Elevated body mass index as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease: current perspectives.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined by the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative as the presence of reduced kidney function or kidney damage for a period of 3 months or greater. Obesity is considered a risk factor for CKD development, but its precise role in contributing to CKD and end stage kidney disease is not fully elucidated. In this narrative review, the objectives are to describe the pathogenesis of CKD in obesity, including the impact of altered adipokine secretion in obesity and CKD, and to provide an overview of the clinical studies assessing the risk of obesity and CKD development.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined

In 2002, CKD was defined by the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative as the presence of reduced kidney function, or kidney damage, for a period of 3 months or greater.1 Decreased kidney function refers to a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which is typically estimated (eGFR) in clinical settings, calculated based on the serum creatinine and one of several available equations. By GFR criteria, CKD is diagnosed if GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for a period of 3 months or greater.1 Once detected, for clinical purposes, based on the eGFR, CKD is divided into stages, with mild CKD represented by stages 1 and 2, and moderate to severe CKD represented by stages 3–5.1 The 2012 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of CKD recommended the GFR categories outlined in Table 1 to classify CKD.2

Table 1

Classification of chronic kidney disease by estimated GFR criteria

GFR category	GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)	Terms
G1	≥90	Normal or high
G2	60–89	Mildly decreased
G3a	45–59	Mildly to moderately decreased
G3b	30–44	Moderately to severely decreased
G4	15–29	Severely decreased
G5	<15	Kidney failure

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group.

Note: Data from KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:1–150.2

Abbreviation: GFR, glomerular filtration rate.

Kidney damage in the CKD definition refers to pathologic abnormalities (obtained from renal biopsy or diagnostic imaging studies), abnormal urinary sediment, or increased urinary protein excretion. Of these, albuminuria is the most frequently assessed marker of kidney damage because of its associated increased risk of CKD progression and end stage renal disease (ESRD) at higher levels of albuminuria, independent of eGFR.3 Albuminuria is classified, based on severity, as A1 (optimal or normal; albuminuria category <30 mg/g), A2 (high; albuminuria category between 30 and 300 mg/g), and A3 (very high; albuminuria category >300 mg/g).2

The increasing prevalence of CKD in the general population and its associated comorbidities render this condition a substantial public health problem. Prevalence estimates of the burden of CKD vary according to the population under study and the CKD definition used. A systematic review from 2012 reported CKD prevalence estimates derived from eGFR measures ranged from 1.7% in China to 8.1% in the USA.4 A Canadian study predicted the life-time risk of an individual developing ESRD and determined the risk was higher in men and is highest in those who had baseline CKD. If eGFR =44–59 mL/min/1.73 m2, the life-time risk of ESRD is 7.51% for men and 3.21% for women.5 Thus, identifying strategies to diagnose and prevent CKD progression is imperative.

It remains uncertain whether screening the general population for CKD is cost-effective;6 therefore, targeted screening for certain groups within the population is recommended.7 Those at the highest risk of developing CKD should be screened: individuals with CVD risk factors (in particular diabetes and/or hypertension) or in patients who have established CVD.7 At this time, routine screening for CKD in patients who are obese in the absence of these other risk factors is not recommended.7

Obesity and CKD

Overweight and obesity are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health.8 The WHO definition of obesity is based on various categorical cut-points based on the body mass index (BMI) of weight-for-height: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (>30 kg/m2), with obesity class I (30.0–34.9 kg/m2), obesity class II (35.0–39.9 kg/m2), and obesity class III (>40.0 kg/m2).8 Obesity rates have doubled worldwide since 1980, and obesity-related disease is cited as the fifth leading risk factor for global deaths.8 In Canada, obesity rates have steadily risen during the last decade, and in 2011, 25.3% of the Canadian population identified themselves as obese.9

Pathophysiology of CKD development in obesity

Figure 1 describes altered renal hemodynamics, which result in two pathogenic mechanisms of kidney injury in obesity: glomerular hyperperfusion and hyperfiltration.10,11 An elegant study conducted in dogs by Henegar et al10 described in detail some of the physiologic and hormonal changes which occur acutely in obesity leading to hyperperfusion and hyperfiltration. Non-obese dogs were fed a high-fat diet (n=4) for 7–9 weeks, or for 24 weeks (n=4), (so that the dogs would gain 50% of their bodyweight or more), and were compared to non-obese control dogs (n=8).10 At study end, blood pressure, pulse rate, GFR and renal plasma flow were all significantly higher in obese versus non-obese dogs. Plasma insulin levels and plasma renin activity were also significantly greater (Table 2).10

Figure 1

Pathophysiology of obesity-related glomerulopathy.

Table 2

Weight, hemodynamic parameters, renal function, and hormone levels for obese and lean dogs

Parameter	Lean (N=8)	7–9-week obese (N=4)	24-week obese (N=4)
Bodyweight, kg	23.6±1.7	38.6±2.1a	35.9±0.4a
Mean arterial pressure, mmHg	90±4	104±3a	100.3±5.0a
Heart rate, beats/min	81±2	104±3a	101±3a
GFR, mL/min	75±4	109±4a	97.8±6.7a
ERPF, mL/min	179±14	313±10a	264±17a
Plasma insulin, mU/mL	17.1±3.4	40.4±12.9	37.5±9.0a
Plasma renin activity, ng angiotensin, 1/mL/min	0.36±0.10	0.59±0.11	1.07±0.42a

Notes:

P<0.05 versus lean. Copyright © 2001. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. Reproduced with permission of the American Society of Nephrology, via the Copyright Clearance Center. Reproduced from Henegar JR, et al. Functional and structural changes in the kidney in the early stages of obesity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:1211–1217.10

Abbreviations: GFR, glomerular filtration rate measured by total [125]iothalamate clearance; ERPF, effective renal plasma flow.

In addition to these changes, histological analyses were performed. Structurally, the kidneys of obese dogs demonstrated enlarged Bowman’s space, increased glomerular cell proliferation, increased mesangial expansion and thickened basement membranes, and increased expression of renal TGF (transforming growth factor)-β. The glomerulosclerosis scores for obese versus lean dog kidneys were not statistically different, indicating that renal scarring does not occur acutely in obesity.10

Together, these results demonstrate a near immediate effect of acute obesity on kidney structure and function, but suggest chronic obesity is necessary for permanent renal scarring. Over time, it is postulated that chronic obesity results in glomerular hyperfiltration and in the development of microalbuminuria/proteinuria, (based on direct measurements of GFR in obese individuals),11 followed by hypofiltration, decreased GFR, and CKD progression.12,13 Renal pathology specimens have confirmed the finding of an obesity-related glomerulopathy, where the predominant findings are glomerular hypertrophy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.11

The biological mechanisms whereby obesity contributes to CKD remain incompletely understood; however, it is known that obesity may promote kidney damage through direct and indirect mechanisms. Indirect mechanisms of CKD development in obesity include coexisting conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, the two most common causes of CKD, and two conditions recommended for targeted CKD screening.7 Direct mechanisms include hemodynamic and hormonal effects, which lead to glomerular hyperperfusion (increased renal plasma flow)10 and glomerular hyperfiltration (increased GFR),11,12 processes hypothesized to occur because of renal afferent arteriolar vasodilation.13 As a result, glomerular capillary pressure increases, which may result subsequently in increased urinary albumin excretion: microalbuminuria (urinary protein loss of 30–300 mg per 24 hours), followed by overt proteinuria (urinary protein loss of >300 mg per 24 hours), progressive loss in kidney function (declining GFR), and eventually, ESRD.11

Obesity, adipokines, and CKD

In addition to the renal hemodynamic changes that contribute to the development of obesity-related glomerulopathy, recent evidence has suggested that hormones and cytokines secreted from adipose tissue also contribute to CKD. The type and location of adipose tissue is believed to impact on the development of systemic disease. For instance, white adipose tissue, which is the most prevalent in humans, under normal physiological conditions, is represented by a ratio of subcutaneous adipose tissue to visceral adipose tissue, which should be ideally less than 20%.14 Visceral adipose tissue has the highest capacity to secrete hormones and cytokines (referred to as adipokines),14 including those with anti-atherosclerotic properties and those with pro-atherosclerotic properties.

The metabolic syndrome is a syndrome that emphasizes the role of visceral adiposity, along with other risk factors, in the pathogenesis of disease. The NCEP-ATP III (National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III) defines metabolic syndrome as possessing any three of the following criteria: abdominal obesity (waist circumference >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women), serum triglycerides (TG) ≥1.7 mmol/L, or drug treatment for elevated TG; serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <1 mmol/L in men and <1.3 mmol/L in women (or drug treatment for low HDL-C); blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg or drug treatment for hypertension; and fasting plasma glucose 5.6 mmol/L or drug treatment for hyperglycemia.15 Although there are other definitions for this syndrome, the constellation of metabolic syndrome risk factors, including abdominal obesity, dysglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia is consistent. Visceral obesity is strongly correlated with insulin resistance, and thus patients with some or all of the metabolic syndrome components have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus,16 cardiovascular disease (CVD),17 and CKD.18,19 It is hypothesized that in obesity and insulin resistance, an imbalance between the secretion of pro-versus anti-atherogenic occurs. As a result, pro-atherogenic and inflammatory cytokine production increases, interferes with insulin signaling, and contributes to the development of insulin resistance,20 vascular wall inflammation,21 and CKD.22,23

Diabetes mellitus and hypertension, two components of metabolic syndrome, are also the most common causes for CKD and ESRD. Thus, whether metabolic syndrome is an independent risk factor for CKD, or whether this observed association is confounded (based on the fact that the individual metabolic syndrome components may be associated with each other as well as with CKD) is important to discern. Thomas et al,23 in a systematic review including over 30,000 patients, reported that metabolic syndrome was an independent risk factor for CKD (odds ratio of eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34–1.80). Moreover, as the number of metabolic syndrome components increase from one to five, the strength of the association between metabolic syndrome and CKD increases (P for trend, 0.02).23

Since adipose tissue functions an active endocrine organ, there is interest in defining obesity-related alterations in hormone and adipokine secretion, and their contribution to CKD production and progression. There are numerous hormones and adipokines known to potentially impact on CKD development, and of these, adiponectin and leptin are two adipokines directly secreted from white adipose tissue whose impact on CKD development has been studied. Resistin, visfatin, and the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activity in adipose tissue will also be discussed briefly.

Adiponectin and CKD

Adiponectin is a 26.4 kDa protein directly secreted by adipocytes, and in healthy patients, is an important adipokine involved in anti-inflammatory, anti-atherogenic, and insulin-sensitizing properties. Adiponectin is believed to provide a protective role of preventing disease through decreasing inflammation, and levels have been shown to be reduced in obese patients,24 suggesting low adiponectin is important in the etiology of obesity-related diseases. In patients with kidney disease, adiponectin levels increase as kidney function declines,25 and adiponectin levels are increased in patients with ESRD receiving dialysis.26 However, whether higher adiponectin in CKD patients is present as a consequence of retention due to renal dysfunction, or is increased because of a physiological role, is uncertain.

To date, study conclusions have been inconsistent in determining a causal role of adiponectin in the pathogenesis of CKD development. The potential protective effect of adiponectin in preventing CKD development appears to be related to the preservation of renal podocytes, which when damaged are responsible, in part, for proteinuria development. A preclinical study of adiponectin knockout mice demonstrated increased renal fibrosis and proteinuria in CKD (subtotal renal ablation) versus wild-type mice.27 Subsequent treatment of knockout mice with adiponectin reversed proteinuria, and thus low adiponectin may be a novel mechanism for CKD development.27

In a study of 406 patients by Yilmaz et al,28 with non-diabetic CKD, including 80 receiving hemodialysis, adiponectin, visfatin, and endothelial dysfunction were assessed. Endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in the pathogenesis of vascular disease, including CKD, and is characterized by impaired function of the endothelium, such that vasodilation is reduced. In the Yilmaz study, endothelial dysfunction was assessed by flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery by high-resolution ultrasound technique. Adiponectin levels increased as kidney function declined, indicating decreased renal excretion with advancing CKD.28 However, once adjusted for kidney function, a multivariable linear regression model demonstrated that patients with the highest adiponectin levels have the highest flow-mediated dilatation levels (adiponectin [β=0.09; P=0.05]), and thus improved endothelial function. Therefore, low adiponectin, in CKD, is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Other CKD studies have demonstrated that low adiponectin is a risk factor for similar adverse outcomes. In a study of 86 patients with stage 1–4 CKD and diabetic nephropathy, low adiponectin was associated with an increased risk of CKD progression.25 Similarly, in a cohort of 227 CKD patients requiring dialysis,26 patients with lower adiponectin levels had an increased risk of developing cardiovascular events.

Koshimura et al compared serum and urine adiponectin levels in diabetic patients (including some patients with CKD) with either normo-, micro-, or macroalbuminuria (N=38).29 Serum adiponectin levels were higher in patients with macroalbuminuria compared with normoalbuminuria (11.0 μg/mL versus 6.5 μg/mL; P<0.05). Urine adiponectin results showed similar findings, and diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria had greater urine adiponectin versus normoalbuminuria (50.3 μg lg versus 4.9 μg lg; P<0.05). The authors suggested that increased adiponectin secretion might be enhanced in patients with overt nephropathy, in an effort to reduce microvascular damage.29 On the other hand, creatinine levels were significantly higher in the overt diabetic nephropathy group in this study (20 mg/dL (17.7 μmol/L) versus 0.70 mg/dL (62 μmol/L) in diabetics with microalbuminuria; P<0.001), and therefore reduced renal function could also have impacted on adioponectin levels.29

In summary, adiponectin levels may be increased in patients with severe CKD and in proteinuric CKD patients. However, low adiponectin in patients who have CKD is a risk factor for CKD progression and cardiovascular events. Possible biological mechanisms whereby adiponectin promotes CKD include proteinuria development (podocyte injury) and endothelial dysfunction. A definitive causal relationship between adiponectin, pathogenesis of vascular disease, and CKD remains uncertain.

Leptin and CKD

Another adipokine which has been evaluated in CKD patients is leptin. The word leptin is derived from the Greek word “leptos” meaning thin. Leptin is a 16 kDa protein coded by the obese (Ob) gene, is directly secreted by adipocytes, and is involved in regulation of bodyweight and metabolism.30 Leptin is secreted in proportion to the amount of body fat, and in health, has an inhibitory effect on food intake.31 Interestingly, studies have shown obese patients have increased leptin levels, and a leptin-resistant state has been described in obese patients with increased BMI.30 Increased leptin appears to be a risk factor for CKD development. A large cross-sectional study of 5,000 patients demonstrated, in an adjusted model for age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, and lipids, that the risk of CKD development significantly increases as blood leptin levels rise.32 In addition, another study of 219 CKD patients demonstrated leptin is correlated with C-reactive protein levels, suggesting that inflammation is a factor contributing to hyper-leptinemia in CKD.33

Leptin is postulated to be involved in the pathogenesis of CKD, and CKD progression, through more than one mechanism. First, leptin stimulates the sympathetic nervous system, promoting renal sodium reabsorption, thereby increasing blood pressure.31,34 Second, leptin has also been linked to inducing renal injury, by stimulating renal endothelial cell proliferation and increased mesangial cell production, leading to renal scarring through the production of type I and type IV collagen, renal fibrosis, and proteinuria.35,36 Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between leptin and CKD development and progression.

Other adipokines and risk of CKD: resistin, visfatin, and RAAS in adipose tissue

Resistin is a 12.5 kDa protein expressed in macrophages from visceral adipose tissue.31 There is interest in studying whether resistin is associated with CKD development, because of the observation that resistin may be a regulator of insulin sensitivity. Preclinical studies, in mice, have suggested that resistin may impact on insulin sensitivity and on blood glucose levels. Steppan et al37 administered resistin by injection versus control to mice after an overnight fast, and again 12 hours later. Glucose tolerance and blood glucose were assessed after the second injection. Blood glucose increased by 28% post-resistin injection (P=0.004) and insulin levels were also increased (data not provided in the Steppan manuscript). In addition, resistin-treated mice demonstrated a significantly blunted response to the hypoglycemic action of insulin, suggesting that resistin impairs glucose tolerance.37 Whether resistin plays a role in insulin sensitivity in humans remains unclear.

Resistin levels are increased in CKD because of decreased renal clearance,38 and thus, CKD-induced accumulation of resistin could be a novel mechanism contributing to the high prevalence of insulin resistance noted in CKD and uremic patients. In a prevalent post hoc study of 239 CKD patients with stage 3–5 CKD, Axelsson et al39 demonstrated that resistin levels are increased in CKD patients, but that resistin, when adjusted for level of GFR, is not a mediator of insulin resistance. Kielstein et al40 reported similar findings in a study of 30 pre-dialysis CKD patients. Thus, at present, there are no data to support a causal role between elevated resistin, insulin resistance, and CKD development.

Visfatin is a 52 kDa protein secreted from visceral adipose tissue and macrophages,31 and blood levels of visfatin accumulate as kidney function declines.41 Visfatin may affect appetite and nutrition in CKD. A cross-sectional study of 246 incident dialysis CKD patients showed that patients with the highest visfatin levels had increased anorexia, lower serum albumin levels, and lower levels of essential and nonessential amino acids.42 Increased visfatin is also a risk factor for endothelial dysfunction.28 In the Yilmaz et al study28 evaluating adipokines and risk of endothelial dysfunction in 406 non-diabetic CKDs patients, visfatin was also assessed. Risk factors for endothelial dysfunction, in a multivariable adjusted linear regression model, also included visfatin (β=−0.15; P≤0.001) in addition to adiponectin (β=0.09; P=0.05), suggesting individuals with lower visfatin and higher adiponectin levels have better endothelial function.28

RAAS in adipose tissue

Space limitations do not permit a full review of the actions of the RAAS in the context of obesity and CKD. There are extensive data regarding the role of the components of the RAAS as critical regulators of systemic blood pressure, and of cardiovascular and renal homeostasis. Thus many therapeutic trials have demonstrated positive effects with pharmacological blockage of either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists in various clinical settings including diabetic nephropathy. However, recent evidence is supportive of the concept that RAAS may act locally in a variety of tissues, including adipose tissue.43 It has now been shown that all components of the RAAS are expressed in adipose tissue and that angiotensin type 1 and type 2 receptors are present in animal and human adipocytes.43 It is possible that local production of RAAS may contribute to the development of obesity-related hypertension. The normal actions of the RAAS include renal sodium retention and aldosterone secretion, and thus preservation of blood pressure. In obesity-related hypertension, despite elevated blood pressure, RAAS activity is increased. In a study of male Sprague Dawley rats, rats were fed a high-fat diet for 11 weeks to induce obesity.44 Obese rats were compared with non-obese rats. Obese rats had higher systemic blood pressure, higher plasma angiotensinogen levels, and had twice the angiotensinogen gene expression in (local) retroperitoneal adipose tissue.44 Thus, these results suggest that adipose tissue is a source of RAAS, which may act locally as well as systemically in contributing to obesity-related hypertension. Future studies are necessary to describe the specific role of local RAAS production in obesity and its potential contribution to the etiology of CKD development and CKD progression.

Clinical studies evaluating the association between obesity, CKD development, and CKD progression

Epidemiological studies have shown consistently that in the general adult population, individuals who are overweight (BMI >25.0–29.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI >30 kg/m2) have an increased risk of CKD development.45–54 A comprehensive meta-analysis by Wang et al51 from 2008 identified longitudinal cohort studies in adult populations which assessed the risk of CKD development in obese patients. Overall, the pooled relative risk (RR) in this paper supports the hypothesis that patients who are overweight or obese have an increased risk of developing “kidney disease”, defined as CKD, ESRD, kidney stones, and kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma). Using normal weight as the reference standard, individuals who were overweight (RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.3–1.5; P=0.003) or obese (RR 1.83; 95% CI 1.57–2.13; P=0.001) had a significantly increased risk of developing kidney disease.51 Most of the included studies were adjusted for confounders (such as age, sex, race, smoking status, diabetes, and hypertension), and thus, the pooled RR suggests obesity acts as an independent risk factor in the epidemiology of kidney disease development.51

In considering only those studies where kidney disease was defined only as the risk of developing CKD or ESRD as renal outcomes, the results are similar. Perhaps one of the largest studies attempting to evaluate this question is by Hsu et al.48 The authors evaluated the risk of developing ESRD over 21 years of follow-up, using WHO-recommended BMI cut-points, in 320,252 adults from the United States. Their findings suggested a dose–response relationship between BMI and ESRD. Compared with normal-weight patients, in this adjusted analysis, the RR for ESRD was 1.87 (95% CI 1.64–2.14) for overweight and 3.57 (95% CI 3.05–4.18) for class I obesity, 6.12 (95% CI 4.97–7.54) for class II, and 7.07 (95% CI 5.37–9.31) for class III obesity.48

Another recent large population study of participants from Iran by Noori et al53 demonstrated similar findings to the pooled RR from the Wang et al51 review. A total of 3,107 subjects free of CKD at baseline were followed over 7 years. The outcome was development of CKD defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.72 m2. Compared with the referent group (BMI <22 kg/m2) patients who were overweight (BMI 27–31 kg/m2; hazard ratio (HR) 1.79; 95% CI 1.19–2.69) or obese (BMI >31 kg/m2; HR 1.57; 95% CI 1.02–2.42) had an increased risk of developing CKD. Higher BMI, especially the obese category, was associated with an increased risk of CKD.49 This study also evaluated other obesity definitions in terms of CKD risk, including abdominal waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio. Results for abdominal waist circumference, but not waist-to-hip ratio, were consistent with the findings as described for increased BMI and risk of CKD.49

In patients with prevalent stage 3–5 CKD, there are few studies that have investigated the impact of obesity in contributing to CKD deterioration, and the available studies are of smaller sample size.55,56 In a prospective cohort study of 125 stage 3–5 CKD patients (excluding dialysis; mean eGFR 27.4±12 mL/min/1.73 m2), we (Garland et al55) evaluated the impact of BMI on kidney function decline. We described a deleterious effect of elevated BMI on kidney function decline over 1 year. In a multivariable adjusted regression model including age, hypertension, and proteinuria, we determined that every 5 kg/m2 rise in BMI increases the 1 year risk of progressive kidney function deterioration nearly twofold (odds ratio =1.8; 95% CI 1.3–2.6; P<0.0001).55 Another study, by Othman et al56 retrospectively evaluated the impact of obesity (BMI) on CKD progression in 125 non-diabetic CKD patients (mean eGFR 44.3 mL/min/1.73 m2). The frequency of CKD progression based on eGFR fall per year (>1 mL/min/1.73 m2/year) was 62.5% in overweight and 79.5% in obese compared with 44.7% in normal-weight CKD patients (P=0.007). By multivariate regression analysis, adjusted for age, hypertension, and proteinuria, baseline BMI was also an independent predictor of CKD progression (fall in eGFR mL/min/1.73 m2/year) (model R2=0.122; P<0.001).56 Larger longitudinal studies to study the relationship between BMI and CKD progression are needed.

Clinical assessment of obesity in CKD

The optimal measure of obesity in patients who have CKD is not known. BMI is commonly evaluated in clinical practice as a method of assessing obesity; however, a criticism of its use is that elevated BMI is reflective of general adiposity but does not differentiate between elevated BMI secondary to increased muscle mass, versus adipose tissues.57 In Noori et al’s study,53 waist circumference appeared to perform the best in terms of predicting CKD risk. However, in another study, by Elsayed et al,52 evaluating 13,324 patients, waist-to-hip ratio was associated with CKD development over 9.3 years, but not BMI. While most study findings concur that increased BMI is a risk for CKD and ESRD, some studies indicate sex-specific differences. One study by Iseki et al45 of over 100,000 patients from Japan, found that elevated BMI increased the risk of ESRD over 17 years in men but not in women. In Hsu et al’s48 study from the United States, sex-specific differences were not noted. Therefore, while pooled RR ratios are supportive that elevated BMI increases the overall population risk for CKD and ESRD, ethnicity and sex may modify the direction of these associations, and future studies are necessary to explore these relationships.

Some studies have indicated that patients within the lowest BMI category (underweight) have an increased risk of kidney disease.57 Malnutrition is a feature of uremia, and a reverse epidemiology has been described, where CKD patients in the highest WHO BMI categories have been observed to have paradoxically improved survival.57,58 In Hsu et al’s48 study predicting ESRD, underweight patients did not have an increased risk for developing ESRD (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.15–1.00). Similarly, a study by Stengel et al50 of 9,082 patients from the United States failed to demonstrate an increased risk of CKD development in underweight patients (RR 1.3; 95% CI 0.5–3.1). Because the classifications of underweight, overweight, and obesity vary across studies, findings from various studies regarding the association between underweight BMI and kidney disease may be affected, and thus more data are required.

Summary

Studies show that obesity increases the risk of CKD and ESRD in the adult general population through direct and indirect mechanisms. The impact of obesity in the pathogenesis of CKD appears to be independent of blood pressure or diabetes mellitus, the two most common causes of CKD. Adipose tissue functions as an endocrine organ, and adipokines such as adiponectin, which have anti-inflammatory and anti-atherosclerotic properties, may serve as a future potential target for obesity therapy. Most epidemiological studies have shown a consistent positive association between increased BMI and CKD and/or ESRD development. However, studies evaluating whether lifestyle modification and weight loss strategies, such as bariatric surgery, mitigate CKD development and progression are needed.