| Literature DB >> 25114806 |
Songtao Gao1, Yan Zheng2, Qiqing Cai1, Zhansheng Deng3, Weitao Yao1, Jiaqiang Wang1, Xin Wang1, Peng Zhang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of tissue engineering nerve on repair of rat sciatic nerve defect.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25114806 PMCID: PMC4120921 DOI: 10.1155/2014/139085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1(a) Immunocytochemical staining of GFAP in Schwann cells-like cells that differentiated from ADSCs. (b) Immunocytochemical staining of S-100 in Schwann cells-like cells that differentiated from ADSCs. (c) BrdU and S-100 staining of longitudinal nerve slices from group B at 6 w, blue BrdU-labeled Schwann cells-like cells' nucleus, and brown S100-labeled staining myelin sheath were observed under microscope. (d) BrdU and S-100 staining of longitudinal nerve slices from group B at 12 w, blue BrdU-labeled Schwann cells-like cells' nucleus, and brown S100-labeled staining myelin sheath were observed under microscope.
Comparison of SFI%, MNCV%, and CAMP% in 3 groups (, n = 15).
| SFI% | MNCV% | CAMP% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 w | 12 w | 6 w | 12 w | 6 w | 12 w | |
| Group A | 46.32 ± 5.13* | 72.73 ± 8.06* | 42.54 ± 6.33* | 69.34 ± 9.13* | 40.52 ± 4.15* | 68.24 ± 9.45 |
| Group B | 52.38 ± 7.12# | 79.99 ± 10.33# | 51.12 ± 8.15# | 75.93 ± 5.95# | 45.38 ± 4.12# | 75.98 ± 10.99 |
| Group C | 54.32 ± 5.24 | 83.12 ± 5.89 | 54.65 ± 7.42 | 79.75 ± 3.99 | 48.76 ± 6.76 | 79.43 ± 6.76 |
*Compared with groups B and C, P < 0.05; #compared with group C, P > 0.05.
Figure 2The footprint for sciatic nerve function index of rats.
Figure 3((a), (b), and (c)) Neural electrophysiology of group A (a), group B (b), and group C (c) at 6 weeks. ((d), (e), and (f)) Neural electrophysiology of group A (d), group B (e), and group C (f) at 12 weeks.
Figure 4((a), (b), and (c)) HE staining of transverse nerve slices from each group at 6 w. The regenerated myelinated nerve fibers were sparse; distribution and diameter of the fibers were irregular, but there were no obvious lymphocytic infiltrates. ((d), (e), and (f)) HE staining of transverse nerve slices from each group at 12 w. (d) The number of regenerated myelinated nerve fibers in group A was increased; myelin was relatively dense and irregularly arranged. The number of regenerated myelinated nerve fibers in groups B (e) and C (f) was increased; myelin was dense and regularly arranged; there were blood capillary hyperplasia and no obvious lymphocytic infiltrates. ((g), (h), and (i)) Toluidine blue staining slices from each group at 6 w. (g) The myelin of regenerated myelinated nerve fibers in group A was sparse; the morphology and diameter were irregular. The myelin of regenerated myelinated nerve fibers in groups B (h) and C (i) was dense, but the morphology and diameter were irregular. ((j), (k), and (l)) Toluidine blue staining slices from each group at 12 w. (j) There were large numbers of regenerative and partly myelinated axon in group A and the diameter of them was homogeneous. There were large numbers of regenerative and partly myelinated axon in groups B (k) and C (l) and the diameter of them was homogeneous and myelin sheath was more thicker than group A. ((m), (n), and (o)) Transmission electron microscope from each group at 6 w. (m) The arrangement and thickness of regenerated myelin sheath in group A were irregular. (n) The arrangement of regenerated myelin sheath in group B was more regular than group A, but the thickness of myelin sheath was nonuniform. (o) The arrangement of regenerated myelin sheath in group C was more regular than group A and the thickness of myelin sheath was uniform. ((p), (q), and (r)) Transmission electron microscope from each group at 12 w. (p) The regenerated myelin sheath was thin and irregular, accompanied with Schwann cell proliferation. (q) In group B, the regenerated myelin sheath arranges compactly and thicker, accompanied with Schwann cell proliferation. (r) In group C, the regenerated myelin sheath arranges compactly and thicker than groups A and B, accompanied with Schwann cell proliferation and chondriosome, microtubule, and microfilament inside.
Comparison of the recovery rate of wet weight of gastrocnemius muscle, regenerated myelinated nerve fibers number, nerve fiber diameter, and the thickness of the myelin sheath in 3 groups (, n = 15).
| Wet weight of gastrocnemius (%) | Nerve fibers number (%) | Nerve fiber diameter (%) | Thickness of the myelin sheath (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 w | 12 w | 6 w | 12 w | 6 w | 12 w | 6 w | 12 w | |
| Group A | 36.25 ± 4.22* | 62.31 ± 3.96* | 38.45 ± 6.28* | 67.89 ± 11.87* | 40.11 ± 4.32* | 76.37 ± 9.38* | 41.33 ± 4.58* | 77.62 ± 7.98* |
| Group B | 47.43 ± 6.43# | 79.03 ± 5.66# | 44.29 ± 7.52# | 77.06 ± 11.54# | 45.58 ± 4.87# | 83.23 ± 6.32# | 46.41 ± 4.35# | 83.96 ± 8.31# |
| Group C | 49.66 ± 6.48 | 80.43 ± 5.78 | 47.75 ± 5.98 | 81.25 ± 6.65 | 48.43 ± 5.76 | 87.87 ± 5.43 | 48.71 ± 6.65 | 87.56 ± 7.76 |
*Compared with groups B and C, P < 0.05; #compared with group C, P > 0.05.