OBJECTIVES: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer remains unclear. This study evaluated the benefits of cisplatin-based AC plus surgery versus surgery alone in patients with bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 746 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer were reviewed. The association between AC and survival was analyzed using Cox regression models. To reduce the impact of treatment selection bias and potential confounding in an observational study, significant differences in patient characteristics were rigorously adjusted using inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 746 patients (664 men and 82 women) of mean age 62.4 years and median follow-up of 64.3 months (range, 1-231.4 months). Of these patients, 176 (23.6%) received AC after cystectomy and 570 (76.4%) underwent cystectomy alone. Patients who received AC were significantly younger (60 vs. 63 years, p = 0.001) and significantly more likely to have high pathologic T stage (p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.001), high grade (p = 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001) than patients who underwent cystectomy alone. Multivariable analysis showed a cancer-specific survival (CSS) benefit for AC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.80, p = 0.002], as did low pathologic T stage, absence of lymph node metastasis, and absence of lymphovascular invasion. After IPTW adjustment for baseline characteristics, AC remained an independent predictor of CSS (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-based AC after radical cystectomy had survival benefits in patients with bladder cancer, even after IPTW adjustment for confounding variables.
OBJECTIVES: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer remains unclear. This study evaluated the benefits of cisplatin-based AC plus surgery versus surgery alone in patients with bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 746 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer were reviewed. The association between AC and survival was analyzed using Cox regression models. To reduce the impact of treatment selection bias and potential confounding in an observational study, significant differences in patient characteristics were rigorously adjusted using inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 746 patients (664 men and 82 women) of mean age 62.4 years and median follow-up of 64.3 months (range, 1-231.4 months). Of these patients, 176 (23.6%) received AC after cystectomy and 570 (76.4%) underwent cystectomy alone. Patients who received AC were significantly younger (60 vs. 63 years, p = 0.001) and significantly more likely to have high pathologic T stage (p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.001), high grade (p = 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001) than patients who underwent cystectomy alone. Multivariable analysis showed a cancer-specific survival (CSS) benefit for AC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.80, p = 0.002], as did low pathologic T stage, absence of lymph node metastasis, and absence of lymphovascular invasion. After IPTW adjustment for baseline characteristics, AC remained an independent predictor of CSS (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99, p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS:Cisplatin-based AC after radical cystectomy had survival benefits in patients with bladder cancer, even after IPTW adjustment for confounding variables.
Authors: James E Montie; Peter E Clark; Mario A Eisenberger; Rizk El-Galley; Richard E Greenberg; Harry W Herr; Gary R Hudes; Deborah A Kuban; Timothy M Kuzel; Paul H Lange; Subodh M Lele; Jeffrey Michalski; Anthony Patterson; Kamal S Pohar; Jerome P Richie; Wade J Sexton; William U Shipley; Eric J Small; Donald L Trump; Phillip J Walther; Timothy G Wilson Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Jeffrey J Leow; William Martin-Doyle; Padma S Rajagopal; Chirayu G Patel; Erin M Anderson; Andrew T Rothman; Richard J Cote; Yuksel Urun; Steven L Chang; Toni K Choueiri; Joaquim Bellmunt Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Giacomo Novara; Robert S Svatek; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Eila Skinner; Vincenzo Ficarra; Yves Fradet; Yair Lotan; Hendrik Isbarn; Umberto Capitanio; Patrick J Bastian; Wassim Kassouf; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Jonathan I Izawa; Derya Tilki; Colin P Dinney; Seth P Lerner; Mark Schoenberg; Bjoern G Volkmer; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Cora N Sternberg; S Machele Donat; Joaquim Bellmunt; Randall E Millikan; Walter Stadler; Pieter De Mulder; Amir Sherif; Hans von der Maase; Taiji Tsukamoto; Mark S Soloway Journal: Urology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Sung Han Kim; Ho Kyung Seo; Hee Chul Shin; Sung Ja Chang; Sooin Yun; Jungnam Joo; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyung Suk Kim; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; In Gab Jeong; Seok Ho Kang; Bumsik Hong Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Tae-Yon Sung; Jong Ho Yoon; Minkyu Han; Yi Ho Lee; Yu-Mi Lee; Dong Eun Song; Ki-Wook Chung; Won Bae Kim; Young Kee Shong; Suck Joon Hong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240