| Literature DB >> 25113505 |
Wen Meng, Hong-Hong Zhu1, Hu Li, Guoqing Wang, Dongshan Wei, Xing Feng.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No case of solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome has been reported in China. This study was to report a rare repeatedly recurrent case of solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome diagnosed in China and a three-decade literature review of solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome worldwide. CASEEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25113505 PMCID: PMC4267432 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Summary characteristics of 45 cases of solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome, 1979-2011
| Characteristic | Benign (n = 22) | Malignant (n = 23) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis (years): Mean ± SD$ | 60.8 ± 10.0 | 64.1 ± 10.8 | 0.29 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 10 | 11 | 0.87 |
| Female | 12 | 12 | |
| Sign | |||
| Pleural effusion | 5 (n = 16) | 4 (n = 16) | 0.69 |
| Clubbing in fingers | 5 (n = 16) | 4 (n = 16) | 0.69 |
| Skin change | 2 (n = 16) | 1 (n = 16) | 0.54 |
| Tumor mass | |||
| Clear borders | 13 (n = 13) | 16 (n = 20) | 0.09 |
| Location | |||
| Right | 13 (n = 21) | 14 (n = 23) | 0.94 |
| Left | 8 (n = 21) | 9 (n = 23) | 0.94 |
| Up | 1 (n = 17) | 2 (n = 20) | 0.65 |
| Low | 16 (n = 17) | 18 (n = 20) | 0.65 |
| Size (cm) | |||
| ≤ 10 | 0 (n = 17) | 1 (n = 21) | |
| >10 | 17 (n = 17) | 20 (n = 21) | 0.36 |
| Morphologic Features | |||
| Homogeneous | 2 (n = 5) | 3 (n = 17) | |
| Heterogeneous | 3 (n = 5) | 14 (n = 17) | 0.29 |
*Pearson P-values for all frequency variables were estimated by individual Chi-square test and for age at diagnosis by t-test.
$SD: Standard deviation.
Treatment and outcome of 45 cases of solitary fibrous tumors of pleura with Doege-Potter syndrome, 1979-2011
| Treatment/outcome | Benign (n = 22) | Malignant (n = 23) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | |||
| Surgery | |||
| Simple excision | 13 (n = 18) | 11 (n = 20) | |
| Complex excision | 5 (n = 18) | 9 (n = 20) | 0.27 |
| Radiotherapy | 0 | 1 (n = 23) | |
| Chemotherapy | 0 | 1 (n = 23) | |
| Combination therapy | |||
| Surgery + radiotherapy | 0 | 2 (n = 23) | |
| Surgery + Chemotherapy | 0 | 0 | |
| Surgery + radio + Chemotherapy | 0 | 0 | |
| Recurrent | 2 (n = 14) | 2 (n = 15) | 0.94 |
| Imaging features | |||
| Lobular borders | 6 (n = 11) | 9 (n = 15) | |
| Smooth borders | 5 (n = 11) | 6 (n = 15) | 0.78 |
| Pedicle | 3 (n = 11) | 5 (n = 16) | 0.82 |
| Calcification | 2 (n = 9) | 0 | |
| Mass effect on mediastinum | 8 (n = 9) | 8 (n = 13) | 0.16 |
| Atelectasis | 8 (n = 9) | 7 (n = 9) | 0.53 |
| Chest wall involvement | 1 (n = 12) | 3 (n = 8) | 0.11 |
| Results of PET CT$ | 2 (n = 3) | 0 | |
| Benefit of transthoracic needle biopsy | 8 (n = 11) | 7 (n = 9) | 0.80 |
*Pearson P-values for all frequency variables were estimated by individual Chi-square test.
$PET CT: positron emission tomography-computed tomography.