Literature DB >> 25116294

Quality of dying in the ICU: is it worse for patients admitted from the hospital ward compared to those admitted from the emergency department?

Ann C Long1, Erin K Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Lois Downey, Elizabeth L Nielsen, Anthony L Back, J Randall Curtis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although most intensive care unit (ICU) admissions originate in the emergency department (ED), a substantial number of admissions arrive from hospital wards. Patients transferred from the hospital ward often share clinical characteristics with those admitted from the ED, but family expectations may differ. An understanding of the impact of ICU admission source on family perceptions of end-of-life care may help improve patient and family outcomes by identifying those at risk for poor outcomes. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This was a cohort study of patients with chronic illness and acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation who died after admission to an ICU in any of the 14 participating hospitals in the Seattle-Tacoma area between 2003 and 2008 (n = 1,500). MEASUREMENTS: Using regression models adjusted for hospital site and patient-, nurse- and family-level characteristics, we examined associations between ICU admission source (hospital ward vs. ED) and (1) family ratings of satisfaction with ICU care; (2) family and nurse ratings of quality of dying; (3) chart-based indicators of palliative care. MAIN
RESULTS: Admission from the hospital ward was associated with lower family ratings of quality of dying [β -0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.54, -0.26, p = 0.006] and satisfaction (total score β -3.97, 95% CI -7.89, -0.05, p = 0.047; satisfaction with care domain score β -5.40, 95% CI -9.44, -1.36, p = 0.009). Nurses did not report differences in quality of dying. Patients from hospital wards were less likely to have family conferences [odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95% CI 0.52, 0.88, p = 0.004] or discussion of prognosis in the first 72 h after ICU admission (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56, 0.91, p = 0.007) but were more likely to receive spiritual care (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.14, 1.93, p = 0.003) or have life support withdrawn (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04, 1.82, p = 0.025).
CONCLUSION: Admission from the hospital ward is associated with family perceptions of a lower quality of dying and less satisfaction with ICU care. Differences in receipt of palliative care suggest that family of patients from the hospital ward receive less communication. Nurse ratings of quality of dying did not significantly differ by ICU admission source, suggesting dissimilarities between family and nurse perspectives. This study identifies a patient population at risk for poor quality palliative and end-of-life care. Future studies are needed to identify interventions to improve care for patients who deteriorate on the wards following hospital admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25116294      PMCID: PMC4350659          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3425-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  35 in total

1.  Critical care delivery in the United States: distribution of services and compliance with Leapfrog recommendations.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Andrew F Shorr; Alan White; Tony T Dremsizov; Robert J Schmitz; Mark A Kelley
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey.

Authors:  Richard J Wall; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; Daren K Heyland; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Are regional variations in end-of-life care intensity explained by patient preferences?: A Study of the US Medicare Population.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; M Brooke Herndon; Denise L Anthony; Patricia M Gallagher; Jonathan S Skinner; Julie P W Bynum; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: a consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Workgroup.

Authors:  Richard A Mularski; J Randall Curtis; J Andrew Billings; Robert Burt; Ira Byock; Cathy Fuhrman; Anne C Mosenthal; Justine Medina; Daniel E Ray; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Lawrence J Schneiderman; Patsy D Treece; Robert D Truog; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Frédéric Pochard; Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Sylvie Chevret; Jérôme Aboab; Christophe Adrie; Djilali Annane; Gérard Bleichner; Pierre Edouard Bollaert; Michael Darmon; Thomas Fassier; Richard Galliot; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas; Cyril Goulenok; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Jan Hayon; Mercé Jourdain; Michel Kaidomar; Christian Laplace; Jérôme Larché; Jérôme Liotier; Laurent Papazian; Catherine Poisson; Jean Reignier; Fayçal Saidi; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Admission to intensive care unit at the end-of-life: is it an informed decision?

Authors:  Mohamed Y Rady; Daniel J Johnson
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen M Detering; Andrew D Hancock; Michael C Reade; William Silvester
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

8.  Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Vig; Helene Starks; Janelle S Taylor; Elizabeth K Hopley; Kelly Fryer-Edwards
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Using the medical record to evaluate the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Bradford J Glavan; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.

Authors:  Rahim Moineddin; Flora I Matheson; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  10 in total

1.  The importance and challenge of measuring family experience with end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Lois Downey; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Respective impact of no escalation of treatment, withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment on ICU patients' prognosis: a multicenter study of the Outcomerea Research Group.

Authors:  Alexandre Lautrette; Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas; Pierre-Marie Bertrand; Dany Goldgran-Toledano; Samir Jamali; Virginie Laurent; Laurent Argaud; Carole Schwebel; Bruno Mourvillier; Michaël Darmon; Stéphane Ruckly; Anne-Sylvie Dumenil; Virginie Lemiale; Bertrand Souweine; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Intensive care unit length of stay is reduced by protocolized family support intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Lee; Yeonkyung Park; Eun Jin Jang; Yeon Joo Lee
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Tell me where the patient comes from.

Authors:  Rene Robert; Leif Saager
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Quality of dying in the intensive care unit: it's a matter of time.

Authors:  Alex H Gifford; Antonio M Esquinas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Quality of dying in the ICU: understanding ways to make it better.

Authors:  Ann C Long; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Unplanned Admission to the ICU: A Qualitative Study Examining Family Member Experiences.

Authors:  Ann L Jennerich; Mara R Hobler; Rashmi K Sharma; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 8.  Involvement of ICU families in decisions: fine-tuning the partnership.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Marine Chaize; Nancy Kentish-Barnes
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Quality of Dying in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: Comparison between Thai Buddhists and Thai Muslims.

Authors:  Veerapong Vattanavanit; Supattra Uppanisakorn; Rungsun Bhurayanontachai; Bodin Khwannimit
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-06

10.  Assessment of Variability in End-of-Life Care Delivery in Intensive Care Units in the United States.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Kruser; David A Aaby; David G Stevenson; Brenda T Pun; Michele C Balas; Mary Ann Barnes-Daly; Lori Harmon; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.