| Literature DB >> 25115364 |
Terry Ann Glauser1, Justin Barnes1, Holder Nevins1, Wendy Cerenzia2.
Abstract
The objective is to identify practice patterns and attitudes of and barriers faced by US physicians assessing thromboembolism/stroke risk and managing anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation (AF) to determine educational needs. Case-based surveys were used to assess practice patterns, guideline use, barriers, and attitudes; 51 cardiologists and 50 primary care physicians (PCPs) were surveyed. Most cardiologists use validated risk scoring systems to assess thromboembolism/stroke risk, and more than half of PCPs use clinical experience. Assessment of bleeding risk varied; more than half of respondents rely on clinical judgment or patient bleeding history. The most commonly used prophylactic agents are warfarin/another vitamin K antagonist (PCPs) or antiplatelet agents (cardiologists). Newer anticoagulants are used less frequently. Bleeding risk, need for frequent monitoring (vitamin K antagonists), and medication costs were the most significant barriers. Cardiologists and PCPs could benefit from education on validated scoring systems to assess risk of thromboembolism/stroke and bleeding in AF, on newly released AF guidelines, and on newer anticoagulants.Entities:
Keywords: anticoagulation therapy; atrial fibrillation; physician education; practice gaps; stroke; thromboembolism; warfarin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25115364 DOI: 10.1177/1062860614547363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Med Qual ISSN: 1062-8606 Impact factor: 1.852