Literature DB >> 25117728

The arthroscopic latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: 5-year minimum follow-up.

Guillaume D Dumont1, Simon Fogerty2, Claudio Rosso3, Laurent Lafosse4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure combines the benefits of arthroscopic surgery with the low rate of recurrent instability associated with the Latarjet procedure. Only short-term outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure have been reported.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of recurrent instability and patient outcomes a minimum of 5 years after stabilization performed with the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Patients who underwent the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure before June 2008 completed a questionnaire to determine whether they had experienced a dislocation, subluxation, or further surgery. The patients also completed the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI).
RESULTS: A total of 62 of 87 patients (64/89 shoulders) were contacted for follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 76.4 months (range, 61.2-100.7 months). No patients had reported a dislocation since their surgery. One patient reported having subluxations since the surgery. Thus, 1 patient (1.59%) had recurrent instability after the procedure. The mean ± standard deviation aggregate WOSI score was 90.6% ± 9.4%. Mean WOSI domain scores were as follows: Physical Symptoms, 90.1% ± 8.7%; Sports/Recreation/Work, 90.3% ± 12.9%; Lifestyle, 93.7% ± 9.8%; and Emotions, 88.7% ± 17.3%.
CONCLUSION: The rate of recurrent instability after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure is low in this series of patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patient outcomes as measured by the WOSI are good.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bankart; Latarjet; arthroscopic Latarjet procedure; shoulder dislocation; shoulder instability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25117728     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514544682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  49 in total

Review 1.  Open Latarjet versus arthroscopic Latarjet: clinical results and cost analysis.

Authors:  P Randelli; C Fossati; C Stoppani; F R Evola; L De Girolamo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Lateral Decubitus All-Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure for Treatment of Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Matthew R Lewington; Nathan Urquhart; Ivan H Wong
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-05-11

3.  Biomechanical comparison of the Latarjet procedure with and without a coracoid bone block.

Authors:  W Barrett Payne; Matthew T Kleiner; Michelle H McGarry; James E Tibone; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Complications of the Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Ashish Gupta; Ruth Delaney; Kalojan Petkin; Laurent Lafosse
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

5.  The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: effective and safe.

Authors:  Zhenming He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

6.  Latarjet procedure using subscapularis split approach offers better rotational endurance than partial tenotomy for anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Fevzi Birisik; Hakan Ozben; Ata Can Atalar; Turker Sahinkaya; Aksel Seyahi; Mehmet Demirhan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Arthroscopic Bankart repair associated with subscapularis augmentation (ASA) versus open Latarjet to treat recurrent anterior shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone loss: clinical comparison of two series.

Authors:  R Russo; G Della Rotonda; F Cautiero; M Ciccarelli; M Maiotti; C Massoni; F Di Pietto; M Zappia
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 8.  Contraindications and complications of the Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Peter Domos; Enricomaria Lunini; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-09-11

9.  Arthroscopic double bone block augmentation is a salvage procedure for anterior and posterior shoulder instability secondary to glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  David Haeni; Matthieu Sanchez; Plath Johannes; Lilling Victoria; Dan Henderson; Jeremy Munji; Kalojan Petkin; Laurent Lafosse
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Arthroscopic treatment of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Ettore Taverna; Guido Garavaglia; Henri Ufenast; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.