| Literature DB >> 25120420 |
Atsuko Saito1, Hiroki Hamada2, Takefumi Kikusui3, Kazutaka Mogi3, Miho Nagasawa3, Shohei Mitsui3, Takashi Higuchi4, Toshikazu Hasegawa1, Kazuo Hiraki5.
Abstract
The neuropeptide oxytocin plays a central role in prosocial and parental behavior in non-human mammals as well as humans. It has been suggested that oxytocin may affect visual processing of infant faces and emotional reaction to infants. Healthy male volunteers (N = 13) were tested for their ability to detect infant or adult faces among adult or infant faces (facial visual search task). Urine samples were collected from all participants before the study to measure the concentration of oxytocin. Urinary oxytocin positively correlated with performance in the facial visual search task. However, task performance and its correlation with oxytocin concentration did not differ between infant faces and adult faces. Our data suggests that endogenous oxytocin is related to facial visual cognition, but does not promote infant-specific responses in unmarried men who are not fathers.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive task; infant; oxytocin; social cognition; visual search
Year: 2014 PMID: 25120420 PMCID: PMC4114186 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1Experimental sequence of the visual search task.
Average RTs (ms) and standard deviations for target-present and target-absent trials and differences between the reaction time for infant faces and that for adult faces.
| Adult target | 855.259 | 155.215 | 873.335 | 117.583 | 972.834 | 123.608 |
| Infant target | 843.201 | 135.803 | 875.097 | 137.499 | 963.807 | 90.290 |
| Difference | –12.059 | 50.304 | 1.762 | 70.636 | –9.027 | 65.710 |
| Adult all | 856.670 | 149.689 | 860.864 | 120.309 | 1046.755 | 138.065 |
| Infant all | 742.284 | 102.438 | 752.219 | 101.178 | 937.447 | 105.662 |
| Difference | –114.386 | 68.782 | –108.645 | 64.621 | –109.308 | 86.976 |
Figure 2Correlation between urinary oxytocin levels and reaction times (A–L). (A) Target present, adult target condition, set size 3; (B) Target present, adult target condition, set size 4; (C) Target present, adult target condition, set size 6; (D) Target present, infant target condition, set size 3; (E) Target present, infant target condition, set size 4; (F) Target present, infant target condition, set size 6; (G) Target absent, adult all condition, set size 3; (H) Target absent, adult all condition, set size 4; (I) Target absent, adult all condition, set size 6; (J) Target absent, infant all condition, set size 3; (K) Target absent, infant all condition, set size 4; (L) Target absent, infant all condition, set size 6. *indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 3Correlation between urinary oxytocin levels and differences between the reaction times for infant faces and adult faces (A–F). (A) Target present, set size 3; (B) Target present, set size 4; (C) Target present, set size 6; (D) Target absent, set size 3; (E) Target present, set size 4; (F) Target present, set size 6.