| Literature DB >> 25114706 |
Fei Teng1, Guangxi Li1, Zhangjing Liu1, Liangdeng Zhang1, Kuiwu Yao1.
Abstract
The Xuefuzhuyu capsule (XFZY) is widely used for the treatment of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in China. We previously demonstrated that XFZY could reduce apoptosis in Sprague-Dawley rat cardiomyocytes with the similar effect of resveratrol (Res) Hori et al. (2013), although its molecular mechanism underlying this protective effect is still unclear. Silent information regulator of transcription 1 (SIRT1) had been demonstrated to be responsible for cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury via long-term transcriptionally regulatory mechanism Braunersreuther and Jaquet (2012). Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to test if XFZY might contribute to the protection of ischemic myocardial cells induced by ischemia through SIRT1-mediated signal transduction pathway by using electron micrograph, RT-PCR assay, and western-blot test. All the result showed that the target genes of SIRT1 pathway including P53, NF-kB, FOXO1, FOXO3, and FOXO4 were significantly downregulated to SIRT1, suggesting that apoptosis pathway might transcriptionally be regulated to SIRT1. In addition, the expression level of SIRT1 was significantly increased by XFZ, it might prove that SIRT1 is the target of XFZY working on ischemia heart disease. Our findings supported that XFZY might function to protect myocardial cells and reduce myocardial injury though SIRT1 signaling pathway and has the same pharmacological effect with Res.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25114706 PMCID: PMC4119619 DOI: 10.1155/2014/537014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1(a) Normal group. (b) Ischemia group. (c) Sham-operated group. (d) Res group. (e) XFZY group. (f) L-NAME group.
The information of primary antibodies.
| Antibody | Company | Species | Dilution factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sirt1 | Epitomics | Rabbit | 1 : 2500 |
| FOXO1 | Epitomics | Rabbit | 1 : 1000 |
| TP53 | Epitomics | Rabbit | 1 : 2000 |
| FOXO3 | Epitomics | Rabbit | 1 : 2000 |
| FOXO4 | Epitomics | Rabbit | 1 : 2000 |
| NF-kB | Epitomics | Rabbit | 1 : 2000 |
| GAPDH | Sigma | Goat | 1 : 8000 |
| Anti-rabbit | Sigma | Goat | 1 : 8000 |
| Target gene | The primer sequences | Amplification length (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| P53 | Upstream: 5′-GCAGTTCCTCTTCCTGCAGTACTC-3′; | 241 |
| Downstream: 5′-AAC CAGACCTCAGGCGGCTCATAG-3′ | ||
|
NF- | Upstream: 5′-CGATCTGTTTCCCCT CATCT-3′ | 175 |
| Downstream: 5′-ATTGGGTGCGTCTTAGTGGT-3′ | ||
| FOX01 | Upstream: 5′-AACCAGCTCAAAT GCTAGTACCATC-3′ | 198 |
| Downstream: 5′-CAGAAGGTTCTCCATGTTTTTCT GGA-3′ | ||
| FOX03 | Upstream: 5′-TACACGGCTTGCTTACGG-3′ | 423 |
| Downstream: 5′-GGG TTC AGA ACG AAG GGA CT-3′; | ||
| FOX04 | Upstream: 5-TCATCAGCCAGGCCATTGAA-3′ | 174 |
| Downstream: 5′-TGCTGTGCAAAGACAGGTTGTG-3′; | ||
| Sirt1-2 | Upstream: 5′-TTTCAGAACCACCAAAGCG-3′ | 206 |
| Downstream: 5′-TCCCACAGGAAACAGAAACC-3′ | ||
|
| Upstream: 5-GAG ACC TTC AAC ACC CCA GCC-3 | 263 |
| Downstream: 5-AAT GTC ACG CAC GAT TTC CC-3 |
Figure 2Expression of SIRT1 by quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
| Group |
| SIRT1 |
|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 10 | 10.64 ± 2.01△ |
| Ischemia group | 10 | 6.92 ± 1.21∗◊ |
| Sham-operated group | 10 | 9.49 ± 1.31△ |
| XFZY group | 10 | 8.33 ± 2.14△ |
| Res group | 10 | 9.22 ± 2.29△ |
| L-NAME group | 10 | 6.38 ± 2.93∗◊ |
Compared with the normal group, *P < 0.05; compared with the ischemia group, △ P < 0.05; compared with the XFZY group, ◊ P < 0.05.
Expression of P53 by real-time PCR.
| Group |
| P53 |
|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 10 | 7.23 ± 1.31△ |
| Ischemia group | 10 | 11.02 ± 1.78∗◊ |
| Sham-operated group | 10 | 8.89 ± 2.63△ |
| XFZY group | 10 | 9.09 ± 1.65△ |
| Res group | 10 | 8.27 ± 4.29△ |
| L-NAME group | 10 | 12.01 ± 2.18∗◊ |
Compared with the normal group, *P < 0.05; compared with the ischemia group, △ P < 0.05; compared with the XFZY group, ◊ P < 0.05.
Expression of nf-κB by real-time PCR.
| Group |
| nf- |
|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 10 | 5.16 ± 2.23△ |
| Ischemia group | 10 | 10.12 ± 1.89∗◊ |
| Sham-operated group | 10 | 6.89 ± 2.15△ |
| XFZY group | 10 | 7.28 ± 1.35△ |
| Res group | 10 | 7.07 ± 1.29△ |
| L-NAME group | 10 | 11.34 ± 2.09∗◊ |
Compared with the normal group, *P < 0.05; compared with the ischemia group, △ P < 0.05; compared with the XFZY group, ◊ P < 0.05.
Expression of FOXO1 by real-time PCR.
| Group |
| FOXO1 |
|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 10 | 9.89 ± 1.83△ |
| Ischemia group | 10 | 16.25 ± 2.07∗◊ |
| Sham-operated group | 10 | 11.21 ± 1.59△ |
| XFZY group | 10 | 13.28 ± 1.35△ |
| Res group | 10 | 13.07 ± 1.09△ |
| L-NAME group | 10 | 18.48 ± 2.79∗◊ |
Compared with the normal group, *P < 0.05; compared with the ischemia group, △ P < 0.05; compared with the XFZY group, ◊ P < 0.05.
Expression of FOXO3 by real-time PCR.
| Group |
| FOXO3 |
|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 10 | 8.06 ± 1.32△ |
| Ischemia group | 10 | 14.23 ± 2.09∗◊ |
| Sham-operated group | 10 | 9.45 ± 1.15△ |
| XFZY group | 10 | 11.08 ± 0.97△ |
| Res group | 10 | 11.21 ± 0.67△ |
| L-NAME group | 10 | 14.34 ± 2.13∗◊ |
Compared with the normal group, *P < 0.05; compared with the ischemia group, △ P < 0.05; compared with the XFZY group, ◊ P < 0.05.
Expression of FOXO4 by real-time PCR.
| Group |
| FOXO4 |
|---|---|---|
| Normal group | 10 | 4.96 ± 1.13△ |
| Ischemia group | 10 | 11.25 ± 0.89∗◊ |
| Sham-operated group | 10 | 5.18 ± 1.45△ |
| XFZY group | 10 | 6.54 ± 1.65△ |
| Res group | 10 | 6.99 ± 1.19△ |
| L-NAME group | 10 | 12.34 ± 1.09∗◊ |
Compared with the normal group, *P < 0.05; compared with the ischemia group, △ P < 0.05; compared with the XFZY group, ◊ P < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 4