OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether tumoral (111)In-ibritumomab accumulation on pre-treatment imaging correlates with therapeutic responses and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing (90)Y-ibritumomab radioimmunotherapy (RIT). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 39 patients with low-grade B-cell NHL treated with RIT. We classified the patients into positive and negative groups according to the presence or absence of tumoral (111)In-ibritumomab accumulation on pre-treatment (111)In-ibritumomab examinations. We then determined the correlation between the (111)In-ibritumomab imaging findings and the patients' therapeutic responses and PFS. RESULTS: Tumoral (111)In-ibritumomab accumulation was positive in 64.1% and negative in 35.9% of the patients. The (111)In-positive patients had a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to the (111)In-negative patients (100.0% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.02). The (111)In-negative patients with advanced disease (stages III/IV) had a significantly lower ORR (40%) and a significantly higher rate of progressive disease (40.0%) compared to those of the (111)In-negative patients with limited disease (stages I/II) (100% and 0%, p = 0.009 each). However, these two groups had similar 2-year PFS rates (65.0% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: (111)In-ibritumomab imaging findings seem to correlate with ORR and the progressive disease rate after RIT, but not with PFS. KEY POINTS: All 39 NHL patients had tumoral accumulation on pretreatment FDG-PET/CT. 64.1% of NHL patients had tumoral accumulation on a pretreatment (111) In-ibritumomab examination. (90) Y-ibritumomab RIT resulted in high overall response and complete remission rates. (111) In-ibritumomab avidity of lymphoma lesions could predict a strong therapeutic effect. (111) In-ibritumomab imaging findings did not correlate with progression-free survival.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether tumoral (111)In-ibritumomab accumulation on pre-treatment imaging correlates with therapeutic responses and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) undergoing (90)Y-ibritumomab radioimmunotherapy (RIT). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 39 patients with low-grade B-cell NHL treated with RIT. We classified the patients into positive and negative groups according to the presence or absence of tumoral (111)In-ibritumomab accumulation on pre-treatment (111)In-ibritumomab examinations. We then determined the correlation between the (111)In-ibritumomab imaging findings and the patients' therapeutic responses and PFS. RESULTS:Tumoral (111)In-ibritumomab accumulation was positive in 64.1% and negative in 35.9% of the patients. The (111)In-positive patients had a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to the (111)In-negative patients (100.0% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.02). The (111)In-negative patients with advanced disease (stages III/IV) had a significantly lower ORR (40%) and a significantly higher rate of progressive disease (40.0%) compared to those of the (111)In-negative patients with limited disease (stages I/II) (100% and 0%, p = 0.009 each). However, these two groups had similar 2-year PFS rates (65.0% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: (111)In-ibritumomab imaging findings seem to correlate with ORR and the progressive disease rate after RIT, but not with PFS. KEY POINTS: All 39 NHLpatients had tumoral accumulation on pretreatment FDG-PET/CT. 64.1% of NHLpatients had tumoral accumulation on a pretreatment (111) In-ibritumomab examination. (90) Y-ibritumomab RIT resulted in high overall response and complete remission rates. (111) In-ibritumomab avidity of lymphoma lesions could predict a strong therapeutic effect. (111) In-ibritumomab imaging findings did not correlate with progression-free survival.
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E Lopci; I Santi; E Derenzini; C Fonti; G Savelli; F Bertagna; M Bellò; B Botto; D Huglo; F Morschhauser; P Zinzani; S Fanti Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Thomas E Witzig; Arturo Molina; Leo I Gordon; Christos Emmanouilides; Russell J Schilder; Ian W Flinn; Mohamed Darif; Roger Macklis; Katie Vo; Gregory A Wiseman Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Thomas E Witzig; Leo I Gordon; Fernando Cabanillas; Myron S Czuczman; Christos Emmanouilides; Robin Joyce; Brad L Pohlman; Nancy L Bartlett; Gregory A Wiseman; Norman Padre; Antonio J Grillo-López; Pratik Multani; Christine A White Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544