Literature DB >> 25119194

Optimal duration of anticoagulation. Provoked versus unprovoked VTE and role of adjunctive thrombophilia and imaging tests.

Paolo Prandoni1, Sofia Barbar, Marta Milan, Elena Campello, Luca Spiezia, Chiara Piovella, Raffaele Pesavento.   

Abstract

Once anticoagulation is stopped, the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) over years after a first episode is consistently around 30%. This risk is higher in patients with unprovoked than in those with (transient) provoked VTE, and among the latter in patients with medical than in those with surgical risk factors. Baseline parameters that have been found to be related to the risk of recurrent VTE are the proximal location of deep-vein thrombosis, obesity, old age, male sex and non-0 blood group, whereas the role of inherited thrombophilia is controversial. The persistence of residual vein thrombosis at ultrasound assessment has consistently been shown to increase the risk, as do persistently high values of D-dimer and the early development of the post-thrombotic syndrome. Although the latest international guidelines suggest indefinite anticoagulation for most patients with the first episode of unprovoked VTE, strategies that incorporate the assessment of residual vein thrombosis and D-dimer have the potential to identify subjects in whom anticoagulation can be safely discontinued. Moreover, new opportunities are offered by a few emerging anti-Xa and anti-IIa oral compounds, which are likely to induce fewer haemorrhagic complications than vitamin K antagonists while preserving the same effectiveness; and by low-dose aspirin, which has the potential to prevent the occurrence of both venous and arterial thrombotic events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Venous thromboembolism; anticoagulation; deep venous thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; residual thrombosis; thrombophilia; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119194     DOI: 10.1160/TH14-04-0396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  3 in total

Review 1.  Role of thrombophilia testing: con.

Authors:  Scott M Stevens
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  The treatment of venous thromboembolism with novel oral anticoagulants: warnings and limitations.

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Comparison of antithrombin-dependent and direct inhibitors of factor Xa or thrombin on the kinetics and qualitative characteristics of blood clots.

Authors:  Stella Salta; Loula Papageorgiou; Annette K Larsen; Patrick Van Dreden; Claire Soulier; Dennis V Cokkinos; Ismail Elalamy; Grigoris T Gerotziafas
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-07-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.