Literature DB >> 25118120

Treatment and outcomes of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a regionalized system of care based on presence or absence of initial shockable cardiac arrest rhythm.

Joseph L Thomas1, Nichole Bosson2, Amy H Kaji2, Yong Ji3, Gene Sung4, David M Shavelle5, William J French6, William Koenig7, James T Niemann2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions complicated by out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a regional system of care. In this retrospective study, the effect of the absence of an initial shockable arrest rhythm was analyzed. The primary end point of survival with good neurologic outcome in patients with and without an initial shockable arrest rhythm was adjusted for age, witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and treatment with therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention. One-hundred sixty-eight of 348 patients (49%) survived to hospital discharge. Patients with a shockable initial rhythm were more likely to receive therapeutic hypothermia (48% vs 37%, risk ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 1.5) and to be treated in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (80% vs 43%, risk ratio 2.8, 95% CI 2.0 to 3.8). The likelihood of survival with good neurologic outcome in patients with a shockable initial rhythm compared with those presenting without a shockable rhythm was 4.8 (95% CI 2.7 to 8.7). In patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, the likelihood of survival with good neurologic outcome was higher (risk ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.8) in those with a shockable rhythm. In conclusion, the absence of an initial shockable rhythm in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions plus out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with significantly worse survival and neurologic outcome. These differences persist despite application of therapies including therapeutic hypothermia and percutaneous coronary intervention within a regionalized system of care.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25118120     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Variability in functional outcome and treatment practices by treatment center after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: analysis of International Cardiac Arrest Registry.

Authors:  Teresa L May; Christine W Lary; Richard R Riker; Hans Friberg; Nainesh Patel; Eldar Søreide; John A McPherson; Johan Undén; Robert Hand; Kjetil Sunde; Pascal Stammet; Stein Rubertsson; Jan Belohlvaek; Allison Dupont; Karen G Hirsch; Felix Valsson; Karl Kern; Farid Sadaka; Johan Israelsson; Josef Dankiewicz; Niklas Nielsen; David B Seder; Sachin Agarwal
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Factors associated with performing urgent coronary angiography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Authors:  David H Lam; Lauren M Glassmoyer; Jordan B Strom; Roger B Davis; James M McCabe; Donald E Cutlip; Michael W Donnino; Michael N Cocchi; Duane S Pinto
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  LDIAED: A lightweight deep learning algorithm implementable on automated external defibrillators.

Authors:  Fahimeh Nasimi; Mohammadreza Yazdchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Is Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests Worse During Days of National Academic Meetings in Japan? A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Tetsuhisa Kitamura; Kosuke Kiyohara; Tasuku Matsuyama; Toshihiro Hatakeyama; Tomonari Shimamoto; Junichi Izawa; Chika Nishiyama; Taku Iwami
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 3.211

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.