Literature DB >> 25117987

Timing of complementary food introduction and age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SEARCH nutrition ancillary study (SNAS).

T L Crume1, J Crandell2, J M Norris1, D Dabelea1, M T Fangman2, D J Pettitt3, L Dolan4, B L Rodriguez5, R O'Connor6, E J Mayer-Davis2.   

Abstract

The association between timing of complementary food introduction and age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes was investigated among 1077 children in the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Age at diagnosis was 5 months earlier for children introduced to sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in the first 12 months of life compared with those who were not (9.0±0.2 vs 9.5±0.1; P=0.02) independent of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) risk status. Analyses stratified by HLA risk status found that children with a high-risk HLA genotype had an earlier age at diagnosis if they were introduced to fruit juice in the first year of life (mean age at diagnosis=9.3±0.1, 9.1±0.1 and 9.6±0.2 for introduction at ⩽6 months, between 7 and 11 months and ⩾12 months, respectively; P=0.04). Introduction of SSB in the first year of life may accelerate the onset of type 1 diabetes independent of HLA risk status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25117987      PMCID: PMC4414319          DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


INTRODUCTION

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is one of the leading chronic diseases of childhood, affecting 1.54 youth per 1,000 in the U.S. according to the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study (1). The autoimmunity that precedes type 1 diabetes can appear in the first year of life suggesting that early environmental exposures may trigger the disease process (2). An increasing body of evidence suggests that type and timing of complementary food introduction may play a role in the etiology (3). Early infant diet patterns may lead to accelerated childhood growth, beta-cell overload and accelerated failure of beta cells in the face of an autoimmune attack, especially among genetically predisposed individuals, resulting in an earlier at onset of type 1 diabetes (4;5). We tested the hypothesis that timing of introduction of selected types of complementary foods and beverages was associated with earlier age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes using data collected by SEARCH Nutrition Ancillary Study (SNAS).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

SNAS is an ancillary study to SEARCH that retrospectively collected infant diet history among youth diagnosed with type 1 diabetes between 2002 and 2005. SEARCH is a multicenter population-based ascertainment of youth < 20 years of age with newly diagnosed (incident) non-gestational diabetes recruited from four geographically defined populations throughout the United States. A detailed description of the SEARCH study methods has been published elsewhere (6). Fasting blood samples at the baseline SEARCH visit were analyzed for two diabetes autoantibodies (DA): glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 (GAD65) and insulinoma- associated-2 (IA-2) using a standardized protocol. In addition, Human Leukocyte Antigen class II genotyping (HLA DR-DQ) was performed with a PCR-based sequence-specific oligonucleotype 1 diabetes probe system. Genetic susceptibility to autoimmunity was categorized based on recommendations by the Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Consortium (7). The SNAS study asked mothers or primary guardians of SEARCH participants to complete a questionnaire that asked about breastfeeding duration and timing of introduction of various beverages and foods common in the infant diet (19 total items). Respondents were asked the age of the child in months when the listed food or beverage was introduced on a regular basis, defined as “at least once per week” with an additional option of “not given regularly in the first year”. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board(s) and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Subjects for this analysis included youth in the SNAS study diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and positive for at least one DA (GAD65 or IA-2). The relationship between age at introduction and age at diagnosis was modeled using linear regression, adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, total household income, birth year, breastfeeding (never, 1 day through 5months, ≥ 6 months), HLA risk status, and exposure to maternal diabetes in utero. Subsequently, an interaction term was added to the full model to test for potential effect modification by HLA risk group (high risk vs. low risk).

RESULTS

There were 1,077 participants in the SEARCH/ SNAS study. The mean age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes was 9.4 ± 3.9 years, average time between diagnosis of diabetes and administration of the SNAS questionnaire was 5.4 ± 1.4 years and average age of child at the SNAS visit was 11.3 ± 4.2 years. Seventy-seven percent of participants were non-Hispanic white, 11% were Hispanic, 9% were black and 3% were of other race and non-Hispanic ethnicity. Forty-three percent of respondents reported breastfeeding for ≥ 6 months, 30% for 1 day to 5 months, and 27% reported that the child never received breast milk. Overall, 32% had high risk or susceptible HLA genotypes. The modeled average age at diagnosis by age at introduction of each food and beverage grouping from the full model is presented in . Timing of introduction of the majority of foods and beverages were not associated with age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. The exception was introduction of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) (excluding juice) in the first 12 months of life which was associated with a 5-month earlier age at diagnosis (p=0.02), independent of a HLA risk status. displays the mean age at diagnosis by timing of complementary food introduction, according to HLA risk. Among those with a high risk/susceptible HLA, introduction of fruit juice in the first year of life was associated with a younger age at diagnosis compared with those not introduced (p=0.04).

DISCUSSION

In this large, diverse cohort of youth with type 1 diabetes, most dietary exposures were not associated with an earlier age at diagnosis with the exception of SSB consumption in the first year of life. Among those with high risk/susceptible HLA genotype, introduction of fruit juice in the first 12 months of life was associated with a younger age at diagnosis, suggesting that early exposure to SSBs may accelerate the onset of type 1 diabetes, independent of HLA-risk status and early exposure to juice may speed onset among youth who are genetically predisposed to type 1 diabetes. Biologic plausibility of our results are offered “overload hypothesis” (4), which suggests that environmental exposures may overstimulate beta cells, thus accelerating their autoimmune-mediated destruction. Increased insulin demand due to chronic exposure to high sugar intake and SSBs consumption has been reported in children (8), though no studies that we are aware of have assessed their role in the infant diet in a type 1 diabetes cohort. A high intake of carbohydrates, especially sucrose and disaccharides the year before diabetes diagnosis has been associated with increased type 1 diabetes risk, independent of total energy intake (9). The major limitation of our study is the reliance on maternal recall 11.3 ± 4.2 years prior, however the validity of surrogate recall of food groups up to 43 years prior has been reported to be acceptable in the Fels Longitudinal Study(10).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from our observational study suggests that introduction of SSB in the first year of life may accelerate onset of type 1 diabetes, independent of HLA-risk status and among youth with susceptible HLA genotypes, early introduction of juice may speed onset.
Table 1

Mean age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes by timing of introduction of complementary foods into the infant diet on a regular basis (at least once per week).

Predicted mean age at diagnosis (years) ± SE (N=1,077)
Age at introduction (months)<3m3-6m7-11m12m or moreP-value
Any solid food 9.41 ± 0.159.42 ± 0.089.38 ± 0.140.95
Vegetables excluding potatoes 9.50 ± 0.089.31 ± 0.19.31 ± 0.180.08
Cereal 9.39 ± 0.169.4 ± 0.089.32 ± 0.139.74 ± 0.220.38
Gluten 9.43 ± 0.239.45 ± 0.099.36 ± 0.099.49 ± 0.140.73
Fruit excluding juice 9.46 ± 0.089.34 ± 0.19.27 ± 0.160.29
Potatoes and rice 9.36 ± 0.179.43 ± 0.089.43 ± 0.139.38 ± 0.210.96
Meat including fish 9.42 ± 0.119.39 ± 0.099.47 ± 0.110.74
All dairy including formula 9.45 ± 0.099.41 ± 0.119.29 ± 0.119.49 ± 0.120.42
Dairy excluding formula 9.44 ± 0.119.42 ± 0.099.42 ± 0.090.97
Fruit juice 9.43 ± 0.099.32 ± 0.19.49 ± 0.110.29
Sweetened beverage excluding juice 9.04 ± 0.189.45 ± 0.080.02

Least-squares predicted means from model adjusted for sex, race, education, income, birth year, breastfeeding (never, 1-5m vs. ≥6m), HLA risk status (low risk/protective vs. high risk/susceptible) and in utero maternal DM exposure.

Note: cell size less than 30 were collapsed with the adjoining cell to improve precision.

Table 2

Model-estimated mean age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for windows of introduction of complementary foods, for youth with moderate and high HLA risk genotypes.

Low Risk/Protective HLA (estimated mean age at diagnosis ± SE) (N=684)High Risk/ Susceptible HLA (estimated mean age at diagnosis ± SE) (N=316)
Age at introduction (months)<3m3-6m7-11m≥ 12mp-value<3m3-6m7-11m≥ 12mp-valueOverall P for interaction[]
Any solid food 9.40 ± 0.179.45 ± 0.089.40 ± 0.160.99.44 ± 0.259.33 ± 0.119.32 ± 0.210.90.86
Vegetables excluding potatoes 9.55 ± 0.099.30 ± 0.119.30 ± 0.20.059.39 ± 0.129.33 ± 0.159.35 ± 0.340.90.6
Cereal 9.33 ± 0.189.43 ± 0.089.37 ± 0.159.77 ± 0.260.59.54 ± 0.289.31 ± 0.119.21 ± 0.219.67 ± 0.380.60.8
Fruit excluding juice 9.51 ± 0.099.34 ± 0.119.26 ± 0.180.39.33 ± 0.129.35 ± 0.159.36 ± 0.320.70.5
Gluten 9.58 ± 0.279.53 ± 0.19.34 ± 0.19.51 ± 0.160.29.07 ± 0.439.29 ± 0.139.42 ± 0.149.45 ± 0.241.00.3
Potatoes and rice 9.28 ± 0.199.47 ± 0.099.5 ± 0.159.34 ± 0.230.79.57 ± 0.39.34 ± 0.119.27 ± 0.219.59 ± 0.450.80.5
Meat including fish 9.48 ± 0.129.45 ± 0.099.40 ± 0.120.99.26 ± 0.179.27 ± 0.129.66 ± 0.170.090.1
All dairy including formula 9.47 ± 0.19.52 ± 0.129.3 ± 0.139.44 ± 0.140.49.39 ± 0.159.12 ± 0.189.26 ± 0.179.52 ± 0.180.30.3
Dairy excluding formula 9.50 ± 0.129.47 ± 0.19.41 ± 0.10.89.29 ± 0.199.3 ± 0.139.41 ± 0.130.70.6
Fruit juice 9.47 ± 0.19.39 ± 0.119.39 ± 0.130.79.3 ± 0.139.13 ± 0.169.63 ± 0.160.040.09
Sweetened bvg excluding juice 9.15 ± 0.219.48 ± 0.080.18.74 ± 0.359.41 ± 0.110.060.4

Adjusted for sex, race, education, income, birth year, breastfeeding, HLA risk status and in utero maternal DM exposure

Heterogeneity of effect between age at diagnosis and age at introduction by HLA genotype category was tested in the model with an interaction term.

Note: cell size less than 30 were collapsed with the adjoining cell to improve precision.

  10 in total

Review 1.  Can we slow the rising incidence of childhood-onset autoimmune diabetes? The overload hypothesis.

Authors:  G Dahlquist
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  The burden of diabetes mellitus among US youth: prevalence estimates from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.

Authors:  Angela D Liese; Ralph B D'Agostino; Richard F Hamman; Patrick D Kilgo; Jean M Lawrence; Lenna L Liu; Beth Loots; Barbara Linder; Santica Marcovina; Beatriz Rodriguez; Debra Standiford; Desmond E Williams
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Infant exposures and development of type 1 diabetes mellitus: The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY).

Authors:  Brittni Frederiksen; Miranda Kroehl; Molly M Lamb; Jennifer Seifert; Katherine Barriga; George S Eisenbarth; Marian Rewers; Jill M Norris
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  The relation of sugar intake to beta cell function in overweight Latino children.

Authors:  Jaimie N Davis; Emily E Ventura; Marc J Weigensberg; Geoff D C Ball; Martha L Cruz; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Michael I Goran
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Diet, growth, and the risk for type 1 diabetes in childhood: a matched case-referent study.

Authors:  Auste Pundziute-Lyckå; Lars-Ake Persson; Gunilla Cedermark; Agneta Jansson-Roth; Ulla Nilsson; Vera Westin; Gisela Dahlquist
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Autoantibody appearance and risk for development of childhood diabetes in offspring of parents with type 1 diabetes: the 2-year analysis of the German BABYDIAB Study.

Authors:  A G Ziegler; M Hummel; M Schenker; E Bonifacio
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 7.  Nutritional risk predictors of beta cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes at a young age.

Authors:  Suvi M Virtanen; Mikael Knip
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth: a multicenter study of the prevalence, incidence and classification of diabetes mellitus in youth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-10

9.  Validity of maternal recall of preschool diet after 43 years.

Authors:  Jorge E Chavarro; Karin B Michels; Sheherazadh Isaq; Bernard A Rosner; Laura Sampson; Carol Willey; Paula Tocco; Walter C Willett; William Cameron Chumlea
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  HLA DR-DQ haplotypes and genotypes and type 1 diabetes risk: analysis of the type 1 diabetes genetics consortium families.

Authors:  Henry Erlich; Ana Maria Valdes; Janelle Noble; Joyce A Carlson; Mike Varney; Pat Concannon; Josyf C Mychaleckyj; John A Todd; Persia Bonella; Anna Lisa Fear; Eva Lavant; Anthony Louey; Priscilla Moonsamy
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 9.461

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Current concepts on the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes--considerations for attempts to prevent and reverse the disease.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Matthias von Herrath; Alvin C Powers; Michael Clare-Salzler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Sugar intake is associated with progression from islet autoimmunity to type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young.

Authors:  Molly M Lamb; Brittni Frederiksen; Jennifer A Seifert; Miranda Kroehl; Marian Rewers; Jill M Norris
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  Infant Feeding and Timing of Complementary Foods in the Development of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Anita M Nucci; Suvi M Virtanen; Dorothy J Becker
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Twenty years of pediatric diabetes surveillance: what do we know and why it matters.

Authors:  Dana Dabelea; Katherine A Sauder; Elizabeth T Jensen; Amy K Mottl; Alyssa Huang; Catherine Pihoker; Richard F Hamman; Jean Lawrence; Lawrence M Dolan; Ralph D' Agostino; Lynne Wagenknecht; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Santica M Marcovina
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.499

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.