Literature DB >> 25119501

Evaluation of docetaxel- and oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients reveals obvious survival benefits in docetaxel-treated mixed signet ring cell carcinoma patients.

Li Chen1, Yan Shi, Jing Yuan, Qian Wu, Yalin Han, Rui Qin, Baoqing Jia, Bo Wei, Lixin Wei, Guanghai Dai, Shunchang Jiao.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS, respectively) in 991 postgastrectomy gastric cancer patients untreated (n = 372) or treated with either oxaliplatin-based (n = 376) or docetaxel-based (n = 243) chemotherapy and to identify prognostic factors that could help establish subgroups of patients who would benefit from such treatment. The median follow-up duration was 55.3 months (range 31.2-90.8 months). Subgroup analyses revealed that gastric adenocarcinoma (DFS 56.9 vs 53.2 months, P = 0.180, χ(2) = 1.802; OS not reached vs 70.7 months, P = 0.521, χ(2) = 0.412), but not absolute signet ring cell (SRC) carcinoma (DFS 15.1/18.0 vs 10.1 months, P = 0.171/0.259, χ(2) = 1.874/1.275; OS 21.0/26.1 vs 20.5 months, P = 0.551/0.196, χ(2) = 0.355/1.674), patients undergoing either docetaxel- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy had a lower risk of recurrence and increased survival in comparison to those without chemotherapy. In the mixed SRC carcinoma patients, DFS and OS of patients treated with docetaxel-based regimen had a longer survival (DFS 50.1 vs 29.9 months, P = 0.046, χ(2) = 3.987; OS not reached vs 48.6 months, P = 0.016, χ(2) = 5.854) and lower risk of recurrence and death (DFS HR 0.540, 95 % CI 0.355-0.874, P = 0.012; OS HR 0.452, 95 % CI 0.259-0.790, P = 0.005) than oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Cumulatively, our results indicate that adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial and that docetaxel-based regimen should be considered for patients with mixed SRC carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119501     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0159-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  18 in total

Review 1.  Differential trends in the intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Angelo Sidoni
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Gastric cancer.

Authors:  Francisco José Fernández-Fernández; Pascual Sesma
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.

Authors:  Farin Kamangar; Graça M Dores; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.

Authors:  Sumin Chae; Anbok Lee; Joo-Ho Lee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Changing pattern of histological type, location, stage and outcome of surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  K Borch; B Jönsson; E Tarpila; T Franzén; J Berglund; E Kullman; L Franzén
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Antitumor activity of docetaxel.

Authors:  J R Eckardt
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Randomized phase II trial evaluating two paclitaxel and cisplatin-containing chemoradiation regimens as adjuvant therapy in resected gastric cancer (RTOG-0114).

Authors:  Gary K Schwartz; Kathryn Winter; Bruce D Minsky; Christopher Crane; P John Thomson; Pramila Anne; Howard Gross; Christopher Willett; David Kelsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Gastric carcinoma in China: Current status and future perspectives (Review).

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhu; Jin Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Differential cytotoxic effects of docetaxel in a range of mammalian tumor cell lines and certain drug resistant sublines in vitro.

Authors:  B T Hill; R D Whelan; S A Shellard; S McClean; L K Hosking
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Pathobiological behavior and molecular mechanism of signet ring cell carcinoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a comparative study.

Authors:  Xue-Fei Yang; Lin Yang; Xiao-Yun Mao; Dong-Ying Wu; Su-Min Zhang; Yan Xin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  13 in total

1.  Prognostic value of diffuse versus intestinal histotype in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Rosa Berenato; Luca Turati; Alessia Mennitto; Francesca Steccanella; Marta Caporale; Pierpaolo Dallera; Filippo de Braud; Ezio Pezzica; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Giovanni Sgroi; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Filippo Pietrantonio; Sandro Barni
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: Impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Simon Pernot; Thibault Voron; Geraldine Perkins; Christine Lagorce-Pages; Anne Berger; Julien Taieb
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparison of treatment strategies and survival of early-onset gastric cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chunmei Zhang; Ruiyi Tang; Hanlong Zhu; Xianxiu Ge; Yue Wang; Xue Wang; Lin Miao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The characteristics and prognostic value of signet ring cell histology in gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study of 2199 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Ming Lu; Zuyao Yang; Qi Feng; Mei Yu; Yuelun Zhang; Chen Mao; Lin Shen; Jinling Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Efficacy of a docetaxel-5FU-oxaliplatin regimen (TEFOX) in first-line treatment of advanced gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: an AGEO multicentre study.

Authors:  Simon Pernot; Olivier Dubreuil; Thomas Aparicio; Karine Le Malicot; David Tougeron; Céline Lepère; Cedric Lecaille; Lysiane Marthey; Juliette Palle; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Aziz Zaanan; Julien Taieb
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Chemoradiotherapy Is Inferior to Chemotherapy Alone in Adjuvant Setting for Signet Ring Cell Containing Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yue-Ting Zhu; Xin-Zu Chen; Ye Chen; Yu-Wen Zhou; Lian-Sha Tang; De-Yun Luo; Qiu Li; Meng Qiu; Xin Wang; Dan Cao; Yu Yang; Ya-Li Shen; Zhi-Ping Li; Feng Bi; Ji-Yan Liu; Hong-Feng Gou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Efficacy of Postoperative FOLFOX Versus XELOX Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer and Prognostic Value of Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients Receiving XELOX.

Authors:  Xin Yin; Tianyi Fang; Yimin Wang; Chunfeng Li; Yufei Wang; Daoxu Zhang; Yingwei Xue
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Prognostic Nomograms for Nonelderly Adults with Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Yao Peng; Qi Huang; Jingjing Wu; Mingjun Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The Efficacy of Taxanes- and Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer After D2 Gastrectomy for Different Lauren Types.

Authors:  Zhen Zheng; Xiance Jin; Qiuxiang He; Baochai Lin; Huafang Su; Hanbin Chen; Shaoran Fei; Zhenghua Fei; Guorong Chen; Huangle Pan; Xiaolei Chen; Congying Xie
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Yang Li; Fu-Hai Ma; Li-Yan Xue; Yan-Tao Tian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.