.6)
Stage, n (%)
 02 (5.6)
 A25 (69.4)
 B8 (22.2)
 C1 (2.8)
 D0 (0.0)

Mutation analysis of key genes in the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways

We analyzed hotspot-containing gene fragments of key genes in RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways using PCR amplification followed by direct sequencing. The hotspots were listed in Table I. In all, two samples (Sample #13 and #35) had point mutations in codon 61 (Q61H) of the KRAS gene and the mutation rate was 5.6% (Fig. 1). In the two cases, codon 61 was altered from CAA, coding for Gln, to CAC, coding for His. To confirm the two mutations occurred at the somatic level, we tested codon 61 mutation status in non-tumorous tissues from the two patients. The results showed that codon 61 was wild-type in normal tissues from Sample #13 and #35 (Fig. 1). The two patients harboring KRAS mutation were male. Patient no. 13 was 49 years old, had HBV infection and stage A HCC, and an AFP level of 3.4 ng/ml. Patient no. 35 was 69 years old, had stage B HCC and was negative for HBV infection, with an AFP level of 1.95 ng/ml. No other mutations in the HRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN genes were identified.
Figure 1

Sequence analysis of KRAS gene mutation in codon 61 in two hepatocellular carcinoma cases. Sequence chromatograms of codon 61 in tumor and normal tissues from (A) Sample #13 and (B) Sample #35.

Discussion

Targeting the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways are novel therapeutic strategies that may be exploited for the treatment of HCC (8). As the RAF-kinase inhibitor sorafenib has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of HCC, BRAF mutations have become a favored target in HCC treatment recently (25). However, the somatic mutation prevalence and distribution of the key genes in the two pathways remain largely unknown in Chinese patients with HCC. Therefore, the present study set out to examine the frequency of hotspot mutations of the KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN genes in 36 human HCC tissues from Chinese patients. Only KRAS somatic mutations were identified, with a mutation rate of 5.6%. The incidence of KRAS mutations has been found in 80% of advanced pancreatic cancer (26), 45% of cholangiocarcinoma (27) and 32% of colorectal cancer (28) patients. COSMIC database has shown that mutations in codons 12, 13 and 61 of the KRAS gene are known hotspots in various types of cancer. The frequency and distribution of KRAS mutation in HCC from several previous studies are summarized in Table III. The majority of these studies have shown that KRAS gene mutations occur infrequently (<10%) in HCC. The codon 12 accounts for the majority of KRAS mutations detected (~70%), whereas mutations affecting codon 13 and codon 61 account for the remaining 30%. One third of the twelve studies did not evaluate the KRAS codon 61 mutation status, which may cause bias in the distribution of the KRAS mutation. Three whole exome sequencing studies conducted mutational screening in all KRAS exons and found that the mutations were clustered in the hotspots (29–31). In the current study, mutations were detected in codons 12, 13 and 61 of the KRAS gene, and two out of 36 (5.6%) HCCs harbored KRAS mutations in codon 61. Therefore, KRAS gene mutations may participate in hepatocellular carcinogenesis.
Table III

Reported point mutations in codons 12, 13, and 61 of KRAS in hepatocellular carcinomas.

Author (ref)PopulationNo. of patientsCodon 12Codon 13Codon 61Frequency (%)
Zuo et al (36)Chinese6421NA4.7
Huang et al (31)Chinese100000.0
Taketomi et al (33)Japanese610101.6
Tsuda et al (43)Japanese301003.3
Taniguchi et al (44)Japanese1500NA0.0
Fujimoto et al (29)Japanese270000.0
Tada et al (45)Japanese120000.0
Bose et al (46)Indian302006.7
Tannapfel et al (27)German2500NA0.0
Weihrauch et al (47)German2030NA15.0
Challen et al (32)British190NA15.3
Guichard et al (30)French1491011.3
Colombino et al (37)Italian651001.5

NA, not available.

The present study also investigated the hotspot mutations in NRAS and HRAS, but found no mutation in the two genes. Few studies have focused on the mutation incidence of these two RAS family members in Chinese patients with HCC. A whole exome sequencing study identified no mutation in these two genes in a Chinese population (31). Challen et al found that the frequency of NRAS mutations was 15.8%, but did not identify HRAS mutations, in British patients with HCC (32). Taketomi et al reported neither NRAS nor HRAS mutations were detected in Japanese HCC cases (33). Thus, the mutational activation of NRAS and HRAS genes is an uncommon event in the pathogenesis of HCCs. BRAF mutations can abnormally activate downstream signaling pathways in HCC and act as indicator of cetuximab resistance in patients with colon cancer (34,35). BRAF mutations are believed to be rare in HCCs. Previously, no BRAF mutations were identified in German and Chinese populations (27,36). However, Colombino et al detected that the BRAF gene was highly mutated in ~23% of Italian HCC cases (37). In the current series, no BRAF mutations were observed, indicating that BRAF mutation does not play a major role in abnormal activation of RAS/RAF signaling pathway. PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN are key genes in the PI3K/PTEN pathway (8). In the current study, it was found that mutations were absent in the three genes. Previously, PIK3CA was observed to be frequently mutated in Korean and Italian patients with HCC, with mutation rates of 35.6 and 28%, respectively (15,37). However, Tanaka et al did not identify PIK3CA mutations in Japanese patients with HCC, and Riener et al reported that the PIK3CA mutation incidence was 2% in Swiss patients with HCC (38,39). In two studies in Chinese patients with HCC, the mutation rates were 1.6 and 1.1% (36,40), which were similar to those of the present study. The conflicting data may be due to the different genetic backgrounds of the populations, HBV infection status and smaller sample size in the current study. PIK3R1 mutation has been found to occur infrequently in numerous cancer types, including ovarian and colon cancer (19), and the present study showed a low frequency of alteration of PIK3R1 in HCC. Inactivation of PTEN in HCC may be largely due to frequent loss of heterozygosity of the PTEN allele; the frequency was identified to be ≤44.4% (41). Wang et al investigated PTEN mutations in exons 5 and 8, but failed to detect any (42), which was in agreement with the results of the present study. Mutations in the PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN genes rarely occur in HCC, suggesting that somatic point mutations of these three genes may not play an important role in HCC in the Chinese population. However, further research is necessary to confirm these results in larger sample size. In summary, the present study investigated the prevalence of KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN mutations in 57 hotspot mutations. Two cases of KRAS mutation were identified among 36 HCC cases. The findings indicated that point mutations in the KRAS gene, but not mutations in the NRAS, HRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, PIK3R1 and PTEN genes, at the somatic level contribute to the abnormal activation of the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways in HCC. Considering the low frequency of key genes in the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN signaling pathways, other mechanisms to activate the RAS/RAF and PI3K/PTEN pathways, such as gene amplification, deletion, and aberrant methylation, may be involved in the development and progression of HCC.
  47 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of several molecular markers and clinicopathological features in postoperative prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Qiang Zuo; Hui Huang; Min Shi; Futing Zhang; Jiping Sun; Jianping Bin; Yulin Liao; Wangjun Liao
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA exon 20, and BRAF genotypes in synchronous and metachronous primary colorectal cancers diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Katharina Balschun; Jochen Haag; Ann-Kathrin Wenke; Witigo von Schönfels; Nicolas T Schwarz; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  PIK3CA gene is frequently mutated in breast carcinomas and hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee; Young Hwa Soung; Su Young Kim; Hae Woo Lee; Won Sang Park; Suk Woo Nam; Sang Ho Kim; Jung Young Lee; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification.

Authors:  J M Llovet; C Brú; J Bruix
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.115

5.  Mutation analysis of the BRAF, ARAF and RAF-1 genes in human colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Karin Fransén; Maria Klintenäs; Anna Osterström; Jan Dimberg; Hans-Jürg Monstein; Peter Söderkvist
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  BRAF mutations in papillary carcinomas of the thyroid.

Authors:  Toshihiko Fukushima; Shinichi Suzuki; Miyuki Mashiko; Tohru Ohtake; Yoshiyuki Endo; Yuji Takebayashi; Koji Sekikawa; Koichi Hagiwara; Seiichi Takenoshita
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Negative regulation of PKB/Akt-dependent cell survival by the tumor suppressor PTEN.

Authors:  V Stambolic; A Suzuki; J L de la Pompa; G M Brothers; C Mirtsos; T Sasaki; J Ruland; J M Penninger; D P Siderovski; T W Mak
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Targeting survival cascades induced by activation of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR and Jak/STAT pathways for effective leukemia therapy.

Authors:  J A McCubrey; L S Steelman; S L Abrams; F E Bertrand; D E Ludwig; J Bäsecke; M Libra; F Stivala; M Milella; A Tafuri; P Lunghi; A Bonati; A M Martelli
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  PIK3CA is implicated as an oncogene in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  L Shayesteh; Y Lu; W L Kuo; R Baldocchi; T Godfrey; C Collins; D Pinkel; B Powell; G B Mills; J W Gray
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  BRAF and PIK3CA genes are somatically mutated in hepatocellular carcinoma among patients from South Italy.

Authors:  M Colombino; P Sperlongano; F Izzo; F Tatangelo; G Botti; A Lombardi; M Accardo; L Tarantino; I Sordelli; M Agresti; A Abbruzzese; M Caraglia; G Palmieri
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 8.469

View more
  12 in total

1.  PIK3CA rs7640662 (C/G) single nucleotide polymorphism lacks association with breast cancer cases in Persians.

Authors:  Atefeh Mir; Mahdiyeh Harati Sadegh; Zahra Ahmadinia; Parham Jabbarzadeh Kaboli
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2015-03-20

Review 2.  Pathway perturbations in signaling networks: Linking genotype to phenotype.

Authors:  Yongsheng Li; Daniel J McGrail; Natasha Latysheva; Song Yi; M Madan Babu; Nidhi Sahni
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Reduced PTEN expression and overexpression of miR-17-5p, -19a-3p, -19b-3p, -21-5p, -130b-3p, -221-3p and -222-3p by glioblastoma stem-like cells following irradiation.

Authors:  Takatoshi Tokudome; Akiko Sasaki; Mayumi Tsuji; Yuko Udaka; Hideto Oyamada; Hiromichi Tsuchiya; Katsuji Oguchi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma by correction of metabolic abnormalities: Role of statins and metformin.

Authors:  Javier Ampuero; Manuel Romero-Gomez
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-18

Review 5.  Somatic Mutations in Prostate Cancer: Closer to Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  M J Alvarez-Cubero; L J Martinez-Gonzalez; I Robles-Fernandez; J Martinez-Herrera; G Garcia-Rodriguez; M Pascual-Geler; J M Cozar; J A Lorente
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 6.  Genetic alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma: An update.

Authors:  Zhao-Shan Niu; Xiao-Jun Niu; Wen-Hong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Combined effects of PLK1 and RAS in hepatocellular carcinoma reveal rigosertib as promising novel therapeutic "dual-hit" option.

Authors:  Peter Dietrich; Kim Freese; Abdo Mahli; Wolfgang Erwin Thasler; Claus Hellerbrand; Anja Katrin Bosserhoff
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-11

8.  Molecular modeling, dynamics simulations, and binding efficiency of berberine derivatives: A new group of RAF inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Parham Jabbarzadeh Kaboli; Patimah Ismail; King-Hwa Ling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Targeted Gene Silencing BRAF Synergized Photothermal Effect Inhibits Hepatoma Cell Growth Using New GAL-GNR-siBRAF Nanosystem.

Authors:  Yanling Liu; Manman Tan; Yujuan Zhang; Wei Huang; Liangliang Min; Shanshan Peng; Keng Yuan; Li Qiu; Weiping Min
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 4.703

10.  Efficacy of sorafenib in BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no response in synchronous BRAF wild type-hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.

Authors:  Andrea Casadei Gardini; Elisa Chiadini; Luca Faloppi; Giorgia Marisi; Angelo Delmonte; Mario Scartozzi; Cristian Loretelli; Alessandro Lucchesi; Devil Oboldi; Alessandra Dubini; Giovanni Luca Frassineti; Paola Ulivi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.