Literature DB >> 25117969

Plerixafor is effective given either preemptively or as a rescue strategy in poor stem cell mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma.

Jian Cheng1, Michael Schmitt, Patrick Wuchter, Eike C Buss, Mathias Witzens-Harig, Kai Neben, Michael Hundemer, Jens Hillengass, Renate Alexi, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Bao-an Chen, Anthony D Ho, Anita Schmitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Harvest of more than one CD34+ stem cell transplant has become the standard, to ensure the option for a second autologous transplantation in patients with relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma (MM). Additional administration of the CXCR-4 inhibitor plerixafor has been shown to increase the efficiency of CD34+ stem cell harvest. However, the algorithm when to apply plerixafor is still under debate. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 46 MM patients were categorized into four groups according to their CD34+ stem cell count in peripheral blood (PB) and mobilization with or without plerixafor: Group A comprised poor mobilizers with CD34+ cell counts of fewer than 20 × 10(6) /L in PB. Group B included inadequate mobilizers with CD34+ cell counts of 20 × 10(6) /L or more in PB and a low CD34+ stem cell yield in the first leukapheresis session. Patients receiving plerixafor preemptively (Group A1) and as a rescue strategy (Group B1) were compared to patients continuing stem cell collection with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor alone (Groups A2 and B2).
RESULTS: In both, the preemptive and the rescue settings, plerixafor enhanced the CD34+ stem cell yield significantly. Poor mobilization and administration of plerixafor was not associated with delayed engraftment.
CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that administration of plerixafor is safe and effective and facilitates a significantly higher CD34+ stem cell harvest. Based on the presented data, we propose an algorithm for the use of plerixafor for CD34+ stem cell mobilization and harvesting in poor mobilizing myeloma patients.
© 2014 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25117969     DOI: 10.1111/trf.12813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  8 in total

1.  Successful mobilization of PBSCs predicts favorable outcomes in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents and autologous transplantation.

Authors:  A Brioli; G Perrone; F Patriarca; A Pezzi; F Nobile; F Ballerini; M R Motta; S Ronconi; P Tacchetti; L Catalano; B A Zannetti; S Rizzi; S Volpe; E Zamagni; A M Liberati; K Mancuso; M Boccadoro; F E Davies; G J Morgan; A Palumbo; M Cavo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Plerixafor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients in Ontario.

Authors:  C T Kouroukis; N P Varela; C Bredeson; J Kuruvilla; A Xenocostas
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Single Dose Preemptive Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization for ASCT After Lenalidomide Based Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Impact in Resource Limited Setting.

Authors:  Rajiv Kumar; Rajan Kapoor; Bhushan Asthana; Jasjit Singh; Tarun Verma; Rajesh Chilaka; N K Singh; Ajay Sharma; S Das; Velu Nair
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Platelet Count before Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Is Associated with the Need for Plerixafor But Not with the Collection Result.

Authors:  Marc-Andrea Baertsch; Katharina Kriegsmann; Petra Pavel; Thomas Bruckner; Michael Hundemer; Mark Kriegsmann; Anthony D Ho; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Patrick Wuchter
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  A single center's experience using four different front line mobilization strategies in lymphoma patients planned to undergo autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  B M Haverkos; Y Huang; P Elder; L O'Donnell; D Scholl; B Whittaker; S Vasu; S Penza; L A Andritsos; S M Devine; S M Jaglowski
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  The Biological and Clinical Relevance of G Protein-Coupled Receptors to the Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematized Review.

Authors:  Hadrien Golay; Simona Jurkovic Mlakar; Vid Mlakar; Tiago Nava; Marc Ansari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Closer to Nature: The Role of MSCs in Recreating the Microenvironment of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Niche in vitro.

Authors:  Patrick Wuchter; Anke Diehlmann; Harald Klüter
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.040

8.  Dynamic cellular phynotyping defines specific mobilization mechanisms of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells induced by SDF1α versus synthetic agents.

Authors:  Cornelia Monzel; Alexandra S Becker; Rainer Saffrich; Patrick Wuchter; Volker Eckstein; Anthony D Ho; Motomu Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.