T B Mole1, M A Irvine1, Y Worbe2, P Collins1, S P Mitchell1, S Bolton1, N A Harrison3, T W Robbins2, V Voon1. 1. Department of Psychiatry,University of Cambridge,Cambridge,UK. 2. Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute,University of Cambridge,Cambridge,UK. 3. Brighton and Sussex Medical School,University of Sussex,Brighton,UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests some overlap between the pathological use of food and drugs, yet how impulsivity compares across these different clinical disorders remains unclear. Substance use disorders are commonly characterized by elevated impulsivity, and impulsivity subtypes may show commonalities and differences in various conditions. We hypothesized that obese subjects with binge-eating disorder (BED) and abstinent alcohol-dependent cohorts would have relatively more impulsive profiles compared to obese subjects without BED. We also predicted decision impulsivity impairment in obesity with and without BED. METHOD: Thirty obese subjects with BED, 30 without BED and 30 abstinent alcohol-dependent subjects and age- and gender-matched controls were tested on delay discounting (preference for a smaller immediate reward over a larger delayed reward), reflection impulsivity (rapid decision making prior to evidence accumulation) and motor response inhibition (action cancellation of a prepotent response). RESULTS: All three groups had greater delay discounting relative to healthy volunteers. Both obese subjects without BED and alcohol-dependent subjects had impaired motor response inhibition. Only obese subjects without BED had impaired integration of available information to optimize outcomes over later trials with a cost condition. CONCLUSIONS: Delay discounting appears to be a common core impairment across disorders of food and drug intake. Unexpectedly, obese subjects without BED showed greater impulsivity than obese subjects with BED. We highlight the dissociability and heterogeneity of impulsivity subtypes and add to the understanding of neurocognitive profiles across disorders involving food and drugs. Our results have therapeutic implications suggesting that disorder-specific patterns of impulsivity could be targeted.
BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests some overlap between the pathological use of food and drugs, yet how impulsivity compares across these different clinical disorders remains unclear. Substance use disorders are commonly characterized by elevated impulsivity, and impulsivity subtypes may show commonalities and differences in various conditions. We hypothesized that obese subjects with binge-eating disorder (BED) and abstinent alcohol-dependent cohorts would have relatively more impulsive profiles compared to obese subjects without BED. We also predicted decision impulsivity impairment in obesity with and without BED. METHOD: Thirty obese subjects with BED, 30 without BED and 30 abstinent alcohol-dependent subjects and age- and gender-matched controls were tested on delay discounting (preference for a smaller immediate reward over a larger delayed reward), reflection impulsivity (rapid decision making prior to evidence accumulation) and motor response inhibition (action cancellation of a prepotent response). RESULTS: All three groups had greater delay discounting relative to healthy volunteers. Both obese subjects without BED and alcohol-dependent subjects had impaired motor response inhibition. Only obese subjects without BED had impaired integration of available information to optimize outcomes over later trials with a cost condition. CONCLUSIONS: Delay discounting appears to be a common core impairment across disorders of food and drug intake. Unexpectedly, obese subjects without BED showed greater impulsivity than obese subjects with BED. We highlight the dissociability and heterogeneity of impulsivity subtypes and add to the understanding of neurocognitive profiles across disorders involving food and drugs. Our results have therapeutic implications suggesting that disorder-specific patterns of impulsivity could be targeted.
Authors: Fernando Fernández-Aranda; Susana Jiménez-Murcia; Eva M Alvarez-Moya; Roser Granero; Julio Vallejo; Cynthia M Bulik Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Charlotte R Housden; Sean S O'Sullivan; Eileen M Joyce; Andrew J Lees; Jonathan P Roiser Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Bruno B Averbeck; Atbin Djamshidian; Sean S O'Sullivan; Charlotte R Housden; Jonathan P Roiser; Andrew J Lees Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Daina Economidou; David E H Theobald; Trevor W Robbins; Barry J Everitt; Jeffrey W Dalley Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-04-18 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Lauren VanderBroek-Stice; Monika K Stojek; Steven R H Beach; Michelle R vanDellen; James MacKillop Journal: Appetite Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Marjolein M Geerts; Elske M van den Berg; Laura van Riel; Jaap Peen; Anna E Goudriaan; Jack J M Dekker Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Michael Amlung; Emma Marsden; Katherine Holshausen; Vanessa Morris; Herry Patel; Lana Vedelago; Katherine R Naish; Derek D Reed; Randi E McCabe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Lívia Dayane Sousa Azevedo; Ana Paula Leme de Souza; Isabella Marta Scanavez Ferreira; Deivson Wendell da Costa Lima; Rosane Pilot Pessa Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: David B Sarwer; Kelly C Allison; Thomas A Wadden; Rebecca Ashare; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Courtney McCuen-Wurst; Caitlin LaGrotte; Noel N Williams; Michael Edwards; Colleen Tewksbury; Jingwei Wu Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2019-02-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Henrik Ohlsson; Dace S Svikis; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 18.112