Literature DB >> 25114885

Rationale and surgical technique of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy using endoscopic staples.

Beom Hui Lee1, Sung-Su Yun1, Man Ki Kim1, Hwa-Kyung Jung1, Dong-Shik Lee1, Hong-Jin Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) has been widely accepted due to benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Some surgeons prefer to isolate glissonian pedicles to segments II and III and to control individual pedicles with surgical clips, whereas opt like to control glissonian pedicles simultaneously using endoscopic stapling devices. The aim of this study was to find the rationale of LLLS using endoscopic staples.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes (operation time, drainage length, transfusion, hospital stay, and complication rate) of 35 patients that underwent LLLS between April 2004 and February 2012. Patients were dichotomized by surgical technique based on whether glissonian pedicles were isolated and controlled (the individual group, n = 21) or controlled using endoscopic staples at once (the batch group, n = 14).
RESULTS: Mean operation time was 265.3 ± 21.3 minutes (mean ± standard deviation) in the individual group and 170 ± 22.9 minutes in the batch group. Operation time in the batch group was significantly shorter than the individual group (P = 0.007). Mean drainage length was 4.8 ± 1.6 and 2.6 ± 1.5 days in the individual and the batch group. There was significantly shorter in the batch group, also (P = 0.006). No transfusion was required in the batch group, but 4 patients in the individual group needed transfusion. Mean hospital stay was 10.7 ± 1.1 and 9.4 ± 0.8 days in the individual and the batch groups (P = 0.460). There were no significant complications or mortality in both groups.
CONCLUSION: LLLS using endoscopic staples (batch group) was found to be an easier and safer technique without morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatectomy; Laparoscopy; Surgical staples

Year:  2014        PMID: 25114885      PMCID: PMC4127897          DOI: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.2.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res        ISSN: 2288-6575            Impact factor:   1.859


  19 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic liver resection--current update.

Authors:  Kevin Tri Nguyen; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy: surgical technique and our results from Leeds.

Authors:  Aamir Z Khan; K Raj Prasad; J Peter A Lodge; Giles J Toogood
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.878

3.  Laparoscopic left lateral liver sectionectomy: a safe, efficient, reproducible technique.

Authors:  M Abu Hilal; N W Pearce
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care.

Authors:  Giulio Belli; Brice Gayet; Ho-Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Ki-Hun Kim; Robert Cannon; Hironori Kaneko; Thomas Gamblin; Alan Koffron; Ibrahim Dagher; Joseph F Buell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Validation of the laparoscopically stapled approach as a standard technique for left lateral segment liver resection.

Authors:  Xuedong Wang; Jianwei Li; Hongguang Wang; Ying Luo; Wenbin Ji; Weidong Duan; Xuan Zhang; Sen Guo; Kesen Xu; Jiahong Dong; Shuguo Zheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopy as a routine approach for left lateral sectionectomy.

Authors:  S Chang; A Laurent; C Tayar; M Karoui; D Cherqui
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Relationship between left biliary duct system and left portal vein: evaluation with three-dimensional portocholangiography.

Authors:  Akihiro Cho; Shinichi Okazumi; Youshin Yoshinaga; Yukika Ishikawa; Munemasa Ryu; Takenori Ochiai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Liver transplantation in children from living related donors. Surgical techniques and results.

Authors:  C E Broelsch; P F Whitington; J C Emond; T G Heffron; J R Thistlethwaite; L Stevens; J Piper; S H Whitington; J L Lichtor
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph F Buell; Daniel Cherqui; David A Geller; Nicholas O'Rourke; David Iannitti; Ibrahim Dagher; Alan J Koffron; Mark Thomas; Brice Gayet; Ho Seong Han; Go Wakabayashi; Giulio Belli; Hironori Kaneko; Chen-Guo Ker; Olivier Scatton; Alexis Laurent; Eddie K Abdalla; Prosanto Chaudhury; Erik Dutson; Clark Gamblin; Michael D'Angelica; David Nagorney; Giuliano Testa; Daniel Labow; Derrik Manas; Ronnie T Poon; Heidi Nelson; Robert Martin; Bryan Clary; Wright C Pinson; John Martinie; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Robert Goldstein; Sasan Roayaie; David Barlet; Joseph Espat; Michael Abecassis; Myrddin Rees; Yuman Fong; Kelly M McMasters; Christoph Broelsch; Ron Busuttil; Jacques Belghiti; Steven Strasberg; Ravi S Chari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Glissonean pedicle transection method for liver surgery (with video).

Authors:  Masakazu Yamamoto; Satoshi Katagiri; Shun-ichi Ariizumi; Yoshihito Kotera; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.027

View more
  1 in total

1.  Laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: my trials and current status in Korea.

Authors:  Sung Su Yun
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-06-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.