| Literature DB >> 25120286 |
Giovanni Ruvolo1, Calogera Pisano1, Giuseppina Candore2, Domenico Lio2, Cesira Palmeri2, Emiliano Maresi3, Carmela R Balistreri2.
Abstract
Thoracic aorta shows with advancing age various changes and a progressive deterioration in structure and function. As a result, vascular remodeling (VR) and medial degeneration (MD) occur as pathological entities responsible principally for the sporadic TAA onset. Little is known about their genetic, molecular, and cellular mechanisms. Recent evidence is proposing the strong role of a chronic immune/inflammatory process in their evocation and progression. Thus, we evaluated the potential role of Toll like receptor- (TLR-) 4-mediated signaling pathway and its polymorphisms in sporadic TAA. Genetic, immunohistochemical, and biochemical analyses were assessed. Interestingly, the rs4986790 TLR4 polymorphism confers a higher susceptibility for sporadic TAA (OR = 14.4, P = 0.0008) and it represents, together with rs1799752 ACE, rs3918242 MMP-9, and rs2285053 MMP-2 SNPs, an independent sporadic TAA risk factor. In consistency with these data, a significant association was observed between their combined risk genotype and sporadic TAA. Cases bearing this risk genotype showed higher systemic inflammatory mediator levels, significant inflammatory/immune infiltrate, a typical MD phenotype, lower telomere length, and positive correlations with histopatological abnormalities, hypertension, smoking, and ageing. Thus, TLR4 pathway should seem to have a key role in sporadic TAA. It might represent a potential useful tool for preventing and monitoring sporadic TAA and developing personalized treatments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25120286 PMCID: PMC4120489 DOI: 10.1155/2014/349476
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidity conditions, and pharmacological treatment of 161 patients affected by sporadic TAA, 128 control subjects, and 30 aorta controls.
| Variables | Patients | Male | Female | Controls |
|
| Aorta Controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic characteristics | |||||||
| Age, mean (SD) | 63 (10.7) | 63 (11) | 64 (9) | 61.1 (5.8) | 0.834 | 0.594 | 63.9 (10.3) |
| Male sex, number (%) | 127 (78) | 61 (47) | |||||
| Female sex, number (%) | 34 (22) | 67 (53) | |||||
| Body mass index, mean (SD) | 27 (4.3) | 26.9 (3.8) | 27.5 (5.6) | 26.9 (2.9) | 0.898 | 0.963 | 25.6 (2.9) |
| Size and location | |||||||
| Size (mm), mean (SD) | 53.3 (8) | 52.9 (7.5) | 55 (9.8) | 0 (0) | 0.191 | 0 (0) | |
| Location, number (%): | 0 (0) | 0.198 | |||||
| Ascending aorta | 81 (50) | 20 (59) | 61 (48) | ||||
| Aortic Bulb | 18 (11) | 1 (3) | 17 (13.4) | ||||
| Ascending aorta and Aortic bulb | 62 (39) | 13 (38) | 49 (38.6) | ||||
| Comorbidity conditions, number (%) | |||||||
| Cardiovascular Ischemic Familiarity | 59 (36.6) | 48 (38) | 11 (32) | 34 (27) | 0.089 | 0.7 | 1 (3.3) |
| Smoking | 73 (45) | 67 (53) | 6 (18) | 66 (51) | 0.351 |
| 3 (10) |
| Hypertension | 127 (78.9) | 101 (80) | 26 (76) | 40 (31) |
| 0.879 | 2 (6.6) |
| Dislipidemy | 37 (23) | 30 (24) | 7 (21) | 20 (16) | 0.158 | 0.886 | 0 (0) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 24 (15) | 16 (13) | 8 (24) | 16 (13) | 0.677 | 0.187 | 0 (0) |
| Renal failure | 5 (3.1) | 4 (3.1) | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | 0.168 | 0.621 | 0 (0) |
| Dissection | 18 (11) | 5 (15) | 13 (10) | 0 (0) | 0.669 | 0 (0) | |
| Aortic valve pathology, number (%): | 0 (0) | ||||||
| Normal | 90 (56) | 71 (56) | 20 (59) | 0 (0) | 0.766 | 0 (0) | |
| Prolapse | 21 (13) | 17 (13) | 3 (9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Vascular calcium fibrosis | 50 (31) | 39 (31) | 11 (32) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Aortic valve dysfunction, number (%): | |||||||
| Normal | 32 (20) | 26 (20.4) | 6 (17.6) | 0 (0) | 0.91 | 0 (0) | |
| Faint incontinence | 29 (18) | 22 (17) | 7 (20.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Moderate incontinence | 34 (21) | 28 (22) | 6 (17.6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Severe incontinence | 44 (28) | 35 (28) | 9 (26.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Faint stenosis | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Moderate stenosis | 2 (1.2) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Severe stenosis | 19 (11.2) | 14 (11) | 5 (15) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Atherosclerosis coronary syndrome No (%) | 54 (33.8) | 45 (36) | 9 (26.5) | 0 (0) | 0.42 | 0 (0) | |
| Drugs, number (%) | |||||||
| Beta blockers | 62 (39) | 47 (37) | 15 (44) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Central alpha-adrenergic agonists | 26 (16) | 21 (17) | 5 (15) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Sartans | 32 (20) | 27 (21) | 5 (15) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Calcium-channel blockers | 47 (29) | 38 (30) | 9 (26) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| ACE inhibitors | 66 (41) | 55 (43) | 11 (32) | 21 (16) | 0 (0) | ||
| Antidiabetic drugs | 19 (12) | 13 (10) | 6 (18) | 16 (13) | 0 (0) | ||
| Antiaggregant drugs | 51 (32) | 44 (34) | 7 (21) | 40 (31) | 0 (0) | ||
| Antidislipidemic drugs | 36 (22) | 30 (24) | 6 (18) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Diuretics | 36 (22) | 24 (19) | 12 (36) | 40 (31) | 0 (0) |
Figure 1Survival in female and male patients after surgery.
Figure 2Morphometric quantification of lymphocytes, T cell subpopulations, and macrophages in tissue samples of the control aortas and patients and normal aorta case areas. CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD68 positive cells in media and adventitia and in 10 contiguous high-power fields (magnification 400x) were counted by two independent observers. Significant increased amounts of CD3+CD4+CD8+CD68+CD20+ cells were observed by comparing their values among the three groups (by ANOVA test). In particular, cases showed significant higher numbers of these cells than controls and normal aorta case areas.
Allele frequencies of rs4986790 (+896A/G) TLR4, rs333 (Δ32) CCR5 deletion, rs2070744 (−786T/C) eNOs, rs1799752 (D/I) ACE, rs3918242 (−1562C/T) MMP-9, and rs2285053 (−735C/T) MMP-2 SNPs in 161 S-TAA patients and 128 matched controls (2 × 2 comparisons between the different groups with odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval).
| Candidate genes | Reference SNP number | Alleles |
Patients |
Matched controls |
| OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLR4 | rs4986790 | +896A | 321 | 99.7% | 245 | 96% | 0.0008 | 14.4 (18.1–112.4) |
| +896G | 1 | 0.3% | 11 | 4% | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| CCR5 | rs333 | WT | 317 | 98% | 238 | 93% | 0.001 | 4.7 (1.7–13.1) |
|
| ||||||||
| eNOS | rs2070744 | Δ32 | 5 | 2% | 18 | 7% | 0.00007 | 2.2 (1.5–3.2) |
| −786T | 207 | 64% | 204 | 80% | ||||
| −786C | 115 | 36% | 52 | 20% | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| ACE | rs1799752 | I | 125 | 39% | 141 | 55% | 0.0001 | 1.9 (1.3–2.6) |
| D | 197 | 61% | 115 | 45% | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| MMP-9 | rs3918242 | −1562C | 282 | 88% | 241 | 94% | 0.011 | 2.27 (1.2–4.22) |
| −1562T | 40 | 12% | 15 | 6% | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| MMP-2 | rs2285053 | −735C | 287 | 89% | 251 | 98% | 0.00005 | 6.1 (2.3–15.8) |
| −735T | 35 | 11% | 5 | 2% | ||||
All genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Frequency of +896ATLR4/DACE/−1562TMMP-9/−735TMMP-2 “high responder” (proinflammatory) genotype between patients and controls (2 × 2 comparisons between the different groups with odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval).
| Subjects | +896ATLR4/DACE/−1562TMMP-9/−735TMMP-2 “high responder” | Other genotypes |
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients ( | 46 | 115 |
|
|
| Controls ( |
|
|
Systemic plasma mediator's levels “AASSP” from patients and controls.
| Systemic mediators examined | Patients | Controls |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 13.69 ± 2.1 | 5.1 ± 1.9 | <0.0001 |
| TNF- | 16.34 ± 1.2 | 8.1 ± 2.4 | <0.0001 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 16.86 ± 2.2 | 5.6 ± 1.3 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-2 (ng/mL) | 57.5 ± 2.8 | 13.54 ± 1.24 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-9 (ng/mL) | 59.8 ± 2.5 | 12.7 ± 1.6 | <0.0001 |
|
| |||
| Systemic mediators examined | Patients with high responder genotype | Patients with other genotypes |
|
|
| |||
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 17.66 ± 2.1 | 9.1 ± 0.9 | <0.001 |
| TNF- | 16.78 ± 1.2 | 10.1 ± 2.2 | <0.01 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 20.13 ± 1.7 | 12.1 ± 0.5 | 0.01 |
| MMP-2 (ng/mL) | 61.8 ± 3.8 | 26.54 ± 1.6 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-9 (ng/mL) | 59.7 ± 3.7 | 21.7 ± 2.6 | <0.0001 |
|
| |||
| Systemic mediators examined | Patients with high responder genotype | Controls with high responder genotype |
|
|
| |||
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 17.66 ± 2.1 | 8.66 ± 2.1 | <0.0001 |
| TNF- | 16.78 ± 1.2 | 10.78 ± 1.2 | <0.01 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 20.13 ± 1.7 | 6.13 ± 1.7 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-2 (ng/mL) | 61.8 ± 3.8 | 18.8 ± 3.9 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-9 (ng/mL) | 59.7 ± 3.7 | 12.7 ± 2.7 | <0.0001 |
*By unpaired t-test with Welch correction.
Comparison of systemic inflammatory mediator's levels “AASSP” from controls bearing combined risk genotype versus controls with other genotypes and between controls bearing +896A TLR4 allele versus controls with +896G TLR4 allele.
| Systemic mediators examined | Controls with combined risk genotype | Controls with other genotypes |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 8.66 ± 2.1 | 1.1 ± 0.69 | <0.0001 |
| TNF- | 10.78 ± 1.2 | 2.1 ± 1.2 | <0.0001 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 6.13 ± 1.7 | 0.9 ± 1.5 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-2 (ng/mL) | 18.8 ± 3.9 | 2.54 ± 1.3 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-9 (ng/mL) | 12.7 ± 2.7 | 1.7 ± 1.6 | <0.0001 |
|
| |||
| Systemic mediators examined | Controls with +896ATLR4 allele | Controls with +896G TLR4 allele |
|
|
| |||
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | 5.1 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 |
| TNF- | 7.1 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 1.2 | <0.001 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 4.3 ± 1.1 | 0.3 ± 1.9 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-2 (ng/mL) | 10.6 ± 1.8 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | <0.0001 |
| MMP-9 (ng/mL) | 8.3 ± 0.7 | 0.98 ± 1.5 | <0.0001 |
*By unpaired t-test with Welch correction.
Figure 3Morphometric quantification of lymphocytes, T cell subpopulations, and macrophages in aorta samples of cases with high responder genotype, other genotypes, and controls. CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD68 positive cells in media and adventitia and in 10 contiguous high-power fields (magnification 400x) were counted by two independent observers. Significant increased amounts of CD3+CD4+CD8+CD68+CD20+ cells were observed by comparing their values among the three groups (by ANOVA test). In particular, cases with high responder genotype had higher numbers of these cells than controls and cases with other genotypes.
Correlations between the number of CD3+CD4+CD8+ CD68+CD20+ cells observed in aorta samples from patients bearing combined risk genotype and the histological abnormalities observed through histopathological and immunohistochemical assays and Tunel testing and levels of IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, and MMP-2 and -9.
| Variables | Correlations |
|
|---|---|---|
| Medionecrosis of grade III | 0.278 | 0.02 |
| Cystic-medial change of grade III | 0.346 | 0.001 |
| Elastic fragmentation of grade III | 0.467 | 0.0001 |
| Plurifocal Medial apoptosis | 0.333 | 0.001 |
| Elevated MMP-9 amounts | 0.379 | 0.001 |
| IL-6 | 0.379 | 0.003 |
| TNF- | 0.445 | 0.001 |
| CRP | 0.467 | 0.002 |
| MMP-2 | 0.578 | 0.001 |
| MMP-9 | 0.502 | 0.001 |
*By nonparametrical Spearman correlation test.
Figure 4Our model about the pathophysiology of sporadic TAA, the model of the pathway from the double-face. The major risk factors, hypertension, age, and smoking, induce an increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [17–19] and an upregulation of local renin-angiotensin system [16] and the tissue injury, initially involving ECs and subsequently VSMCs. This determines the release of some damage-related products and proteins (i.e., heart shock proteins (HSPs), high-mobility group box-1, low molecular hyaluronic acid, fibronectin fragments, and others), called danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [20]. DAMPs alert innate/inflammatory immune system interacting with TLR4 mediated signaling pathway, able to recognize both pathogens and endogenous ligands [21, 22]. Originally described as part of the first-line defense against Gram-negative bacteria, the best known member of TLRs, the TLR4, expressed on leukocytes and a large array of tissue and cell types, such as all aortic wall cells (particularly ECs and VSMCs), responds to these signals [23]. As a consequence, TLR4 activates and triggers an inflammatory response [24–28]. In turn, this determines a typical phenotypic switching of EC and VSMC cells due to activation of stress and stretch pathways accompanied by their dysfunction and senescence [27, 28]. In particular, it implies a differential change in their gene expression profile due prevalently of activation of Nuclear Factor-κB (NF-κB) transcription factor and followed by production and release of the so-called arterial-associated senescence secretor phenotype (AASSP) characterized by numerous inflammatory mediators, mitotic and trophic factors, proteoglycans and metalloproteinases (MMP)s, such as MMP-2 and -9, and vasoactive molecules [17, 24–29]. In addition, this also induces the reduction of nitric oxide (NO) [28]. This complex scenario results in modifications of vascular tone and permeability and degradation of components of extracellular matrix (ECM) and elastic fragmentation. VR and MD are, hence, evocated, which can evolve in aneurysm, dissection and rupture of aorta wall [17].