Associations between polymorphisms of the CD36 gene and susceptibility to coronary artery heart disease (CHD) are not clear. We assessed allele frequencies and genotype distributions of CD36 gene polymorphisms in 112 CHD patients and 129 control patients using semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Additionally, we detected CD36 mRNA expression by real-time quantitative PCR, and we quantified plasma levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). There were no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05) in allele frequencies of rs1761667 or in genotype distribution and allele frequencies of rs3173798. The genotype distribution of rs1761667 significantly differed between CHD patients and controls (P=0.034), with a significantly higher frequency of the AG genotype in the CHD group compared to the control group (P=0.011). The plasma levels of ox-LDL in patients with the AG genotype were remarkably higher than those with the GG and AA genotypes (P=0.010). In a randomized sample taken from patients in the two groups, the CD36 mRNA expression of the CHD patients was higher than that of the controls. In CHD patients, the CD36 mRNA expression in AG genotype patients was remarkably higher than in those with an AA genotype (P=0.005). After adjusted logistic regression analysis, the AG genotype of rs1761667 was associated with an increased risk of CHD (OR=2.337, 95% CI=1.336-4.087, P=0.003). In conclusion, the rs1761667 polymorphism may be closely associated with developing CHD in the Chongqing Han population of China, and an AG genotype may be a genetic susceptibility factor for CHD.
Associations between polymorphisms of the CD36 gene and susceptibility to coronary artery heart disease (CHD) are not clear. We assessed allele frequencies and genotype distributions of CD36 gene polymorphisms in 112 CHD patients and 129 control patients using semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Additionally, we detected CD36 mRNA expression by real-time quantitative PCR, and we quantified plasma levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). There were no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05) in allele frequencies of rs1761667 or in genotype distribution and allele frequencies of rs3173798. The genotype distribution of rs1761667 significantly differed between CHD patients and controls (P=0.034), with a significantly higher frequency of the AG genotype in the CHD group compared to the control group (P=0.011). The plasma levels of ox-LDL in patients with the AG genotype were remarkably higher than those with the GG and AA genotypes (P=0.010). In a randomized sample taken from patients in the two groups, the CD36 mRNA expression of the CHD patients was higher than that of the controls. In CHD patients, the CD36 mRNA expression in AG genotype patients was remarkably higher than in those with an AA genotype (P=0.005). After adjusted logistic regression analysis, the AG genotype of rs1761667 was associated with an increased risk of CHD (OR=2.337, 95% CI=1.336-4.087, P=0.003). In conclusion, the rs1761667 polymorphism may be closely associated with developing CHD in the Chongqing Han population of China, and an AG genotype may be a genetic susceptibility factor for CHD.
Coronary artery heart disease (CHD) is a major cause of adult cardiovascular morbidity
and mortality (1). Atherosclerosis (AS) has been
shown to be a critical step in CHD, and lipid metabolism disorder is a key factor in AS
(2). Recent studies have found that most CHD
patients have a family history of CHD and that genetic factors play an important role in
the incidence of CHD (3). However, the genetic
risk factors of CHD have not been fully determined.CD36, a member of the B family of scavenger receptors, has been shown to be a
high-affinity receptor for oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) and plays a key
role in the development of AS (4). It has already
been demonstrated that CD36 expression is significantly increased in CHD patients and
that this could reflect the severity of coronary artery AS to a certain degree (5,6). In the
humanCD36 gene, 1372 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been
reported to date (7). Associations of some SNPs
(e.g., rs5956, rs3173798, and rs3211892) with CHD have been detected, but the
conclusions are controversial (8,9). Other SNPs (e.g., rs1761667, rs1527483,
rs1049673, and rs3211931) have been shown to be related with type 2 diabetes mellitus
(T2DM) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) but do not have direct association with CHD (10,11).
Moreover, most of these findings were reported in European populations. Therefore, our
study selected two SNPs, rs1761667, located in the 5′ flanking exon 1A region (12) and rs3173798, located in the intron 3 region
(13), as candidate SNPs to evaluate the
genetic and functional effects of CD36 gene polymorphisms on CHD
development in the Chongqing Han population of China.
Material and Methods
Study population
Patients were enrolled from March 2012 to June 2013 at the Second Affiliated Hospital
of Chongqing Medical University. The enrollment criteria for patients in the CHD
group included: a) older than 18 years of age, b) a diagnosis of CHD according to the
World Health Organization (WHO) CHD diagnostic criteria set in 1979, and c) a
stenosis degree greater than or equal to 50% in at least one artery determined by
angiography. Healthy outpatients were included in the control group. Extreme care was
taken to exclude CHD patients through relevant examinations. The case exclusion
criteria included patients with: a) systemic diseases such as inflammation, rheumatic
autoimmune diseases, tumor, liver and kidney diseases and b) any kinship association
with any other subject. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of
the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Written informed
consent was given by every patient or her/his legally authorized representative prior
to study participation.
First, 2 mL peripheral venous blood was collected from each subject using
EDTA-anticoagulant tubes. Then, genomic DNA was extracted according to a standard
protocol using a TIANamp blood DNA kit (TIANGEN, China), and was genotyped by
polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) for
rs1761667 and rs3173798. The primers (TAKARA, Japan), amplification parameters, and
restriction enzymes for each round of PCR are shown in Table 1. The target DNA sequence of rs3173798 was amplified by
mismatched and nested PCR. The digestion products were visualized on a 4% agarose gel
and stained with GoldView™ (SBS Genetech, China).
Direct sequencing was also performed by the Shanghai Invitrogen Co., Ltd. (China) for
randomly selected subjects to validate the methods used in this study.
Real-time quantitative PCR
Total RNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of patients using the TRIzol
Reagent (TIANGEN, China), chloroform, and isopropanol. cDNA was then synthesized
using a reverse transcription kit (TAKARA). Real-time PCR was performed to compare
CD36 mRNA expression between the two groups and was determined using the
SYBR¯ Premix Ex Taq™ II (Perfect Real Time, TAKARA) and normalized to
β-actin mRNA levels. The relative expression levels were calculated using the
2-ΔΔCt method (15). The sense
and antisense primers used in this experiment are shown in Table 2.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Plasma ox-LDL concentrations were measured by ELISA. Whole blood was centrifuged at
750 g to separate plasma from blood cells. Then, the subsequent
steps in the protocol were conducted according to the manufacturer's recommendations
(Shanghai Hushang Co., Ltd., China). Finally, the absorbance was immediately assayed
at 450 nm using a micro-plate reader (Thermo Fisher 1510, USA).
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as means±SD, as counts or as percentages. A χ-test or the Student t-test was performed to compare the
genotypes and means between the two groups. Statistical analyses for multiple group
data measurements were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and a
subsequent least significant difference (LSD) test was used to compare any two means
when there were significant differences among multiple groups. P<0.05 was
considered to be statistically significant. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested
using a χ-test to judge the reliability of the gene frequency. Logistic regression
analysis was performed to screen for CHD risk factors, to predict the occurrence of
CHD, and to reveal the association of rs1761667 polymorphism with CHD. Odds ratios
(ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the significance of
differences in relative risk. PASW Statistics 18.0 (WinWrap¯ Basic, USA)
was used for all the analyses.
Results
Baseline clinical characteristics
The CHD group included 112 patients (69 males), with an average age of 64.04±10.27
years, while the control group included 129 patients (55 males), with an average age
of 61.68±14.80 years. The detailed clinical characteristics are shown in Table 3.
Genotypes and allele frequencies
RFLP analysis confirmed that there were three genotypes (GG, AG, and AA) for
rs1761667 (Figure 2A) and three genotypes (TT,
CT, and CC) for rs3173798 (Figure 3A) in the
chipping fragments. The distribution of rs1761667 genotypes between the two groups
was significantly different (P=0.034), with the frequency of the AG genotype being
significantly higher in the CHD group than in the control group (P=0.011, Figure 2B). There were no significant differences
between the two groups in the allele frequencies of rs1761667 or in the genotype
distribution and allele frequencies of rs3173798 (all P>0.05; Figures 2C, 3B and C). The
genotype distribution of rs1761667 and rs3173798 conformed well to the Hardy-Weinberg
expectation in both groups (all P>0.05).
Figure 2
Distribution of genotypes and alleles of rs1761667 between coronary artery
heart disease (CHD) patients and healthy controls. A, There
are three genotypes of rs1761667 in the chipping fragments displayed by RFLP
analysis: AA (595 bp), GG (362+233 bp) and AG (595+362+233 bp).
B, The frequencies of three kinds of genotypes (GG, AG, AA)
of rs1761667 in the CHD group and control group were 38.39, 53.57, 8.04%, and
49.61, 37.21, 13.18%, respectively. The distribution of genotypes in the CHD
group and control group had a significant difference (*P=0.034), with the
frequency of AG genotype significantly higher in the CHD group than in the
control group (P=0.011). C, The frequencies of G/A alleles of
rs1761667 in the CHD group and control group were 65.18, 34.82, and 68.22,
31.78%, respectively. No significant difference in the distributions of G/A
allele frequencies was observed between the two groups (P=0.480). The
χ test was used for statistical analyses.
Figure 3
Distribution of genotypes and alleles of rs3173798 between coronary artery
heart disease (CHD) patients and healthy controls. A, There
are three genotypes of rs3173798 in the chipping fragments displayed by RFLP
analysis: TT (121 bp), CC (102+19 bp) and CT (121+102+19 bp) in theory, but,
the molecule of 19 bp was so small that the band of electrophoresis was too
weak to observe, and the molecule of 121 and 102 bp were too close that the
bands of electrophoresis were not easily to distinguished. Thus, CC genotype
had only one band of 102 bp, and CT genotype had a thick and bright band of the
combination of 121 and 102 bp. B, Frequencies of the three
genotypes (TT, CT, CC) of rs3173798 in the CHD group and control group were
36.61, 42.86, 20.53%, and 41.54, 40.00, 18.46%, respectively. There was no
significant difference in distribution of genotypes between the two groups
(P=0.732). C, Frequencies of C/T alleles of rs3173798 in the
CHD group and control group were 58.04, 41.96, and 61.54, 38.46%, respectively.
No significant difference in the distributions of C/T allele frequencies was
observed between the two groups (P=0.433). The χ test was used for statistical analyses.
The results of direct sequencing were consistent with identifications made by agarose
gel electrophoresis.
CD36 mRNA expression in patient subgroups
We genotyped 42 cases for the 3 genotypes of rs1761667 occurring randomly in
CD36 and then detected their CD36 mRNA expression by real-time
PCR. The expression of CD36 at the mRNA level in the CHD group was significantly
higher than that in the control group (P<0.001), with significant differences in
the CHD patients with an AG genotype of rs1761667 compared with those with an AA
genotype (P=0.005, Figure 4).
Figure 4
CD36 mRNA expression of coronary artery heart disease (CHD) patients and
healthy controls. A, The expression of CD36 mRNA in CHD
patients (2.21±1.55) was significantly higher than that of healthy controls
(1.36±1.01; P<0.001). B, There were significant differences
in the CD36 mRNA expression in CHD patients with different genotypes of
rs1761667 (**P=0.018), and the CD36 mRNA expression in CHD patients with AG
genotype (2.86±1.70) were remarkably higher than those with AA genotype
(1.53±0.78; P=0.005). No significant differences were observed in CD36 mRNA
expression of CHD patients with GG (2.24±1.72) and AG or AA genotype (P=0.173,
P=0.125, respectively). The t-test was used for statistical
analyses.
Plasma ox-LDL levels
ELISA analysis indicated that the plasma levels (pg/mL) of ox-LDL in the CHD group
were much higher than that in the control group (P=0.037). Furthermore, the plasma
ox-LDL levels in CHD patients were significantly different in patients with the three
different genotypes (P=0.010, Figure 5).
Figure 5
Plasma level of ox-LDL between coronary artery heart disease (CHD) patients
and healthy controls. A. The plasma level of ox-LDL in CHD patients
(646.24±369.99 μg/L) was significantly higher than that of healthy controls
(555.91±283.68 μg/L), with *P=0.037. B, There were significant
differences in the plasma levels of ox-LDL in CHD patients with different
genotypes of rs1761667 (**P=0.010); and the plasma levels of ox-LDL in CHD
patients with AG genotype (741.38±418.39 μg/L) were significantly higher than
those with GG and AA genotypes (551.01±271.41 μg/L, P=0.009; 386.35±201.52
μg/L, P=0.034, respectively). No significant differences were observed in
plasma levels of CHD patients with GG and AA genotypes (P=0.523). The
t-test was used for statistical analyses.
Screening for risk factors of CHD
We screened the risk factors of CHD and predicted its occurrence with logistic
regression analysis. Genotypes of rs1761667 and rs3173798 were considered, as well as
traditional risk factors of CHD such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI),
hypertension, dyslipidemia, T2DM, smoking history and family history of CHD,
triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and LDL.
The results showed that age, current smoking, family history of CHD, LDL and the AG
genotype of rs1761667 factored into the final equation (P<0.05, Table 4). The predictive equation was
established according to the parameters in Table
4: Logit (P)=Ln
(P/[1-P])=0.849 (AG
genotype)+0.027(age)+0.365(LDL)+1.314(current smoking)+1.327(family history of
CHD)-3.711. P≥0.5 indicates occurrence of CHD, and P<0.5 indicates no occurrence
of CHD. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of the logistic
regression model were 65.98, 54.05, 76.15, and 0.302%, respectively.
Effect of rs1761667 polymorphism on CHD
Table 5 shows that the AG genotype could
increase the risk of CHD in both unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models
(unadjusted OR=1.947, 95% CI=1.163-3.259, P=0.011; adjusted OR=2.337, 95%
CI=1.336-4.087, P=0.003).
Associations of rs1761667 genotypes with clinical indexes in the CHD
group
No differences were observed in TG, TC, HDL, LDL, or BMI of CHD patients with
different genotypes of rs1761667 (all P>0.05, Table 6).
Discussion
Main findings
We evaluated the associations between polymorphisms of the rs1761667/rs3173798 SNPs
in the CD36 gene and the susceptibility to CHD in 112 CHD patients
and 129 healthy controls in the Chongqing Han population of China. We found
significant differences in the genotype distribution of rs1761667 between the CHD and
control groups, with a significantly higher frequency of the AG genotype in the CHD
group compared to the control group. The plasma levels of ox-LDL in patients with CHD
were higher than those of controls and were related to the genotypes of rs1761667. In
a randomized sample from the two groups, CD36 mRNA expression was higher in CHD
patients than in controls and was related to specific rs1761667 genotypes.These findings indicated that rs1761667 polymorphism may be closely associated with
the risk of developing CHD in the Chongqing Han population of China, and that the AG
genotype may be a genetic susceptibility factor for CHD. To our knowledge, this is
the first time that an association has been reported between rs1761667 polymorphism
in the CD36 gene and CHD, particularly in relation to the AG
genotype in rs1761667. This result may provide evidence for the role of rs1761667
polymorphism in CHD development.
Association between CD36 and diseases
CD36 has been shown to have functions in mediating the uptake of ox-LDL and acting as
a high affinity receptor for ox-LDL in foam cell formation. Researchers hypothesize
that it plays a role in the development of CHD. They have found that CD36 expression
in monocytes is increased in patients with CHD and that this could reflect the
severity of coronary artery AS to a certain extent (5,6). Moreover, CD36 mRNA
expression has been shown to increase significantly in patients with CHD, and its
expression in circulating monocytes may be a marker for CHD (16,17). Therefore, we
randomly genotyped 42 CHD patients carrying three genotypes of the rs1761667 allele
and then detected their CD36 mRNA expression. The mRNA expression level of CD36 in
the CHD group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.001).
Our results are similar to those reported in previous studies, but in contrast to
those reports, we compared the CD36 mRNA expression levels of CHD patients carrying
different genotypes and found that the expression was significantly higher in CHD
patients with the AG genotype than in those with the AA genotype (P=0.005).
Associations between rs1761667 polymorphism in the CD36 gene and
diseases
Although rs1761667 polymorphism affects lipid metabolism and oral fat perception and
the genotype AG was found to be more prevalent among MetS and T2DM patients (10,18),
the association of rs1761667 polymorphism with CHD remains to be clarified. In
accordance with the previously mentioned studies, we found rs1761667 polymorphism in
the CHD group. Contrary to those studies, our subjects were actual patients with CHD.
We found that the genotype distributions of rs1761667 in the CHD and control groups
were significantly different (P=0.034), with the frequency of the AG genotype being
significantly higher in the CHD group (P=0.011). No significant difference was
observed in the allele frequencies of G/A between the two groups (P=0.480). After
adjustments for age, sex, BMI, hypertension, dyslipidemia, T2DM, smoking history,
family history of CHD, TG, TC, HDL, and LDL in logistic regression, the results still
indicated that the AG genotype of rs1761667 correlated with an increased risk of CHD
(OR=2.337, 95% CI=1.336-4.087, P=0.003). Logistic regression analysis showed that the
AG genotype of rs1761667 was an independent risk factor for CHD. Furthermore, we
found that rs1761667 polymorphism was closely related to CD36 mRNA expression and
ox-LDL plasma levels. These results indicated that polymorphism of rs1761667 may be
associated with the risk of CHD in the Chongqing Han population of China and that the
AG genotype may be a genetic susceptibility factor for patients with CHD. To the best
of our knowledge, this is the first study to report on an association between
rs1761667 polymorphism and CHD.
Associations between rs3173798 polymorphism in the CD36 gene and
diseases
Recent studies on the polymorphisms of the CD36 gene indicate that
rs3173798 polymorphism may impact MetS pathophysiology and HDL metabolism and may
lead to higher prevalence rates of obesity and diabetes, as well as increased
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level, all of which are cardiovascular risk
factors (19,20). However, other studies did not find evidence that rs3173798
polymorphism was associated with radiological markers of AS progression in Caucasian
patients diagnosed with CHD at a young age. Additionally, rs3173798 did not seem to
be involved in the risk of early onset CHD in Caucasian populations (8,9).
Associations of rs3173798 polymorphism with CHD seem to be controversial.
Furthermore, most of the studies assessed European populations. Similar to the
above-mentioned studies (8,9), we observed an rs3173798 polymorphism in the
CHD group, but there was no significant difference in the distribution of genotypes
and T/C allele frequencies between the two groups in the Chongqing Han population
(all P>0.05). We preliminarily deduced that rs3173798 polymorphism had no direct
correlation with CHD.
Relationship of rs1761667 polymorphism in the CD36 gene with
CD36 mRNA expression
Similar to previous publications (16,17), we found that CD36 mRNA expression was
significantly higher in the CHD group than in the control group in a randomized
sample taken from the two groups (P<0.001).Furthermore, we compared CD36 mRNA expression among a random total of 21 CHD patients
carrying different genotypes of rs1761667 and found that the CD36 mRNA expression in
the CHD patients with an AG genotype was remarkably higher than in those with the AA
genotype (P=0.005). This result indicated that rs1761667 polymorphism seems to be
involved in CHD pathogenesis.
Relationship of rs1761667 polymorphism in the CD36 gene with
ox-LDL
It is well known that the combination of ox-LDL with CD36 can induce foam cell
formation and CHD development. A previous study indicated that ox-LDL concentrations
were higher in CHD individuals than in non-CHD individuals (21), and our findings were similar. Another study (22) suggested a significant interaction between
CD36 gene polymorphisms and ox-LDL metabolism in the etiology of
colorectal cancer. However, there have been few reports on the association of plasma
ox-LDL levels with CD36 polymorphisms in CHD patients. We found that
CHD patients with an AG genotype had higher plasma ox-LDL levels than those with GG
or AA genotypes (P=0.010). This demonstrates that plasma ox-LDL level and rs1761667
polymorphism have a close relationship. We conclude that the AG genotype of the
rs1761667 polymorphism in the CD36 gene may be involved in CHD
pathogenesis.
Limitations
Although CHD is a common disease and occurs frequently, the percentage of patients
who undergo angiography is relatively small. Although angiography is recommended for
symptomatic patients, less than 50 percent of patients actually complete one. This
may be due to the poor economy and conservative approach to healthcare in the
southwestern region of China. The subjects of our study were CHD patients with
angiography-confirmed stenosis of 50% or more in at least one artery. This inclusion
criterion tended to reduce the size of the enrollment-eligible population. In
addition, as our study was only performed in the Chongqing Han region of China, it is
not entirely clear whether this association may also exist in other populations.
Furthermore, although our results suggested that rs1761667 in the
CD36 gene was associated with the development of CHD, it is still
unknown whether and how the SNP influences CHD. Therefore, it is necessary to perform
studies with a larger sample size and to include data from other racial and regional
populations. More functional and linkage studies are also required to investigate the
exact role that CD36 gene polymorphisms play in CHD.
Authors: Jun Pu; Gary S Mintz; Sinan Biro; Jin-Bae Lee; Stephen T Sum; Sean P Madden; Allen P Burke; Pei Zhang; Ben He; James A Goldstein; Gregg W Stone; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Akiko Maehara Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D Teupser; M A Mueller; J Koglin; W Wilfert; J Ernst; W von Scheidt; G Steinbeck; D Seidel; J Thiery Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Date: 2007-12-07 Impact factor: 2.557
Authors: Latisha Love-Gregory; Richard Sherva; Lingwei Sun; Jon Wasson; Timothy Schappe; Alessandro Doria; D C Rao; Steven C Hunt; Samuel Klein; Rosalind J Neuman; M Alan Permutt; Nada A Abumrad Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sabrina E Noel; Chao-Qiang Lai; Josiemer Mattei; Laurence D Parnell; Jose M Ordovas; Katherine L Tucker Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Xiaowei Ma; Simonetta Bacci; Wojciech Mlynarski; Lucia Gottardo; Teresa Soccio; Claudia Menzaghi; Elisabetta Iori; Robert A Lager; Adhir R Shroff; Ernest V Gervino; Richard W Nesto; Michael T Johnstone; Nada A Abumrad; Angelo Avogaro; Vincenzo Trischitta; Alessandro Doria Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2004-07-28 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sophie Collot-Teixeira; Juliette Martin; Chris McDermott-Roe; Robin Poston; John Louis McGregor Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2007-03-14 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Ahmed Boghdady; Usama Ahmed Arafa; Eman A Sabet; Eman Salama; Ahmed El Sharawy; Mahmoud I Elbadry Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2016-04
Authors: Habiba Bajit; O Ait Si Mohammed; Y Guennoun; S Benaich; E Bouaiti; H Belghiti; M Mrabet; E M Elfahime; N E El Haloui; N Saeid; K El Kari; A Hichami; N A Khan; H Benkirane; H Aguenaou Journal: J Nutr Sci Date: 2020-06-30
Authors: Chuan Gao; Ian C McDowell; Shiwen Zhao; Christopher D Brown; Barbara E Engelhardt Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 4.475