| Literature DB >> 25114749 |
José M González-Ravé1, Daniel Juárez1, Jacobo A Rubio-Arias2, Vicente J Clemente-Suarez1, María A Martinez-Valencia1, Javier Abian-Vicen3.
Abstract
Isokinetic strength evaluation of the knee flexion and extension in concentric mode of contraction is an important part of the comprehensive evaluation of athletes. The aims of this study were to evaluate the isokinetic knee peak torque in both the extension and flexion movement in the dominant and non-dominant leg, and the relationship with jumping performance. Twelve elite male handball players from the top Spanish handball division voluntary participated in the study (age 27.68 ± 4.12 years; body mass 92.89 ± 12.34 kg; body height 1.90 ± 0.05 m). The knee extensor and flexor muscle peak torque of each leg were concentrically measured at 60º/s and 180º/s with an isokinetic dynamometer. The Squat Jump and Countermovement Jump were performed on a force platform to determine power and vertical jump height. Non-significant differences were observed between legs in the isokinetic knee extension (dominant= 2.91 ± 0.53 Nm/kg vs non-dominant = 2.70 ± 0.47 Nm/kg at 60º/s; dominant = 1.90 ± 0.31 Nm/kg vs non-dominant = 1.83 ± 0.29 Nm/kg at 180º/s) and flexion peak torques (dominant = 1.76 ± 0.29 Nm/kg vs non-dominant = 1.72 ± 0.39 Nm/kg at 60º/s; dominant = 1.30 ± 0.23 Nm/kg vs non-dominant = 1.27 ± 0.35 Nm/kg at 180º/s). Low and non-significant correlation coefficients were found between the isokinetic peak torques and vertical jumping performance (SJ = 31.21 ± 4.32 cm; CMJ = 35.89 ± 4.20 cm). Similar isokinetic strength was observed between the legs; therefore, no relationship was found between the isokinetic knee flexion and extension peak torques as well as vertical jumping performance in elite handball players.Entities:
Keywords: handball; isokinetic; jumping; peak torque; power
Year: 2014 PMID: 25114749 PMCID: PMC4120456 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Absolute (Nm) and relative (Nm/kg) isokinetic peak torques in leg muscles of elite male handball players.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 267.6 ± 46.4 | 2.91 ± 0.53 | 176.4 ± 29.6 | 1.90 ± 0.31 | 166.0 ± 44.4 | 1.76 ± 0.29 | 122.4 ± 33.9 | 1.30 ± 0.23 | |
|
| ||||||||
| 247.2 ± 27.4 | 2.70 ± 0.47 | 168.2 ± 16.9 | 1.83 ± 0.29 | 160.4 ± 41.1 | 1.72 ± 0.39 | 119.1 ± 38.2 | 1.27 ± 0.35 | |
|
| ||||||||
| 0.139 | 0.162 | 0.442 | 0.475 | 0.372 | 0.406 | 0.381 | 0.395 | |
Data are mean ± SD for 12 elite handball players.
| 2006.4 ± 362.3 | 2.31 ± 0.29 | 4073.5 ± 1279.7 | 47.18 ± 15.88 | 31.21 ± 4.32 | |
| 2348.1 ± 351.5 | 2.72 ± 0.45 | 4304.8 ± 1181.8 | 49.43 ± 15.96 | 35.89 ± 4.20 |
Data are mean ± SD for 12 elite handball players.
Pearson correlation coefficients between isokinetic peak torques and jumping variables.
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | 0.097 | 0.074 | −0.060 | 0.073 | |
| p | 0.789 | 0.838 | 0.868 | 0.840 | |
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | −0.123 | −0.111 | −0.326 | −0.136 | |
| p | 0.733 | 0.759 | 0.356 | 0.707 | |
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | −0.201 | −0.003 | −0.305 | −0.058 | |
| p | 0.576 | 0.991 | 0.391 | 0.871 | |
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | −0.154 | 0.088 | −0.250 | 0.047 | |
| p | 0.669 | 0.807 | 0.485 | 0.895 | |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | 0.150 | −0.526 | 0.321 | 0.027 | |
| p | 0.679 | 0.118 | 0.364 | 0.938 | |
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | 0.175 | −0.327 | 0.038 | −0.198 | |
| p | 0.628 | 0.354 | 0.916 | 0.581 | |
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | −0.359 | 0.124 | −0.341 | 0.103 | |
| p | 0.308 | 0.731 | 0.334 | 0.776 | |
|
| |||||
| Pearson Correlation | −0.433 | 0.184 | −0.309 | 0.229 | |
| p | 0.211 | 0.609 | 0.384 | 0.522 | |
SJ = Squat Jump, CMJ = Countermovement Jump.