PURPOSE: Concurrent administration of Cetuximab with radiotherapy (Cetuximab-radiation) has been accepted as an alternative option for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare complications of Cetuximab-radiation with those of concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) with a special concern on gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage associated with Cetuximab-radiation. METHODS: Indication of Cetuximab-radiation/cCRT for locally advanced HNSCC was primary, postoperative adjuvant, or salvage after recurrence. Our first choice for patients with advanced HNSCC was cCRT; however, if patients did not have enough organ function but with a favorable performance status, Cetuximab-radiation was applied. RESULTS: From April 2013 to March 2014, 30 patients were identified who were treated with Cetuximab-radiation or cCRT and each cohort consisted of 15 patients. Patients in Cetuximab-radiation cohort suffered from a statistically higher rate of G3/4 dermatitis compared with cCRT cohort (80 vs. 13.3%, respectively, p < 0.001). More patients required unexpected hospitalization due to deterioration of their general condition and total parenteral nutrition in Cetuximab-radiation cohort (p = 0.011 and p = 0.025, respectively). While none experienced GI bleeding in cCRT cohort, four patients experienced GI bleeding including two grade 4 bleeding in Cetuximab-radiation cohort (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is probable that there exists a group of patients who are susceptible for Cetuximab-radiation not only in terms of well-known dermatitis and mucositis but also of gastrointestinal complications.
PURPOSE: Concurrent administration of Cetuximab with radiotherapy (Cetuximab-radiation) has been accepted as an alternative option for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare complications of Cetuximab-radiation with those of concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) with a special concern on gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage associated with Cetuximab-radiation. METHODS: Indication of Cetuximab-radiation/cCRT for locally advanced HNSCC was primary, postoperative adjuvant, or salvage after recurrence. Our first choice for patients with advanced HNSCC was cCRT; however, if patients did not have enough organ function but with a favorable performance status, Cetuximab-radiation was applied. RESULTS: From April 2013 to March 2014, 30 patients were identified who were treated with Cetuximab-radiation or cCRT and each cohort consisted of 15 patients. Patients in Cetuximab-radiation cohort suffered from a statistically higher rate of G3/4 dermatitis compared with cCRT cohort (80 vs. 13.3%, respectively, p < 0.001). More patients required unexpected hospitalization due to deterioration of their general condition and total parenteral nutrition in Cetuximab-radiation cohort (p = 0.011 and p = 0.025, respectively). While none experienced GI bleeding in cCRT cohort, four patients experienced GI bleeding including two grade 4 bleeding in Cetuximab-radiation cohort (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It is probable that there exists a group of patients who are susceptible for Cetuximab-radiation not only in terms of well-known dermatitis and mucositis but also of gastrointestinal complications.
Authors: José Baselga; José M Trigo; Jean Bourhis; Jacques Tortochaux; Hernán Cortés-Funes; Ricardo Hitt; Pere Gascón; Nadia Amellal; Andreas Harstrick; André Eckardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alan B G Lansdown; Ursula Mirastschijski; Nicky Stubbs; Elizabeth Scanlon; Magnus S Agren Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.617