Literature DB >> 25119280

How do two giant panda populations adapt to their habitats in the Qinling and Qionglai Mountains, China.

Xuehua Liu1, Tiejun Wang, Ting Wang, Andrew K Skidmore, Melissa Songer.   

Abstract

The spatial separation of the Qinling Mountains from the western mountains has caused morphological and genetic distinctions of giant pandas. Could this separation also cause the pandas' behavior change? In this research, we focused on the pandas' movement pattern and selected two wild panda groups in Foping and Wolong Nature Reserves (NR) to represent the populations in the Qinling and Qionglai Mountains, respectively. We hypothesized that the Qinling pandas have developed a different seasonal movement pattern compared with the pandas in the western mountains. We analyzed the radio tracking data from two NRs by using GIS. Our results showed the following significant differences: (1) The Foping pandas live most of the year in the low elevation areas and move higher during June and remain through August while the Wolong pandas live most of the year in the high elevation areas and move lower in April and stay through June; (2) Comparing their low and high elevational areas shows the distinct spatial patterns between reserves, forming two obviously separated clusters in Foping but a single-compact cluster in Wolong; (3) Foping pandas move an average of 425 m ± 147 s.d. daily, while Wolong pandas move an average of 550 m ± 343 s.d. daily; and (4) Three habitat factors (i.e., terrain, temperature, and bamboo nutrient) were taken as the driving forces and analyzed, and they showed a strong support explanation to these different movement behaviors of pandas in two NRs. Our findings have important implications for management, for instance, it needs to be careful considering the behavior difference of the pandas when reintroducing them to the wild.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119280     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3412-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  6 in total

1.  Ecological scale and seasonal heterogeneity in the spatial behaviors of giant pandas.

Authors:  Zejun Zhang; James K Sheppard; Ronald R Swaisgood; Guan Wang; Yonggang Nie; Wei Wei; Naxun Zhao; Fuwen Wei
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.654

2.  Significant genetic boundaries and spatial dynamics of giant pandas occupying fragmented habitat across southwest China.

Authors:  Lifeng Zhu; Shanning Zhang; Xiaodong Gu; Fuwen Wei
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  The first skull of the earliest giant panda.

Authors:  Changzhu Jin; Russell L Ciochon; Wei Dong; Robert M Hunt; Jinyi Liu; Marc Jaeger; Qizhi Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DIFFERENT SPATIAL SCALES OF ADAPTATION IN THE CLIMBING BEHAVIOR OF PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS: GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION, NATURAL SELECTION, AND GENE FLOW.

Authors:  Daniel B Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Genetic differentiation and subspecies development of the giant panda as revealed by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  Qiu-Hong Wan; Sheng-Guo Fang; Hua Wu; Tsutomu Fujihara
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Whole-genome sequencing of giant pandas provides insights into demographic history and local adaptation.

Authors:  Shancen Zhao; Pingping Zheng; Shanshan Dong; Xiangjiang Zhan; Qi Wu; Xiaosen Guo; Yibo Hu; Weiming He; Shanning Zhang; Wei Fan; Lifeng Zhu; Dong Li; Xuemei Zhang; Quan Chen; Hemin Zhang; Zhihe Zhang; Xuelin Jin; Jinguo Zhang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Jun Wang; Fuwen Wei
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 38.330

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Changes of foraging patch selection and utilization by a giant panda after bamboo flowering.

Authors:  Guochun Li; Huadong Song; Latifa A A Altigani; Xueli Zheng; Shuhai Bu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparative habitat use by takin in the Wanglang and Xiaohegou Nature Reserves.

Authors:  Dongwei Kang; Shuang Li; Xiaorong Wang; Jian Huang; Junqing Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Diversity and activity patterns of sympatric animals among four types of forest habitat in Guanyinshan Nature Reserve in the Qinling Mountains, China.

Authors:  Xuehua Liu; Pengfeng Wu; Xiaoming Shao; Melissa Songer; Qiong Cai; Xiangbo He; Yun Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Role of New Nature Reserve in Assisting Endangered Species Conservation - Case Study of Giant Pandas in the Northern Qionglai Mountains, China.

Authors:  Tian-Pei Guan; Jacob R Owens; Ming-Hao Gong; Gang Liu; Zhi-Yun Ouyang; Yan-Ling Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Population genomics reveals moderate genetic differentiation between populations of endangered Forest Musk Deer located in Shaanxi and Sichuan.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Bao-Feng Zhang; Jiang Chang; Xiao-Long Hu; Chao Li; Tin-Tao Xu; Shu-Qiang Liu; De-Fu Hu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.547

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.