Menno D de Jong1, Michael G Ison2, Arnold S Monto3, Hristo Metev4, Carol Clark5, Brian O'Neil6, Jenna Elder7, Amy McCullough8, Phil Collis8, William P Sheridan8. 1. Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Division of Infectious Disease and Organ Transplantation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 3. School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Pneumology Department, SHATPPD-Ruse, Ruse, Bulgaria. 5. Emergency Medicine Observation Unit, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University-Detroit Medical Center, Michigan. 7. PharPoint Research, Wilmington. 8. BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Seasonal influenza causes >200 000annual hospitalizations in the United States. Current antiviral treatment options are limited to oral or inhaled agents. There is an urgent unmet need for intravenous antiviral treatments. METHODS:Patients hospitalized with suspected influenza were randomized to 5-day treatment with intravenous peramivir (600 mg once daily) or placebo; all received the institution's standard of care (SOC) treatment. Time to clinical resolution and change in viral shedding in nasopharyngeal specimens were the primary and key secondary end points. RESULTS:Influenza infection was confirmed in 338 of 405 enrolled patients. At the time of a preplanned interim analysis, the primary efficacy analysis population comprised 121 patients who did not receive a concurrent neuraminidase inhibitor as part of the SOC. The median (95% confidence interval) time to clinical resolution was 42.5 (34.0-57.9) hours for peramivir versus 49.5 (40.0-61.9) hours for placebo (P = .97). A larger treatment effect was observed in patients with history of symptoms <48 hours or admitted to an intensive care unit. Greater reductions in viral shedding, based on median tissue culture infective dose, were observed in patients who received peramivir than in placebo recipients, although this difference was not statistically significant. The incidence and severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The study was terminated for futility after a preplanned interim analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A significant clinical benefit was not demonstrated for peramivir plus SOC compared with placebo plus SOC. Peramivir was generally safe and well tolerated. These findings highlight the challenges in designing studies to evaluate influenza antiviral agents in a hospitalized setting. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00958776.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza causes >200 000 annual hospitalizations in the United States. Current antiviral treatment options are limited to oral or inhaled agents. There is an urgent unmet need for intravenous antiviral treatments. METHODS:Patients hospitalized with suspected influenza were randomized to 5-day treatment with intravenous peramivir (600 mg once daily) or placebo; all received the institution's standard of care (SOC) treatment. Time to clinical resolution and change in viral shedding in nasopharyngeal specimens were the primary and key secondary end points. RESULTS: Influenza infection was confirmed in 338 of 405 enrolled patients. At the time of a preplanned interim analysis, the primary efficacy analysis population comprised 121 patients who did not receive a concurrent neuraminidase inhibitor as part of the SOC. The median (95% confidence interval) time to clinical resolution was 42.5 (34.0-57.9) hours for peramivir versus 49.5 (40.0-61.9) hours for placebo (P = .97). A larger treatment effect was observed in patients with history of symptoms <48 hours or admitted to an intensive care unit. Greater reductions in viral shedding, based on median tissue culture infective dose, were observed in patients who received peramivir than in placebo recipients, although this difference was not statistically significant. The incidence and severity of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The study was terminated for futility after a preplanned interim analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A significant clinical benefit was not demonstrated for peramivir plus SOC compared with placebo plus SOC. Peramivir was generally safe and well tolerated. These findings highlight the challenges in designing studies to evaluate influenza antiviral agents in a hospitalized setting. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00958776.
Authors: Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman Journal: BMJ Date: 2020-06-17
Authors: Timothy M Uyeki; Henry H Bernstein; John S Bradley; Janet A Englund; Thomas M File; Alicia M Fry; Stefan Gravenstein; Frederick G Hayden; Scott A Harper; Jon Mark Hirshon; Michael G Ison; B Lynn Johnston; Shandra L Knight; Allison McGeer; Laura E Riley; Cameron R Wolfe; Paul E Alexander; Andrew T Pavia Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: John H Beigel; Hannah H Nam; Peter L Adams; Amy Krafft; William L Ince; Samer S El-Kamary; Amy C Sims Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Jennifer L McKimm-Breschkin; Shibo Jiang; David S Hui; John H Beigel; Elena A Govorkova; Nelson Lee Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: James C King; John H Beigel; Michael G Ison; Richard E Rothman; Timothy M Uyeki; Robert E Walker; James D Neaton; John S Tegeris; James A Zhou; Kimberly L Armstrong; Wendy Carter; Peter S Miele; Melissa S Willis; Andrea F Dugas; LaRee A Tracy; David M Vock; Rick A Bright Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Ross L Peterson; David M Vock; John H Powers; Sean Emery; Eduardo Fernandez Cruz; Sally Hunsberger; Mamta K Jain; Sarah Pett; James D Neaton Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Munyaradzi Dimairo; Philip Pallmann; James Wason; Susan Todd; Thomas Jaki; Steven A Julious; Adrian P Mander; Christopher J Weir; Franz Koenig; Marc K Walton; Jon P Nicholl; Elizabeth Coates; Katie Biggs; Toshimitsu Hamasaki; Michael A Proschan; John A Scott; Yuki Ando; Daniel Hind; Douglas G Altman Journal: Trials Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 2.279