Literature DB >> 25116624

Determining sensitive stages for learning to detect predators in larval bronzed frogs: importance of alarm cues in learning.

Anuradha Batabyal1, Sachin M Gosavi, Narahari P Gramapurohit.   

Abstract

Successful survival and reproduction of prey organisms depend on their ability to detect their potential predators accurately and respond effectively with suitable defences. Predator detection can be innate or can be acquired through learning.We studied prey-predator interactions in the larval bronzed frogs (Sylvirana temporalis), which have the innate ability to detect certain predators. We conducted a series of experiments to determine if the larval S. temporalis rely solely on innate predator detection mechanisms or can also learn to use more specific cues such as conspecific alarm cues for the purpose. The results of our study clearly indicate that larval S. temporalis use both innate and learned mechanisms for predator detection. Predator-naive tadpoles could detect kairomones alone as a potential threat and responded by reducing activity, suggesting an innate predator detection mechanism. Surprisingly, predator-naive tadpoles failed to detect conspecific alarm cues as a potential threat, but learned to do so through experience. After acquiring the ability to detect conspecific alarm cues, they could associate novel predator cues with conspecific alarm cues. Further, post feeding stages of larval S. temporalis are sensitive for learning to detect conspecific alarm cues to label novel predators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25116624     DOI: 10.1007/s12038-014-9455-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences.

Authors:  Nancy M Schoeppner; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Behavioural responses of Mallorcan midwife toad tadpoles to natural and unnatural snake predators

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Importance of predator diet cues in responses of larval wood frogs to fish and invertebrate predators.

Authors:  D P Chivers; R S Mirza
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The scent of danger: arginine as an olfactory cue of reduced predation risk.

Authors:  Ryan P Ferrer; Richard K Zimmer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Learning by embryos and the ghost of predation future.

Authors:  Alicia Mathis; Maud C O Ferrari; Nathan Windel; François Messier; Douglas P Chivers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Avoidance response of a terrestrial salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) to chemical alarm cues.

Authors:  D P Chivers; J M Kiesecker; M T Anderson; E L Wildy; A R Blaustein
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.626

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Inducible defenses in Olympia oysters in response to an invasive predator.

Authors:  Jillian M Bible; Kaylee R Griffith; Eric Sanford
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Can embryonic skipper frogs (Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis) learn to recognise kairomones in the absence of a nervous system?

Authors:  Swapnil C Supekar; Narahari P Gramapurohit
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Naive poison frog tadpoles use bi-modal cues to avoid insect predators but not heterospecific predatory tadpoles.

Authors:  Birgit Szabo; Rosanna Mangione; Matthias Rath; Andrius Pašukonis; Stephan A Reber; Jinook Oh; Max Ringler; Eva Ringler
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.312

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.